Arm Reportedly Freezes Hiring, Cancels Some Benefits Until Nvidia Takeover

Nvidia’s bid to buy Arm might have just become even more contentious. Today the Register reported that Arm, until the Nvidia deal is finalized, has instituted a hiring freeze and canceled the annual “wellbeing” allowance it paid to employees.

The hiring freeze appears to be limited to the IP Products Group responsible for designing Arm chips, with other departments still being allowed to bring on new employees, but even hiring for those roles is said to have “slowed to a trickle.”

FlexPot reportedly offered varying amounts based on location, with U.S. employees getting as much as $8,500 for "activities that support you and your family’s health or financial wellbeing" and "any activities that allow you to learn something new."

That’s a significant amount of money Arm employees can no longer count on, and it wouldn’t be a surprise if many sought new employment as a result. The Register said employees did receive a bonus last quarter, however, which could engender loyalty.

A memo about the hiring freeze reportedly said: 

Companies often enact cost-saving measures when they’re on the verge of being acquired. Usually, it’s supposed to make sure the deal remains attractive to the buyer; however, it’s hard to believe Nvidia would back out of the Arm takeover.

But it’s mostly because Nvidia’s already made a $2 billion commitment to the Arm acquisition—a $1.25 billion breakup clause—that makes it harder to justify backing out of the deal because of Arm’s hiring policies.

Yet these new policies simply invite more criticism of the acquisition. Before, the complaints were mostly ideological—how could Nvidia maintain Arm’s neutral licensing approach when it’s designing its own chips with proprietary technology?

Now the deal has resulted in a hiring freeze in Arm’s core teams and what amounts to a substantial pay cut for many of its employees, and there’s no word on what happens if regulators block the acquisition. Will the freeze be lifted? Will the FlexPot system be reenacted? And how many employees will stick around to find out?

TOPICS
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • sizzling
    I believe this is standard stuff in this situation. I went through a situation where 1 FTSE250 company was taken over by another and it was very similar constraints put in place until the year after acquisition.
    Reply