Windows 8 Not Much Help For Depressed DRAM Industry

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Wolfgang Gruener
Contributor

Wolfgang Gruener is an experienced professional in digital strategy and content, specializing in web strategy, content architecture, user experience, and applying AI in content operations within the insurtech industry. His previous roles include Director, Digital Strategy and Content Experience at American Eagle, Managing Editor at TG Daily, and contributing to publications like Tom's Guide and Tom's Hardware.

  • nieur
    why would anyone buy new PC just because new OS is available? on top of that it does not demand improved hardware
    Reply
  • nebun
    what does a software company have to do with memory prices....I am a little confused
    Reply
  • rahulkadukar
    4 Gb 4DDR3 chip can be purchased for as little as $1.75
    Where ?
    Reply
  • @rahulkadukar "chip" is referring to the actual chips on the PCB not the entire module just fyi
    Reply
  • hp79
    nebunwhat does a software company have to do with memory prices....I am a little confusedThe idea here is that assuming Windows being a dominant OS, had Windows 8 required more RAM than Windows 7, there would have been more demand for RAM. But since Windows 8 is even more efficient, it's not going to encourage people to buy more RAM. I think most people already have at least 4 GB in their system now.
    Reply
  • ronch79
    The jump in graphics quality and OS capability has improved markedly with past OSes. Today I think the improvement between successive OS releases grows smaller and smaller, so any big jump in RAM requirement is seen as sloppiness in part of the OS (and its code). Take Vista, for example, it was deemed inefficient (and yes, even if it's graphically much prettier than XP) because of its RAM requirements. MS had to go back to the drawing boards, clean up the code, and re-release it as Windows 7. Just my $0.02.
    Reply
  • teodoreh
    1st: You can't just increase the memory requirements without major leaps on services. You can't launch W8 requiring 8GB of RAM with no apparent reason. You need new more memory hungry applications to be written to say "you will need 8GB of RAM but, we will provide u with this new feature".

    2nd: If Windows 8 were as stupidly memory hungry as Windows Vista at their time (where most laptos were shipped with 512MB~1GB RAM) then that would hurt W8 adaptability as Vista.

    3rd: The majority of current motherboards support 2~4 slots and 8GB~16GB of DDR3, and laptops usually do have 0~1 empty slots for upgrades.

    4th: We are in the mid to end of life of DDR3 and the prices are extremely low.

    5th: Who cares? Semiconductor companies should focus on the SSD wild race. Magnetic media, WD, Toshiba and Seagate will soon disappear from the market, and someone will have to fill the gap.
    Reply
  • BoredErica
    I don't like Windows 8, but this article doesn't make sense to me. Windows 8 isn't a ram-hungry mess, and thank god for that. Why would ram decrease a lot if the OS is relatively light?
    Reply
  • Someone Somewhere
    rahulkadukar4 Gb 4DDR3 chip can be purchased for as little as $1.75

    Where ?
    That's a 4 gigabit chip, or 512MB. Plus it's only the actual chip, not the PCB, assembly, other chips for SPD etc. It's also probably the price for buying thousands of them
    Reply
  • unksol
    9420565 said:
    4 Gb 4DDR3 chip can be purchased for as little as $1.75
    Where ?

    That's the low end ones, and that's Gb. You need 8 of them to make 4 GB. Plus the PCB, spreaders, manufacturing and other parts.

    Edit: beat by "someone" by 51 seconds lol
    Reply