Intel to FTC: We Didn't Do Anything Wrong

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Marcus Yam served as Tom's Hardware News Director during 2008-2014. He entered tech media in the late 90s and fondly remembers the days when an overclocked Celeron 300A and Voodoo2 SLI comprised a gaming rig with the ultimate street cred.
  • logitic
    Ok, I just fell out of my chair! I knew this was coming....


    Stay tuned for rebuttal from FTC
    Reply
  • roofus
    Intel is innocent. They just said so. Everybody can move along now.
    Reply
  • sstym
    Also:
    "Boohoo. We didn't screw AMD over when their processors were better than ours (aaah, the pre Core 2 Duo years).
    It will cost the taxpayers millions of dollars WE could have extorted from them with a new netburst-like ripoff.
    Competition is bad, the FTC sucks, the consumers' interest (and my houses in the Caribbean) are clearly better served by an Intel Monopoly."
    Reply
  • Glorian
    Intel: Ok AMD we are sorry, you can have some pie.
    AMD: Thank you.
    FTC: CAN I HAS PIE TOO?!
    Reply
  • hakesterman
    Shame on you Intel, I hope they stick it to you. You were very very very bad by giving companys like Dell, Gateway, Acer millions of dollars if they choose to only use your processers in all the high end PC's. Not only did you violate federal laws, you made it nearly impossible for consumers to get the Processor they wanted with the PC they wanted which i think a Class Action Lawsuit should also be filed. When it comes to fair competition you are as bad as bad can be, i hope they punish you very very badly.........

    Reply
  • deadlockedworld
    I think anything that helps other companies compete with intel is good for the marketplace.

    Competition breeds innovation--monopolies stagnate technological growth.
    Reply
  • maximus20895
    ^someone wants to give them a spanking..
    Reply
  • rhino13
    It's a good thing Obama can't be held accountable for his choice of FTC chairman, or his aggressive stance on anti-trust legislation, or anything else for that matter, otherwise this might reflect poorly on him.

    Intel is dead on. The FTC is trying to crate new laws with this lawsuit. But who can Intel turn to to defend them? This is what the Obama administration wants: More American companies becoming dependent upon the government.
    Reply
  • False_Dmitry_II
    Is spellcheck really that hard to use? I mean maybe it wouldn't be as important in the body of the article, but in the tagline? really?
    Reply
  • sonic-boom
    FTC is just being dumb here.
    Reply