Nvidia Reveals $50,000 Iray VCA Rendering Accelerator

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Damon Palovaara
    Wow I might have to sell my house for this, who needs a big house anyways when you have one of these. Hell you can live in your own virtual mansion if you wanted to
    Reply
  • Free2play_noobs
    @Damon Palovaara Obviously it is meant for enterprise use ,not for personal/Consumer use.
    Reply
  • rgd1101
    In a few years it will be real-time rendering and under $500.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    As usual Nvidia continues to amaze me.
    Reply
  • rwinches
    Far cry from the really cool state of the art Silicon Graphics SGI workstations of old.__Honda bought 25 nodes so this is good for Nvidia, I certainly want competition for AMD ATI.
    Reply
  • The device includes eight Kepler-based GPUs .... and 23,040 CUDA cores
    So that is 2880 CCs/GPU, meaning 8 Tesla K40 running in parallel? Wow, that's more than 11 TFLOPS of double precision power in that box.
    Reply
  • eodeo
    Thats equivalent of 8x 780TIs with 12gb of ram each. That's actually pretty good value, if on the expensive side for small studios."I certainly want competition for AMD ATI."Unfortunately, AMD cannot fight back as nvidia bought mental images, creators of mental ray and used it as base for iray. Iray is essentially mental ray ported to work on CUDA. There is no AMD alternative planed.
    Reply
  • mr meeseeks
    That is not an image of the Iray VCA. He is holding the compute module for Audi's self driving cars that fit's in a slot in the trunk. The VCA is sized to be rackmounted.
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    This appliance aims to eliminate the costly, lengthy process of building physical prototypes by rendering computer models with extremely high visual fidelity.

    Sure.... unless you actually need to test the prototype.
    You know.... like you need to do with just about every prototype....

    While a higher fidelity CAD model might be nicer for some; in the end a model is just a model is just a model.
    If you are building anything functional, you will still need to have at least one physical prototype phase to prove your system.
    Reply
  • c123456
    @outlw6669: You've never used solidworks... have you?
    Reply