After the release of the new Nvidia Shield device, we were able to get some time to sit down and play with the console at GDC.
The basic navigation is an important key feature between systems, and a bad interface can drive away customers. Fortunately, that doesn't appear to be a problem with Nvidia's Shield console. The octo-core processor used inside of the system allows for smooth navigation and fast native application performance.
The Shield controller looked somewhat large and bulky in photos, but in person it's actually smaller than you would expect. It fit comfortably in my hands, and I was surprised by how light it was.
One reason we suspect the weight is reduced is the removal of vibration features from the control. We didn't feel any vibration, and looking at an image of the controller disassembled, we don't see any parts that would facilitate vibration. This also would help explain the extended battery life of the controller, as vibration can take a toll on a battery.
Now for the part you are really interested in: how well does it game? Performance seemed to vary between titles. We had time to try three of the games available: Shadow of Mordor, Doom 3 BFG Edition, and Portal. We didn't notice any issues with Shadow of Mordor; walking, fighting and all other controls were responsive, with no noticeable delay.
Doom 3 BFG Edition didn't fare quite as well. The movement wasn't great, there was noticeable latency. At first I thought the movement sensitivity was set too high, but turning down the sensitivity didn't solve the issue. When turning, often the screen would turn longer than the joystick was pressed. Shooting had more problems, resulting in the gun often firing too late to hit its target. The game was still playable, but some users would likely not want to play the game with this issue affecting gameplay.
Portal had different issues; there weren't any difficulties with the game play, but the loading time when starting the game took a long time. Exiting the game and restarting it still had the same issue, so it wasn't a one time event for playing the game the first time. There are a number of potential causes for this delay.
The problems with Doom 3 BFG and Portal could be as a result of the device still undergoing development, and software bugs could still exist that need to be fixed. Some games likely received more attention and have been optimized better to be ready for Nvidia's event.
Another possibility is that the problem relates to network issues. Pulling these games through the network takes a very large amount of bandwidth (50 Mbps for 1080p at 60 Hz). As a result, the network could be the cause of these delays. It is fair to further wonder if the problem was caused by the dozen or so Nvidia Shield devices being used in the same building and competing for bandwidth.
It's too hard to say what the overall performance of the Nvidia Shield will be like for end users if network difficulties affected our hands on experience. This isn't completely inside of Nvidia's control; the servers supplying the data might be capable of handling all of the work, but areas with heavily-loaded networks or slow Internet connections will likely have a hard time using the service.
For those who don't face difficulties with the network, the game performance overall seemed playable for the games we tried. The image quality was clear, the action was fast, and it should give a reasonable 1080p gaming experience. While it won't be as good as a modern high-end gaming PC because of being locked at 1080p at 60 Hz and latency issues, it should be comparable to other game consoles. Most games on home consoles do not maintain 60 FPS, which negatively impacts the gaming experience. Game consoles also do not have the latency issues, so the Shield is a competitive force against home consoles.
Follow us @tomshardware, on Facebook and on Google+.
NEVER SETTLE :D
(You kind of walked into that one)
At $250-300 and good enough power to play some really nice looking games (and being at least a tad future-proof), you'd still woo people for the price of android games. I mean Xbox1/ps4 games are $60, and for $60 on android/tegrazone you could get 10 really great full length games (probably more than a dozen actually). If you're bargain hunting you can do even better with games like bard's tale ($1.99 for a few dozen hours of fun) if you haven't played some of the ported hits already elsewhere. Maybe they were just trying to get poor people who thought ouya sucks and want a 4K player etc. It's still a great deal IMHO, just I'd want to get closer to current gen consoles.
I'll wait for whatever they make with the 14nm Finfet chip at xmas from samsung. They'll probably update handheld and tablet with it. T4 was on 28nm for shield handheld, so I'd really like to see a 14nm Finfet with Denver/maxwell both cranked up. Just use the same shells for both units and add more memory/storage for quick time to market and cheap design. They could get me either way if they make these, but I'd need a 13in tablet and 1080p for speed. I have no need for this small of a unit to have higher res, and many games were made for bigger screens and already have puny fonts (on my dad's nexus 10in anyway). For the handheld I don't care if it's 720p as I'll mostly use it out to tv anyway (at 1080 or 4K I guess on a rev2 model here) and only occasionally out of the house.
This is a great device for some (for $100 more than ouya you get so much more power, 4K streaming pc to tv etc), but I need more power and am willing to pay more or wait until they upgrade it. I'll save money over the life of it on tons of cheap android games, where I'd get killed on console game prices year after year. So I don't mind $250-300 for better hardware here (still saving $100-150 out of the gate). Most of the console games are already on PC, so I'm after android stuff on the TV (cheap games not on PC/console in many cases) and streaming to tv from PC's gpu+4K vids. As you get older you can only sit on a PC so long before you require the TV with (fat/bloated) feet up or for some, worries about blood clots etc ;) 8-9hrs at work on a PC and the still more at home on a PC and I need a break on the big screen.
I think you mean a big B. There's no difference between Mega and mega. That is a small b.
ops, yes that's what I meant... looks like a small 'b'
coming from science though, M is mega, m is milli :P
Well, you got me there!
Normally for network bandwidth, small b is used. I'm not sure if there's a specific reason, or it's just for marketing speeds to sound faster.