Optical Data Transmission World Record Broken, 1.8 Petabit per Second

Timelapse or vehicles on a freeway
(Image credit: Pexels.com)

The world's fastest data transmission speed record has been broken yet again, paving the road for increasingly instantaneous transmission of the world's entire knowledge repository. The team who achieved this feat are researchers from Technical University of Denmark (DTU) and Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. Their novel technique leverages a single laser and a single, custom-designed optical chip enabling throughputs to the tune of 1.8 Pbit/s (Petabits per second) — double today's global internet traffic.

For scale, the same data transmission record had been previously broken back in August 2020 with a then-astonishing 178 Tbit/s (Terabits per second) — enough to download Netflix's then-existing catalog in less time than you could count a single Mississippi. But that speed is only around 10% of today's maximum throughput announcement, meaning that in less than three years we've improved the technology tenfold.

Some of the secret sauce behind the record hails from the proprietary optical chip, which can take the input from a single infrared laser to create a spectrum of many colors. Each color represents a frequency that's not unlike the teeth of a comb, perfectly and equally distinguishable from one another (this is exactly the process through which we distinguish colors, by detecting the different frequencies of light materials reflect towards us). And since these multiple frequencies are perfectly distinguishable from one another, with a set separate distance between each, that information can be transmitted across each of these frequencies (or channels). The more colors/frequencies/channels, the more data can be sent, which led to the establishment of the new 1.8 Pbit/s transmission speed world record.

Today's optical technology would require around 1,000 different lasers to produce the same amount of wavelengths capable of transmitting all of this information. That in itself is a problem; each additional laser increases energy consumption, multiplies the number of failure points, and makes the setup harder to manage.

Victor Torres Company, professor at Chalmers University of Technology and head of the research group that has developed and manufactured the chip, explained something of the team's work:

“What is special about this chip is that it produces a frequency comb with ideal characteristics for fiber-optical communications – it has high optical power and covers a broad bandwidth within the spectral region that is interesting for advanced optical communications,” he said.

Interestingly, like many other scientific "missteps", the initial design purpose wasn't to break the world's transmission throughput record:

“In fact, some of the characteristic parameters were achieved by coincidence and not by design,” Victor Torres Company added. “However, with efforts in my team, we are now capable to reverse engineer the process and achieve with high reproducibility microcombs for target applications in telecommunications.”

The research has practical applications that should be scaled out of the lab, as well - the idea isn't for this technology to grab a headline and become abandoned to the corridors of vaporware. According to professor Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe, Head of the Centre of Excellence for Silicon Photonics for Optical Communications (SPOC) at DTU, the technology shows tremendous potential for being scaled up:

“Our calculations show that—with the single chip made by Chalmers University of Technology, and a single laser—we will be able to transmit up to 100 Pbit/s. The reason for this is that our solution is scalable—both in terms of creating many frequencies and in terms of splitting the frequency comb into many spatial copies and then optically amplifying them, and using them as parallel sources with which we can transmit data. Although the comb copies must be amplified, we do not lose the qualities of the comb, which we utilize for spectrally efficient data transmission.”

It's mind-blowing to think about so much information that it could strain a 100 Pbit/s connection — around 100 times the traffic flow of today's internet. But build the highways, as they say, and the traffic will come.

Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • YouFilthyHippo
    You'd be hard pressed to convince me that global internet traffic is only 900TB/s. With the billions of phones, computers, servers, and big companies, I dont find it likely
    Reply
  • This one was actually an old news. Around last October 2022 they did this, I suppose. So have they updated something on this now ?
    Reply
  • Btw, it is an interesting concept at least on paper, nonetheless.

    They did this by transferring the data through light by modulating its properties, such as amplitude, phase, and polarization, thereby creating distinct signals that can be converted into either 1s or 0s.

    So that's million gigabits per second ! :eek: So they can transfer signals by employing them as parallel sources. It also does not lose the characteristics of the comb that is used for spectrally effective data transfer despite the need to amplify the comb copies.

    All the "chips" that do the modulation, transmission, reception, and de-modulation are still there, but you've cut out all but one laser from the system. The chip is actually a CW laser.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    YouFilthyHippo said:
    You'd be hard pressed to convince me that global internet traffic is only 900TB/s. With the billions of phones, computers, servers, and big companies, I dont find it likely
    I think there was an error in interpreting the article. My reading is that 1.8 Pbps is twice what the world uses right now, meaning we're at 900 Tbps globally. Which means in a day, roughly 78 exabits of data gets transmitted.
    Metal Messiah. said:
    This one was actually an old news. Around last October 2022 they did this, I suppose. So have they updated something on this now ?
    I... have no answer. I was not responsible for this story. :)
    Reply
  • No worries. I have read this paper/article before, so I was just wondering if there was any new update on this tech or not ? But I couldn't find any updated part from these researchers.

    Edit:

    Paper's link:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-022-01082-z
    Reply
  • Stesmi
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    I think there was an error in interpreting the article. My reading is that 1.8 Tbps is twice was the world uses right now, meaning we're at 900 Tbps globally. Which means in a day, roughly 78 exabits of data gets transmitted.

    You mean 1.8Pbps :D

    And yes, that is how I read it as well.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    the same data transmission record had been previously broken back in August 2020 with a then-astonishing 178 Tbit/s (Terabits per second) — enough to download Netflix's then-existing catalog in less time than you could count a single Mississippi.
    @Francisco Alexandre Pires , where did this stat come from? If you divide 178 Tb (22.25 TB) by the single-layer DVD capacity of 4.7 GB, it's only 4734 discs! I'd bet Netfix probably has hundreds or thousands of times that much content.

    the initial design purpose wasn't to break the world's transmission throughput record
    Any idea what it was? I'm just wondering what else you'd use such an optical frequency comb for. Multi-spectral imaging?

    It's mind-blowing to think about so much information that it could strain a 100 Pbit/s connection
    I'd love to know the bisectional bandwidth of a modern datacenter. Because, that's the main application I see - being able to scale up datacenter applications across multiple sites. Exciting times!
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    bit_user said:
    @Francisco Alexandre Pires , where did this stat come from? If you divide 178 Tb (22.25 TB) by the single-layer DVD capacity of 4.7 GB, it's only 4734 discs! I'd bet Netfix probably has hundreds or thousands of times that much content.


    Any idea what it was? I'm just wondering what else you'd use such an optical frequency comb for. Multi-spectral imaging?


    I'd love to know the bisectional bandwidth of a modern datacenter. Because, that's the main application I see - being able to scale up datacenter applications across multiple sites. Exciting times!
    Then-existing? Maybe 2020 it had a lot less content. And DVD-only shows on Netflix don't count. So if it's only the stuff available for streaming in 2020, perhaps there wasn't that much stuff. I don't know. I mean, there's this site. That shows that the US Netflix library is currently only 6135 videos, I think.

    Even if those were all 4K 20Mbps videos, each 90 minutes long on average, that would be 83TB total capacity. And of course many of those videos are going to be 30 to 60 minutes long, so that could put the current storage capacity at closer to ~40TB.

    Netflix would of course have copies of all that data stored all over the world, and different libraries for other countries. But that's a different topic.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Then-existing? Maybe 2020 it had a lot less content. And DVD-only shows on Netflix don't count. So if it's only the stuff available for streaming in 2020, perhaps there wasn't that much stuff. I don't know. I mean, there's this site. That shows that the US Netflix library is currently only 6135 videos, I think.

    Even if those were all 4K 20Mbps videos, each 90 minutes long on average, that would be 83TB total capacity. And of course many of those videos are going to be 30 to 60 minutes long, so that could put the current storage capacity at closer to ~40TB.

    Netflix would of course have copies of all that data stored all over the world, and different libraries for other countries. But that's a different topic.
    Thanks for your thoughtful reply. It was a very specific claim, however. So, I had an expectation that there would be a good source backing it up.

    I'm not terribly concerned about it, but it surprised me enough that I thought I'd mention it.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    bit_user said:
    Thanks for your thoughtful reply. It was a very specific claim, however. So, I had an expectation that there would be a good source backing it up.

    I'm not terribly concerned about it, but it surprised me enough that I thought I'd mention it.
    The source for the claim is from the original 2020 record-breaking speed of 178 Tbps, where the researchers said that was fast enough to DL all of the Netflix catalog:

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/researchers-set-new-fiber-optic-speed-record-of-178-tbpshttps://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2020/aug/ucl-engineers-set-new-world-record-internet-speed
    I have no idea if that claim is remotely accurate, though it's probably not too far off. It might have taken two seconds, for example.
    Reply