Panram's DDR4 Memory Might Be Cheaper

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Niels Broekhuijsen
Contributing Writer

Niels Broekhuijsen is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He reviews cases, water cooling and pc builds.

  • dovah-chan
    Is Panram an EU brand? I've never seen them before here in the US. Neat looking modules I guess but really if you even have the option of getting DDR4 at this point you'll probably buy the high quality stuff.
    Reply
  • dovah-chan
    Turns out they're an asian OEM. Thanks google.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    50us for 4gb DEAL TO ME!
    Reply
  • pierrerock
    Am i the only one who thinks 2400 CL15 can't be better than DDR3 2400 CL10

    Here is an example : http://pcpartpicker.com/part/gskill-memory-f32400c10d8gzh

    So the only real advantage would be something like 2-3 Watt saved ? at 0.09 $/ Kilowatt-hour, this is not a big saving. (btw i am not sure for watt saved)
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    14058133 said:
    Am i the only one who thinks 2400 CL15 can't be better than DDR3 2400 CL10
    So the only real advantage would be something like 2-3 Watt saved ?
    The fastest DDR3 in the world does you no good if you want to build a system with an Haswell-E which only works with DDR4... if you want Haswell-E, you will need DDR4 no matter how much it may not seem to make sense at least for the time being.
    Reply
  • SchizoFrog
    DDR4 at DDR3 speeds, no wonder it is cheaper.
    Reply
  • Chris Droste
    pierre; right now top end DDR3 is going to be faster than early DDR4 because; Timings. right now this is only going to adopt power savings, and I've actually been curious personally why hasen't an OEM tried to do an X99/DDR3 board; much like the old days where you could get those boards that supported DDR1 and DDR2 on the same board, or simply supporting the older standard during this early phase. It's probably going to be late next year or even early 2016 before we see DDR4's bandwidth advantages outstripping Hot, O.C.'d DDR3 with Tight, sexy Timings. i wouldn't mind a budget X99-SLI board with only 4 DDR3 slots (2 on each side?) supporting up to 32GB of DDR3-3200(OC) to throw a 5820k on. it WOULD be kinda interesting to see what a 3 PCIe x9 (v3.0) slots would look like with a single PCIe 1x, hehe.
    Reply
  • christinebcw
    The industry can use some SERIOUS price reductions.
    Reply
  • dschnoz
    You're thinking of a time when the memory controller wasn't on chip. If Haswell-E doesnt support ddr3 then neither will any motherboard that supports Haswell-E.
    Reply
  • dschnoz
    You're thinking of a time when the memory controller wasn't on chip. If Haswell-E doesnt support ddr3 then neither will any motherboard that supports Haswell-E.
    Reply