Rock Pi X Offers Windows 10 on an SBC for $39 (Updated)
Updated, 9/13/19, 6:23 a.m. PT: Radxa responded to our request for comment, saying it currently has Windows 10 booting on the Rock Pi X and is working on getting the wireless connectivity working. It's also planning to add support for an additional display to the Rock Pi X with another DisplayPort connector. The company said it's hoping to have the device ready for a global launch by Christmas.
Original article, 9/12/19, 9:22 a.m. PT:
The single-board computer market is dominated by Arm processors. But there could be another Intel option available soon because CNX Software reported Wednesday that Radxa had developed a new device called the Rock Pi X, and it features an Intel Atom x5-Z8300 CPU.
CNX Software spotted benchmark results for a new device in the Hackerboards database for the Rock Pi X on September 11. There are reportedly two models on the way: a Model A that serves as the baseline product and a Model B with additional features. Those features include built-in 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.2 support, as well as Power Over Ethernet (PoE), managed by an extra HAT.
The Rock Pi X Model A and Model B are otherwise identical. They feature the previously mentioned Intel Atom x5-Z8300 processor clocked at 1.44 GHz; 1, 2 or 4GB LPDDR3-1866 memory; and one USB 3.0 port, three USB 2.0 ports, and one USB OTG Type-C port. Neither model includes any storage. They do offer a MicroSD card slot and eMMC socket, though, for people willing to supply their own storage devices.
CNX Software said the Rock Pi X would measure roughly 3.3 x 2 inches (85 x 52mm) without any casing. The device will reportedly feature a "40-pin Raspberry Pi compatible header with GPIOs, 2 x ADC, 2 x PWM, 2 x I2C" for people who already own Raspberry Pi accessories but want to see what a single-board computer featuring an Intel processor is like. There's a headphone jack and camera connector as well.
The biggest draw for the Rock Pi X would likely be the ability to install operating systems like Windows 10 and x86-optimized Linux distributions. It's technically possible to install Windows 10 on the Raspberry Pi, sure, but it's not a particularly compelling experience. A single-board computer featuring an x86 processor could theoretically fare better, but we can't pass judgment without trying it ourselves.
CNX Software reported that the Model A runs $39 (1GB), $49 (2GB) or $65 (4GB) while the Model A costs $49 (1GB), $59 (2GB) or $75 (4GB). It's not clear when Radxa plans to launch the device; its website hasn't yet been updated with information about the Rock Pi X.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.
-
mathew7 x86 would be good for flash and other linux plugins, but my experience with linux and atoms is TERRIBLE. Instead of using a Beelink HDMI stick, that would require me hours of tinkering to prepare it for HTPC, Core-M-based Intel Compute Stick was: install official Ubuntu ISO and everything works. Same with tablets...I use a Surface Go (just needed a wifi binary) and sold my Lenovo Tab 8.Reply -
BulkZerker Shame there isn't a 6/8 gb option. Even my dad multi tasks (if you count having 20 tabs open along with solitaire)Reply -
sunk818 There is also this Atomic Pi which is Intel Atom as well. You need some accessories to make it work obviously, but a resourceful crowd here and many of the things you need, you may already have lying around. (except maybe the barrel power adapter).Reply
https://www.amazon.com/Atomic-Pi-High-Speed-Peripheral/dp/B07N298F2B
It is an alternative to consider. I think ARM is interesting platform, but a lot of software is optimized for x86 still you likely get better performance (just because code is written for x86 vs ARM).