SSDs Kill The 15K HDD, Seagate Rolls Out Last Generation

The venerable 15K HDD is singing its swan song as Seagate introduces its sixth-generation Enterprise Performance 15K HDD v6, which will be the last mission-critical 15K HDD the company produces.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • takeshi7
    One of the advantages 15K HDDs have over SSDs that you failed to mention in the article is the write endurance is much higher for an HDD.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    18777916 said:
    One of the advantages 15K HDDs have over SSDs that you failed to mention in the article is the write endurance is much higher for an HDD.

    Well, here is an oddity... that common belief is both right and wrong.

    It all boils down to how much data you can actually write to the drive. This is called usable endurance. HDDs are so slow that they cannot write enough data over their lifespan to compete. Here is an excerpt from another site where I wrote a post covering this topic in 2013. The numbers are probably even more in favor for SSDs with the newer models.

    "While crunching the numbers it occurred to me that endurance isn't quite as clear-cut as one would expect. Taking a look at an entry-level SSD we see that an endurance of 3 DWPD (Drive Writes Per Day) is pretty standard for a random workload. The sequential workload endurance can be much higher, from 7-10 DWPD, depending upon the SSD. While the glass platter substrate of an HDD has a very high tolerance for heavy workloads, the mechanics of the moving parts conspire to hinder the speed, and thus the useable endurance of the drive. In our testing, the fastest 15K HDDs write at a speed of roughly 450 IOPS for both 4K and 8K random write workloads. For 4k this equates to roughly 148 GB's of data written per day. For 8K access, common to many server workloads, we arrive at roughly 296 GB of potential data written per day.

    An entry-level SAS SSD, by comparison, can provide over 30,000 IOPS of 4k write speed and 18,000 8K write IOPS in steady state. This equates to nearly 9.6 TB of potential data writes per day for 4K access, and 11.5 TB's per day for 8K write access. This is a huge advance over the HDD, and could necessitate throttling of the SSD to keep it within the expected warrantied workload of 3 DWPD. With the capacity of new SSDs touching 2TB, this can provide up to 6 TB of useable endurance per day for the SSD, in comparison to the lowly 148-296 GB attainable by today's fastest HDDs.

    The 2TB SSD can provide 10,950 TBs of 8K write activity (endurance) over the warrantied period of five years, compared to the HDD with 534 TBs.
    The slower speed of the HDD negates its ability to take advantage of its nearly-unlimited endurance, while the SSD can write nearly 20X more data over five years.
    "


    In a nutshell, SSDs offer up to 20X (and even more) usable endurance than HDDs.





    Reply
  • PC-Cobbler
    Seagate buy Micron? Not likely, given that Micron is bigger in every monetary respect. SK Hynix would be a possibility, but South Korea's chaibol culture might prevent that. I think it's much more likely for Seagate to partner with a Chinese fab, given its close ties to China (Seagate's job listings often ask for people who speak fluent Mandarin). Another possibility is Seagate being bought by a Chinese company such as Tsinghua or XMC.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    18777979 said:
    Seagate buy Micron? Not likely, given that Micron is bigger in every monetary respect. SK Hynix would be a possibility, but South Korea's chaibol culture might prevent that. I think it's much more likely for Seagate to partner with a Chinese fab, given its close ties to China (Seagate's job listings often ask for people who speak fluent Mandarin). Another possibility is Seagate being bought by a Chinese company such as Tsinghua or XMC.

    Tsinghua has already tried, for the record, to get their hooks into Micron. They are the persistent sort, so may try again after the failed bid to get SanDisk by buying into WD. http://www.tomsitpro.com/articles/wd-unisplendour-investment-acquisition-sandisk,1-3142.html

    This is also interesting - http://www.tomsitpro.com/articles/wd-unisplendour-jv-nand-fab,1-3015.html

    Micron has already taken measures to avoid a buyout from Tshinghua/XMC (now operating under the name Wuhan Xinxin Semiconductor Manufacturing). Read more here - http://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-ssd-flash-micron-china,32347.html

    Yes, the real surprise would be if Micron bought Seagate, which might be a possibility as it still hasn't finished the Inotera acquisition, which would likely leave it in too much debt to do so at favorable terms.

    I'm thinking merger. The present strategic alliance already has the two companies operating pretty closely together.

    i don't think XMC (et.al,) is interested in Seagate. Seagate with a NAND fab; yes. Seagate as-is; no way (imo). Tsinghua/Unisplendour is angling for NAND fabs, not spinning rust.

    (also, you did a good job of encapsulating the SK hynix issue-my thoughts exactly. SK hynix is too big, and I doubt they will sell off their strategic NAND assets)
    Reply
  • illuminatuz
    is it GB or Gb in the table?? GB is GigaByte and Gb is Gigabit.. can anybody please confirm?
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    18778022 said:
    is it GB or Gb in the table?? GB is GigaByte and Gb is Gigabit.. can anybody please confirm?
    Gah. Fixed.
    Reply
  • jaber2
    Kill it already
    Reply
  • takeshi7
    18777973 said:
    18777916 said:
    One of the advantages 15K HDDs have over SSDs that you failed to mention in the article is the write endurance is much higher for an HDD.

    Well, here is an oddity... that common belief is both right and wrong.

    It all boils down to how much data you can actually write to the drive. This is called usable endurance. HDDs are so slow that they cannot write enough data over their lifespan to compete. Here is an excerpt from another site where I wrote a post covering this topic in 2013. The numbers are probably even more in favor for SSDs with the newer models.

    "While crunching the numbers it occurred to me that endurance isn't quite as clear-cut as one would expect. Taking a look at an entry-level SSD we see that an endurance of 3 DWPD (Drive Writes Per Day) is pretty standard for a random workload. The sequential workload endurance can be much higher, from 7-10 DWPD, depending upon the SSD. While the glass platter substrate of an HDD has a very high tolerance for heavy workloads, the mechanics of the moving parts conspire to hinder the speed, and thus the useable endurance of the drive. In our testing, the fastest 15K HDDs write at a speed of roughly 450 IOPS for both 4K and 8K random write workloads. For 4k this equates to roughly 148 GB's of data written per day. For 8K access, common to many server workloads, we arrive at roughly 296 GB of potential data written per day.

    An entry-level SAS SSD, by comparison, can provide over 30,000 IOPS of 4k write speed and 18,000 8K write IOPS in steady state. This equates to nearly 9.6 TB of potential data writes per day for 4K access, and 11.5 TB's per day for 8K write access. This is a huge advance over the HDD, and could necessitate throttling of the SSD to keep it within the expected warrantied workload of 3 DWPD. With the capacity of new SSDs touching 2TB, this can provide up to 6 TB of useable endurance per day for the SSD, in comparison to the lowly 148-296 GB attainable by today's fastest HDDs.

    The 2TB SSD can provide 10,950 TBs of 8K write activity (endurance) over the warrantied period of five years, compared to the HDD with 534 TBs.
    The slower speed of the HDD negates its ability to take advantage of its nearly-unlimited endurance, while the SSD can write nearly 20X more data over five years.
    "


    In a nutshell, SSDs offer up to 20X (and even more) usable endurance than HDDs.

    OK, that makes sense. I will revise my original statement to HDDs have vastly higher sequential write endurance.

    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    18778193 said:
    18777973 said:
    18777916 said:
    One of the advantages 15K HDDs have over SSDs that you failed to mention in the article is the write endurance is much higher for an HDD.

    snip

    OK, that makes sense. I will revise my original statement to HDDs have vastly higher sequential write endurance.

    Actually, that might not be true, though I would have to work the math out...but enterprise SSDs are much much faster with sequential data, and SSD endurance increases by a factor of 7 to 10x with sequential workloads. So, nope. HDDs still lose.

    Reply
  • Christopher Gehlke
    seagate already sucks enough, we don't need anyone buying them from China or whatever making them 50x crappier.
    Reply