SK hynix Takeover of Intel NAND Business Clears Final Hurdle in China

SK hynix NAND chips
(Image credit: SK hynix)
3

SK hynix had indicated to shareholders that its acquisition of Intel's NAND business would complete before the end of 2021. It appears to have made it by the skin of its teeth, as Chinese regulators have today given the green light to the deal. China was the last of eight jurisdictions that needed to pass the deal before it could be done, however it has attached six conditions which SK hynix must agree to.

"SK hynix sincerely welcomes and appreciates the (Chinese) State Administration for Market Regulation's merger clearance for the deal," said the South Korean tech firm in a statement. "SK hynix will enhance its competitiveness of NAND Flash and SSD business by continuing the remaining post-merger integration process."

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • watzupken
    I feel there's little risk here for China since this is being transferred out from a US firm, to a Korean firm. On the contrary, if it was a Korean to US firm, I think it may be more problematic for China due to all the sanctions against them. So I suspect Nvidia's ARM acquisition may not make it past the Chinese regulator.
    Reply
  • renz496
    watzupken said:
    I feel there's little risk here for China since this is being transferred out from a US firm, to a Korean firm. On the contrary, if it was a Korean to US firm, I think it may be more problematic for China due to all the sanctions against them. So I suspect Nvidia's ARM acquisition may not make it past the Chinese regulator.

    Doesn't matter if nvidia get ARM or not. China already got some issues with ARM as it is.
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    "Intel won't completely exit the memory business, as it will retain the lucrative Optane memory business."

    I thought Intel had dumped Optane as well.
    Reply