TeamGroup Reveals First PCIe 5.0 x4 SSD for PCs, Over 13 GBps
TeamGroup unveils T-Force Cardea PCIe 5.0 SSD for consumers.
TeamGroup has announced one of the industry's first SSDs with a PCIe 5.0 x4 connection that is designed for client PCs. To maximize its compatibility with various systems, the T-Force Cardea PCIe Gen5 drive comes with two heat spreaders that users can install themselves: an aluminum heatsink for desktop PCs as well as a graphene heatsink for laptops and small form-factor desktops.
TeamGroup says that its T-Force Cardea PCIe Gen5 SSD is rated for maximum sequential read speeds of over 13,000 MB/s and write speeds exceeding 12,000 MB/s (performance levels that will probably make it one of the best SSDs when it hits the market later this year). Being aimed at premium PCs running AMD's next-generation AM5 CPUs or Intel's Alder Lake or Raptor Lake processors, the new drives will be available in capacities of up to 4TB.
TeamGroup didn't disclose which controller it uses for its PCIe 5.0 SSD but says it's NVMe 2.0 compliant. Meanwhile, the image of the drive features a small and square controller without a built-in aluminum heat spreader, which implies a chip made using a fairly advanced process technology that doesn't generate much heat. However, the image might be for illustrative purposes only.
Perhaps, the most disappointing thing about TeamGroup's T-Force Cardea PCIe Gen5 SSD is that it won't be available until sometime in the third quarter (July – September), so enthusiasts building Alder Lake-based systems today will not be able to take advantage of this drive in the near term.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Friesiansam You need to correct the the title of the article. Over13TBs would be remarkable but, is completely impossible and, you do quote 13,000MBs (13GBs) in the article.Reply