Vertigo Games Explains Core i7 Exclusivity For 'Arizona Sunshine'

On December 6, alongside the Oculus Touch controllers, Vertigo Games finally launched its highly anticipated first-person VR zombie survival game, Arizona Sunshine. The overzealous reaction of the Reddit VR community to an apparent exclusivity deal marred what should have been the exciting launch of a AAA VR shooter. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.

  • blppt
    Theoretically, then, wouldnt this be a game that shines on an 8 core Bulldozer/Steamroller? It actually has 8 physical (granted, weaker) cores, so you would think that with the advanced physics on, 8 physical cores would trump 4 physical + 4 virtual. Not really sure why they make no mention of any AMD cpu in the system requirements.
    Reply
  • neblogai
    Cores on Bulldozer are only about half as strong as Intel cores. With Bulldozer, it would be difficult to run at high framerate required for VR, and not enough power for physics like on i5s. Zen, on the other hand, should be ~4 times the power than same clocked Bulldozer.
    Reply
  • hotsacoman
    I should have no problem running this on my 486. It can run Ski-Free at 60 fps and that's as close to real skiing as we're ever gonna get.
    Reply
  • stoned_ritual
    Something happened, Reddit in an outrage. News? Nope.
    Reply
  • bgunner
    19007024 said:
    Theoretically, then, wouldnt this be a game that shines on an 8 core Bulldozer/Steamroller? It actually has 8 physical (granted, weaker) cores, so you would think that with the advanced physics on, 8 physical cores would trump 4 physical + 4 virtual. Not really sure why they make no mention of any AMD cpu in the system requirements.

    On this you are wrong. the AMD FX "8 core" CPU's are not actual 8 core CPU's. They are actually a 4 core with 2 treads running on each core just like Intel. AMD actually got sued for labeling its CPU's as 8 core CPU's when in fact they were not.

    Due to Intel's core's higher IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) they are actually better than AMD's allowing for an I5 4 core CPU to actually beat the 8 core AMD CPU's in most work loads.

    My point is that AMD's 8000 and 9000 series CPU's are not true 8 core CPU's but actually 4 physical cores and 4 logical cores. This is AMD marketing at its best.
    Reply
  • Sam Bittermann
    They may be technically right but they should have put it in the hands of the gamer to decide what works best and what doesn't. It was a poor decision at best on their part. You get ONE shot at release to get it right. When has restricted choices ever been a good thing.
    Reply
  • hellwig
    No physical? We've reverted more than a decade to when all physics had to be done on a cpu? Sounds idiotic to me.
    Reply
  • beshonk
    I don't see how this is different from an xbox one or PS4 exclusivity deal. Different hardware gets different games. I think exclusivity is stupid, since the developers can't market to their entire audience. Regardless, just because it's on PC doesn't mean there can't be exclusivity.
    Reply
  • kcarbotte
    19007024 said:
    Theoretically, then, wouldnt this be a game that shines on an 8 core Bulldozer/Steamroller? It actually has 8 physical (granted, weaker) cores, so you would think that with the advanced physics on, 8 physical cores would trump 4 physical + 4 virtual. Not really sure why they make no mention of any AMD cpu in the system requirements.

    They did cut a deal with Intel for support, so I expect they didn't do any AMD platform testing.
    Reply
  • kcarbotte
    19007598 said:
    No physical? We've reverted more than a decade to when all physics had to be done on a cpu? Sounds idiotic to me.

    Unity doesn't support GPU-based physics.
    Reply