AMD's Zen 6-based desktop processors may feature up to 24 cores

AMD Ryzen CPU
(Image credit: AMD)

AMD’s upcoming Zen 6 processors will remain compatible with AM5, but they are set to introduce a new chiplet-based CPU design and significantly boost core counts across desktop and laptop products, according to sources of ChipHell, as well as Moore's Law Is Dead. Premium processors for gamers will also feature 3D V-Cache.

AMD's next-generation Ryzen processors based on the Zen 6 microarchitecture will feature 12-core core chiplet dies (CCDs), marking a major shift from eight-core CCDs used in Zen 3/4/5 generation processors, if the linked reports are accurate. As a result, desktop AM5 processors will be able to feature up to 24 cores. Meanwhile, advanced laptop APUs will transition from a four Zen 5 eight Zen 5c (8+4) configuration to a 12-core structure, at least according to MLID. A Zen 6 CCD is 75mm^2 large, MLID claims.

Now, the increased number of cores is a big deal. However, premium versions of AMD's desktop processors will feature up to 96MB of L3 cache, which is 4MB per core. 4MB per core is in line with existing Zen 5 configurations, so AMD does not cut down caches in favor of core count.

AMD is expected to release Zen 6-based products in 2026, so it is reasonable to expect them to use a more advanced node than they use today (TSMC's 4nm-class), so think TSMC's N3P (3nm-class) given that AMD does exactly use leading-edge nodes (possibly due to supply constraints), which will be N2 (2nm-class) next year.

AMD's Zen 6-based Ryzens for gaming PCs will also feature 3D V-Cache. Some laptop processors with built-in graphics will also feature 3D V-Cache, though exact configuration is something that remains to be seen.

AMD Medusa Point and Medusa Ridge

Interestingly, and according to MLID, AMD's standard APUs will be chiplet-based, moving away from the monolithic approach. Medusa Point — a laptop APU — is expected to feature a Zen 6 CCD with 12 cores and a 200mm^2 I/O die (IOD), featuring eight RDNA work groups, a 128-bit memory controller, and a large NPU. There is speculation that Infinity Cache may be added to enhance GPU performance.

MLID also claims that the desktop version of Medusa Point — allegedly called Medusa Ridge — will use up to two 12-core Zen 6 CCD in the AM5 form-factor. That product will have a 155mm^2 IOD without an advanced built-in GPU, but possibly with a large NPU.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

Read more
Dragon Range
AMD Zen 5 Fire Range CPU surfaces inside next-gen gaming laptop — Ryzen 9000HX chip seemingly wields 16 Zen 5 cores
AMD CPU Family
Here's all the silicon AMD launched at CES 2025 - family die photos of Strix Halo, Krackan Point, Ryzen 9000X3D, Fire Range, and Hawk Point Refresh
Threadripper
AMD preps 32-core and 64-core Threadripper 9000 CPUs — Shimada Peak resurfaces once again
AMD Fire Range
AMD Launches ‘Fire Range’ HX3D mobile processor with game-boosting 3D V-Cache, other HX Series SKUs built on Zen 5 desktop CPU silicon
AMD
Zen 5-based Threadripper 9000 CPU shipping manifest hints at imminent launch
Ryzen CPU
AMD breathes life into Ryzen 5000G family with six new chips — Cezanne with up to eight Zen 3 cores and 4.6 GHz boost clocks
Latest in CPUs
Tech Deals
AMD's non-X3D Ryzen 9 9950X processor hits an all-time low in Amazon's Big Spring Sale 2025
Ryzen 5 9600X
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X hits all-time low price
Core Ultra 200S CPU
An Arrow Lake refresh may still be in the cards with only K and KF models, claims leaker
Tech Deals
Our alternate pick for the best gaming CPU is $190 cheaper than the 9800X3D right now - pick up the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X for just $289
ASRock fixes AM5 motherboard by cleaning it
ASRock claims to fix 'burned out' AM5 motherboard by cleaning the socket
Ryzen AI
AMD's Gorgon Point APU line-up breaks cover — Allegedly aiming for a 2026 launch
Latest in News
Intel
Ex-Intel CEO Gelsinger warns TSMC's $165B investment will not restore U.S. semiconductor leadership
ReFS in Windows 11 preview build installer
New Windows file system option supports up to 35 petabyte volumes — ReFS appears in latest Insider build
New Windows 11 Game Bar Update
Microsoft updates the Windows Game Bar to be more user friendly with PC Handhelds
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi Pico fightstick randomly mashes buttons for fighting game combos
The world's first color e-paper display over 30-inches
Mass production of 'world's first' color e-paper display over 30-inches begins
RTX 4090 48GB
Blower-style RTX 4090 48GB teardown reveals dual-sided memory configuration — PCB design echoes the RTX 3090
  • Thunder64
    MLID is a clown.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    It makes sense considering Intel’s hybrid approach giving them an edge in core count; 16 cores is not gonna cut it for the top offering in 2026.
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    Just make the Threadripper cheaper please ?
    Reply
  • setx
    desktop version ... will have a 155mm^2 IOD without an advanced built-in GPU, but possibly with a large NPU
    Please no! I want proper GPU, not useless NPU.
    Leave the NPUs for stupid "AI PC" laptops.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Elusive Ruse said:
    16 cores is not gonna cut it for the top offering in 2026.
    except in gaming it doesn't matter (no game really ever uses over 8)...and if you want productivity TR already exists (even if not as modern still monstrous)
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    hotaru251 said:
    except in gaming it doesn't matter (no game really ever uses over 8)...and if you want productivity TR already exists (even if not as modern still monstrous)
    I disagree . Threadrippers are expensive for small businesses. entry level 24 cores Ryzens are welcomed.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    I could see a 12 core CCD on the horizon, but my concern becomes the cost of entry factor. The lowest available consumer chips have launched at relatively high prices since Zen 3 and now those core counts would be higher. While I'm sure there's plenty of margin on all of these parts it would mean AMD eating into them a bit to keep current pricing given a newer node and larger die.

    The other concern comes in at the top end with the question of memory bandwidth. Currently they're supporting 16 cores on 5200/5600 and this would go up to 24 cores on 6400 most likely (though with clock drivers having better availability maybe 7200). That means a 50% core count increase while adding 14-29% bandwidth. It's not guaranteed that this will be a problem, but it was starting to be an issue with Zen 3 (resolved with the move to DDR5 with Zen 4+).

    Overall moving the 8 core parts to 12 would be a pretty nice MT benefit, and the lower dual CCD part would no longer be hampered by 6 core CCDs so that's good as well. It's just at the low and high end where questions remain.

    Of course without more PCIe lanes or at least a PCIe 5.0 link to the chipset(s) the productivity improvements brought with higher core counts is still lacking.
    Reply
  • Li Ken-un
    thestryker said:
    Of course without more PCIe lanes or at least a PCIe 5.0 link to the chipset(s) the productivity improvements brought with higher core counts is still lacking.
    This is probably the biggest sore in the current crop of AM5 chipsets. I can’t believe motherboard manufacturers are boasting about having three extra PCIe 4.0 M.2 slots, when they are all funneled through a single PCIe 4.0 \00d7 4 link, shared with all the SATA, USB, LAN, and Wi-Fi traffic. It’s not even unrealistic that one might occasionally utilize all of the bandwidth available and bottleneck one thing or another.

    It’s the same situation with Thunderbolt 5, the only implementation being a controller with a PCIe 4.0 \00d7 4 (nominally 64 Gb/s) host interface, which falls short supporting the even basic 80 Gb/s of data (a.k.a., no video) traffic of a single Thunderbolt connection.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    hotaru251 said:
    except in gaming it doesn't matter (no game really ever uses over 8)...and if you want productivity TR already exists (even if not as modern still monstrous)
    This post doesn’t make sense, especially as a retort to my statement.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    thestryker said:
    I could see a 12 core CCD on the horizon, but my concern becomes the cost of entry factor. The lowest available consumer chips have launched at relatively high prices since Zen 3 and now those core counts would be higher.
    A couple of points:
    Zen 5 will probably have a long production life, just as AMD is continuing to sell Zen 3 CPUs for the budget-conscious, today.
    AMD can continue to offer APUs as the lower-tier of their AM5 offerings.
    thestryker said:
    The other concern comes in at the top end with the question of memory bandwidth. Currently they're supporting 16 cores on 5200/5600 and this would go up to 24 cores on 6400 most likely (though with clock drivers having better availability maybe 7200). That means a 50% core count increase while adding 14-29% bandwidth. It's not guaranteed that this will be a problem, but it was starting to be an issue with Zen 3 (resolved with the move to DDR5 with Zen 4+).
    Fair points, but not everything on Zen 5 is memory-bottlenecked, today. Some things that are already limited would continue to bottleneck on DDR5-7200 (or faster!) with just 16 cores, yet other things still wouldn't be memory-bottlenecked at even 24 cores on DDR5-5600.

    Basically, the more memory-bound you become, the lower the value proposition. It doesn't mean the value proposition is zero, because not everything is totally memory-bottlenecked, and for some users with low-bandwidth apps, the value would be quite high.

    When AMD launched ThreadRipper Pro, Anandtech investigated the impact of running 64 cores on 4 channels vs. 8 and found that rendering workloads tended not to be much affected by running 16 cores per channel vs. 8. In fact, some gained more performance from the no-Pro's additional clockspeed than they lost from its halving of memory bandwidth!https://www.anandtech.com/show/16805/amd-threadripper-pro-review-an-upgrade-over-regular-threadripper/3
    Granted, that's using lower-throughput, lower-clocked Zen 2 cores, but I fully expect the same workloads aren't substantially bandwidth-limited on Zen 5, either.

    Also, 3D-VCache should help some of those workloads which are. Now, they just need to give us a 3D cache die on both CCDs!

    thestryker said:
    Overall moving the 8 core parts to 12 would be a pretty nice MT benefit,
    AMD hasn't really mounted a proper response to Raptor Lake's core count increase, IMO. And we're nearing a point where Intel is rumored to be turning the dial up again. Zen 4 and DDR5 really helped, as did Zen 5's dual-decoder architecture, but AMD has lost the big lead it once had in MT performance (i.e. from the Zen 2 and early Zen 3 era) and needs to do more, to stay competitive.

    However, I think this really isn't even about desktop, so much as server. We'd do well to keep in mind that most things happening with CCDs are really about server CPUs, with performance desktop & laptops being downstream beneficiaries. I think AMD is really looking to scale up full-fat Zen 6 to 192 cores, and after 4 generations of the 8-core CCD, it's finally time to bump it up to the next step.

    thestryker said:
    Of course without more PCIe lanes or at least a PCIe 5.0 link to the chipset(s) the productivity improvements brought with higher core counts is still lacking.
    I see them as separate issues. Yes, the chipset link should absolutely be PCIe 5.0. I always thought that's the place that made the most sense to upgrade, first. Let's hope Zen 6 will bring that to AM5, just like Zen 2 brought PCIe 4.0 to AM4.
    Reply