Arrow Lake die shot shows off the details of Intel's chiplet-based design

Core Ultra 200S CPU
(Image credit: Intel)

Die shots of Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture have been published, revealing Intel’s chiplet (tile) infused design in all of its glory. Andreas Schiling on X shared several images of Arrow Lake up close, revealing the layout of Arrow Lake’s individual tiles and the layout of the cores inside the compute tile.

The first photo exposes the full die of Intel’s desktop Core Ultra 200S series CPUs, with the compute tile on the upper left, the IO tile on the bottom, and the SoC tile and GPU tile on the right. To the bottom left and top right are two filler dies designed to provide structural rigidity.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • bit_user
    The article said:
    The compute die is fabbed on TSMC’s bleeding-edge N3B node,
    No, it wasn't bleeding edge. Apple was already shipping M3-series SoCs on it for like 8 or 10 months, by the time it launched and was in the process of finalizing the M4-series on N3E. Intel's own Lunar Lake launched on N3B, months earlier.

    The article said:
    Intel’s first attempt at a desktop chiplet-based competitor has not been well received
    It's not their first attempt. That was Meteor Lake-S, which they cancelled. There are even Meteor Lake-S engineering samples floating around, proving that they got quite far before pulling the plug on it.

    The distinction isn't mere nit-picking. It means that, while they were finishing Arrow Lake, they already had an idea of what issues and challenges they would face. Maybe it was still too late to do much about them, but that's different than going in completely blind.

    The article said:
    and 3MB of L2 cache per E-core cluster, with 1.5MB shared between two cores directly.
    First, each E-core cluster has 4 MB of L2 cache. Aaron obviously just glanced at the image (missing the 1 MB slice, in the process) and not the actual specs. Otherwise, wouldn't have made that error.

    Second, nowhere does the original author (High Yield) ever say that the 1.5 MB slices are specifically shared between the two E-cores on either side of them. If Aaron just took a wild guess that's what was happening, he really shouldn't do that.

    I'll do you a favor and link exactly the part of the vid where the author talks about the E-cores, so you can see/hear for yourself. It's pretty short (only about 16 seconds), at 13:04.
    wusyYscQi0o:784View: https://youtu.be/wusyYscQi0o?t=784
    Better yet, I found some evidence that the E-cores don't have preferential access to the 1.0 or 1.5 MB L2 slices adjacent to them. If they did, then there should be a corresponding bump in this graph. Instead, it's flat all the way out to 4096 kiB:

    Source: https://chipsandcheese.com/p/skymont-in-desktop-form-atom-unleashed
    It's also kinda weird that Aaron only linked to Andres' tweet, which was nothing more than a couple frame grabs from that Youtube video and a link to the youtuber's account. He could've just linked straight to the video and included his own frame grabs of it.

    Tagging @PaulAlcorn and @JarredWaltonGPU . I hope we can see better fact-checking, in the future.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Kind of late to build hype and excitement for Arrow Lake now. :ROFLMAO:
    Reply
  • bit_user
    DS426 said:
    Kind of late to build hype and excitement for Arrow Lake now. :ROFLMAO:
    Yeah, I've seen die shots of it that came out, before. I haven't gone back and tried to compare them, but I know it's not easy to make these photos and I think the more the merrier!
    : D
    I think I read they have to actually run the de-lidded CPU and use an infrared sensor, or else you wouldn't see much.

    Edit: here, I found them.
    https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/asus-shares-official-die-shots-of-the-core-ultra-9-285k-in-depth-annotations-break-down-intels-disaggregated-approach
    Reply
  • DS426
    bit_user said:
    Yeah, I've seen die shots of it that came out, before. I haven't gone back and tried to compare them, but I know it's not easy to ...
    My silliness aside, I agree: the more, the merrier! :) Indeed it sounds like it's quite hard to get good die shots.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    LGA 1366 the last time they did a one and done socket/chipset?

    I think LGA 775/771 had some life in it beyond the consumer chips.
    Reply
  • usertests
    All Intel desktop CPUs for the foreseeable future are going to be made of chiplets like this. Hopefully they can make some of their own next time.

    Is it just me, or does that Media Engine look huge? Isn't that what's handling video decode/encode?
    Reply
  • oninoshiko
    Who would ever buy a glued together chip!? /s
    Reply
  • usertests
    oninoshiko said:
    Who would ever buy a glued together chip!? /s
    Someone looking for power efficiency, somehow. Arrow Lake is said to be more efficient than Raptor Lake at lower TDPs.
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    usertests said:
    Someone looking for power efficiency, somehow. Arrow Lake is said to be more efficient than Raptor Lake at lower TDPs.

    You missed the joke. Years ago Intel said AMD was essentially inferior for using "glue". I guess this was during the Zen 2 days.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Thunder64 said:
    You missed the joke. Years ago Intel said AMD was essentially inferior for using "glue". I guess this was during the Zen 2 days.
    I already hit Like for the joke.

    Sniffing the glue is obviously the root cause of the latency problems, and overall performance loss is from using less aggressive voltages than Raptor Lake.
    Reply