Raptor Lake Refresh non-K CPUs are seemingly more expensive than prior-gen models — overseas retailer lists non-K CPUs ahead of launch

Intel Core i7-13700K
(Image credit: Intel)

Spanish online retailer CoolMod has published many new non-K Raptor Lake Refresh listings, including pricing information, giving us a good idea of what pricing might look like in America. Being from a Spanish retailer, the pricing includes VAT. The new models CoolMod listed four i9 and i7 non-K SKUs, three new Core i5 non-K SKUs, and two i3 models.

Converted to USD, the i9 models listed include the i9-14900, priced at $664, and the i9-14900F (its IGPless twin), priced at $637. The i7 models include the i7-14700 and i7-14700F, priced at $454 and $426, respectively. The i5 models consist of three models: the i5-14500, priced at $27; the 14400, priced at the same value as the i5-14500; and the 14400F, priced at $243. The two i3 models listed include the i3-14100 and 14100F, priced at $166 and $138, respectively.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Raptor Lake Refresh Non-K Listings
CPUPricePrice Converted to USD
Core i9-14900€599.95$664.39
Core i9-14900F€574.96$636.72
Core i7-14700€409.95$453.98
Core i7-14700F€384.95$426.30
Core i5-14500€249.95$276.80
Core i5-14400€249.95$276.80
Core i5-14400F€219.95$243.57
Core i3-14100€149.96$166.07
Core i3-14100F€124.94$138.36

The pricing structure for the new non-K SKUs is very similar to Intel's last several generations of Intel Core chips, with the K SKUs being roughly $50 more expensive than their non-K counterparts. The same goes for the F-series SKUs, which are approximately $20-$30 cheaper than their vanilla counterparts due to the lack of integrated graphics.

However, the one thing that isn't similar is the overall pricing of these new chips, which is noticeably higher than their 13th-generation counterparts at their original MSRP. (Let alone the highly discounted prices they are at today.) This is especially clear in the lower i5 and i3 lineups, with the Core i5-14400F costing well over $200 and the i3-14100 costing almost as much as an i5-12400F at MSRP.

Sadly, these higher prices have been expected for some time, with rumors dating as far back as August predicting a 15% price hike for these new Raptor Lake Refresh chips, which turned out to be inaccurate when the 14900K, 14700K, and 14600K came out. However, the higher prices may extend to the non-K SKUs.

That said, it's worth taking this new information with a dose of salt since this further pricing information is from a Spanish retailer and not an actual retailer in the U.S. So, pricing could increase by several percent based on shipping costs and taxes.

The vanilla non-K Raptor Lake Refresh parts will struggle to compete with AMD's latest Ryzen 7000 series chips and even Intel's own older 13th Gen counterparts due to the minuscule performance improvements we've already seen with the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture on the 14900K, 14700K, and 14600K.

Aaron Klotz
Freelance News Writer

Aaron Klotz is a freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering news topics related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    I don't think this would be a shock to anyone. Increase in cost for nothing new or added. AMD have done it recently, now Intel.

    What seems odd to me though, is I have seen builds of current users which had 13900k, and then swapped up (or sideways) to 14900k. I just don't get why someone would fall for that. Same here, with the non k sku's. Nothing over the last gen, only an increase in CPU cost. DOH!
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    I don't think this would be a shock to anyone. Increase in cost for nothing new or added. AMD have done it recently, now Intel.

    What seems odd to me though, is I have seen builds of current users which had 13900k, and then swapped up (or sideways) to 14900k. I just don't get why someone would fall for that. Same here, with the non k sku's. Nothing over the last gen, only an increase in CPU cost. DOH!
    Sidegrades, I have a 13900 myself (non K). If I can sell and upgrade for nearly the same price, why not?

    Some people like to be on the modern highest end and have the money to burn. Also with Arrow Lake potentially being a year out and meteor lake currently showing a bit underwhelming at high power/high performance, we could be facing a gap year similar to what was experienced on 10900k, where the 11900k was not a true uplift (Many cases performance worst).

    New gen brings a little boost and APO, but you are right, very small gen on gen improvement... but at least its not a regression:sneaky:
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    I don't think this would be a shock to anyone. Increase in cost for nothing new or added. AMD have done it recently, now Intel.
    The retailers are marking them up because they aren't even out yet, it's the same that happened with amd and what happens with every single thing that comes out, someone always lists it first for higher than what it will cost when actually released.
    Reply
  • Flayed
    It wouldn't surprise me if the USD price matches the Euro price 1:1
    Reply
  • Kashmir74
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    I don't think this would be a shock to anyone. Increase in cost for nothing new or added. AMD have done it recently, now Intel.

    What seems odd to me though, is I have seen builds of current users which had 13900k, and then swapped up (or sideways) to 14900k. I just don't get why someone would fall for that. Same here, with the non k sku's. Nothing over the last gen, only an increase in CPU cost. DOH!
    Simply because 14900K is +1000 better than 13900K, it's simple math.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Kashmir74 said:
    Simply because 14900K is +1000 better than 13900K, it's simple math.
    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.htmlIt's not one single number, it's one generation number and one sku number.
    So it's only 1 better.
    Reply
  • Kashmir74
    As shown, you can read it as processor number.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    cyrusfox said:
    Sidegrades, I have a 13900 myself (non K). If I can sell and upgrade for nearly the same price, why not?
    True.
    Kashmir74 said:
    Simply because 14900K is +1000 better than 13900K, it's simple math.
    I presume you are being sarcastic there!?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    cyrusfox said:
    Some people like to be on the modern highest end and have the money to burn.
    I think the amount of people who do annual upgrades is quite a small, if vocal slice of the overall market.

    However, there is a certain upgrade path which I think is justifiable. Say have a 12th or 13th gen i5. Then, you want some more horsepower. Here's where picking up a 14th gen i7 or i9 could make sense.

    cyrusfox said:
    at least its not a regression:sneaky:
    Seriously? Since when are we handing out bonus points for not releasing a product that's just objectively bad??
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    bit_user said:
    Seriously? Since when are we handing out bonus points for not releasing a product that's just objectively bad??
    Since the Nvidia 4000, have you met the 4060 ti? it loses to the 3060 ti a couple instances (Reddit post about it).
    For CPU's Earliest I remember was Bulldozer vs the 6 core Phenom (also performance regression) as well as Comet to Rocket Lake I spoke of. And from what meteor has shown thus far, there is likely a good reason we are not seeing it on the desktop to avoid repeating that embarrassment.
    Reply