Nvidia CEO recognized for high-powered GPUs and the AI revolution — Jensen Huang elected to National Academy of Engineering

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
(Image credit: Nvidia)

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has been elected to the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). This is one of the highest academic distinctions that can be awarded to engineers. The Nvidia CEO’s specific “outstanding contributions” to the world of engineering were in the fields of GPUs and AI, a fact which shouldn't come as much of a surprise.

National Academy of Engineering - Welcome

(Image credit: National Academy of Engineering)

Every year a new intake of members is elected to the NAE after a several months-long selection process. Specific qualities, achievements, and contributions made by any potential members are judged. The academy aims to honor only those who have made outstanding contributions to the following fields:

  • engineering research, practice, or education
  • engineering literature
  • pioneering of new and developing fields of technology
  • making major advancements in traditional fields of engineering
  • developing and / or implementing innovative approaches to engineering education

The NAE publishes a brief description of each of the newly elected members, providing their name, current or most recent vocation, as well as a sentence outlining the achievements that meant they were elected. It credits the Nvidia CEO “[f]or high-powered graphics processing units, fueling the artificial intelligence revolution.”

We can’t argue about the NAE’s description. Nvidia’s GPUs are indeed high-powered and highly desirable for data scientists, enterprises, and researchers. Of course, Nvidia is also behind some of the best graphics cards available to consumers, too. It is also easy to credit Nvidia will fueling, and even inspiring, many AI-based developments and trends. Other big tech businesses might commonly announce that they will be eschewing GPUs in favor of custom AI accelerators. Still, the demand for Nvidia’s adaptable products continues to outpace any hope of fulfilling supply.

As mentioned in the intro, being elected to the NAE is among the highest professional distinctions accorded to an engineer. This February’s intake results from a yearlong selection process, culminating in a ballot in December. Huang was one of 114 new members and 21 international members announced on Tuesday.

The new NAE members list is packed full of engineering luminaries, but there was no other new admission for contributions to computer graphics, and we only spotted one more member who was recognized for AI. The SVP and director of research at IBM Research, Dario Gil, is also set to be inducted into the NAE. Gil is credited with accomplishments in the “advancement and practical use of artificial intelligence and quantum computing in industry and society.”

It won’t be until September 29 when the newly elected class, including Huang, will be formally inducted to the NAE. In total, there will be 2,310 U.S. members and 332 international members once the induction ceremony is complete.

Mark Tyson
Freelance News Writer

Mark Tyson is a Freelance News Writer at Tom's Hardware US. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • bit_user
    So, does this esteemed academy actually do anything, or is it sort of like a Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, but for engineers?

    Also, I have to wonder if inducting Huang is more about building a name for NAE than actually honoring Huang. I sometimes get a similar sense, when a college or university bestows an honorary degree, yet they're a lot more obscure than the celebrity they're anointing.

    I also find it kind of funny, because I think Huang himself would even admit that most of the technical contributions to Nvidia's GPUs came from others. As a matter of fact, I only see his name on 4 patents (2014-2016) around G-Sync and a game controller. I have more than that! ; )
    Reply
  • Giroro
    This definitely has the desperate "This is really stupid" vibe of one of Jensen's publicists' pathetic weekly attempts at a viral publicity stunt.
    I would get annoyed, but flame-baiting for attention/clicks is the entire point of all Jensen stories - and most 'news' in general, isn't it?
    It's exhausting. I'm tired.
    Reply
  • dalek1234
    Jensen's over inflated ego doesn't need more air
    Reply
  • helper800
    bit_user said:
    So, does this esteemed academy actually do anything, or is it sort of like a Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, but for engineers?

    Also, I have to wonder if inducting Huang is more about building a name for NAE than actually honoring Huang. I sometimes get a similar sense, when a college or university bestows an honorary degree, yet they're a lot more obscure than the celebrity they're anointing.

    I also find it kind of funny, because I think Huang himself would even admit that most of the technical contributions to Nvidia's GPUs came from others. As a matter of fact, I only see his name on 4 patents (2014-2016) around G-Sync and a game controller. I have more than that! ; )
    How relevant is the number of patents anyways? One can easily get 10 or 20 patents via buying the rights to them or spending a few weeks with an engineer and a lawyer. There is a reason patent trolling is such an issue, because among other things, it's so easy to get them.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    helper800 said:
    How relevant is the number of patents anyways?
    It tells you who the inventors are, behind their key IP. I think it's a telltale sign of generally who is contributing what, in an organization.

    helper800 said:
    One can easily get 10 or 20 patents via buying the rights to them or spending a few weeks with an engineer and a lawyer.
    AFAIK, no amount of money can get your name replaced as the inventor, once it's been filed. All you can do is get them re-assigned.

    It's like making a painting vs. buying one. Once filed, a patent is basically immutable.
    Reply