Kioxia shows off new 122.88 TB SSD — PCIe 5.0 LC9 packs a whole lot of QLC NAND
61 TB and 30 TB models are also available.

Nvidia's GTC conference has focused heavily — almost exclusively — on AI this year. Everything shown seems to have an AI connection. And one thing we know about AI is that it needs a lot of memory, and a lot of storage to hold the increasingly large models. That's where Kioxia's new LC9 data center drive comes into play.
The LC9 uses Kioxia's BiCS 8 QLC NAND with 2 Tb dies. It's unclear how many dies are in a package, probably 16, yielding 4TB capacity packages. Even with that much density, you would still need 32 such packages to reach the 122.88 TB of capacity offered by the top LC9 model (leaving a decent amount of spare flash to help with performance and endurance).
What's new with the LC9 is that it's also a PCIe 5.0 compliant drive, and it's dual-port as well. That means it can function as a single x4 device, or it can alternatively run with two x2 links. Kioxia showed the drive running a sustained read test and pushing close to the interface's maximum 15 GB/s (give or take).
The drive isn't rated for massive amounts of data writes, with only a 0.3 DWPD (drive writes per day) endurance. That's still plenty, as it means with a 5 year warranty the drive can handle around 67,000 TBW, which is more than enough for read-intensive applications. In contrast, some data center drives are designed to accommodate multiple DWPD, especially those intended for write-heavy workloads, so the write endurance rating tells us the target usage for this drive.
The LC9 instead focuses on providing high read speeds for a lot of data. That's useful for AI models that continue to grow in size. With its voracious appetite for both memory and storage — and a lot of companies were talking about ways to offload portions of the AI stack to fast SSD storage — it feels like it's only a matter of time before someone creates a single LLM that will require the entire capacity of Kioxia's LC9 122.88 TB drive.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
JarredWaltonGPU
Yes, but only if you fill all four bays. (I don't think it supports the necessary U.2 connectors?)heffeque said:Will this work on my DS918+ NAS?
(Just in case I'll clarify that I'm just kidding).
Fun story: So at the booth, while photographing the LC9 123TB drive... it got bumped and fell to the floor. One of the Kioxia guys quips, "No worries, it only costs as much as a modest car..." LOL
I wouldn't be surprised if the sample drive that was sitting out is actually dead/defective just because stuff like that can happen. Like how AMD gave out Threadripper and Vega "trophies" using dead CPUs and GPUs back in the day.
I also tried to get them to let me open up the drive so I could photograph the internals. Mostly I wanted to see what they looked like. They wouldn't let me, probably would have gotten someone fired... -
Math Geek can't possibly cost that much. i see 128 tb thumb drives on amazon, wish, and other sites for only like $20. $40 maybe if it has a cool name with "ultra mega killer super gamer" in it.Reply -
ChocoboGuy
Assuming linear pricing (which is not how it actually works, but is good enough for a rough estimate).JarredWaltonGPU said:Yes, but only if you fill all four bays. (I don't think it supports the necessary U.2 connectors?)
Fun story: So at the booth, while photographing the LC9 123TB drive... it got bumped and fell to the floor. One of the Kioxia guys quips, "No worries, it only costs as much as a modest car..." LOL
I wouldn't be surprised if the sample drive that was sitting out is actually dead/defective just because stuff like that can happen. Like how AMD gave out Threadripper and Vega "trophies" using dead CPUs and GPUs back in the day.
I also tried to get them to let me open up the drive so I could photograph the internals. Mostly I wanted to see what they looked like. They wouldn't let me, probably would have gotten someone fired...
A 15.36 TB drive on CDW is currently $3k, LinkSo a 122 TB drive would be at least $24k. Personally I'd guess closer to the $30k-$40k range. -
thestryker Solidigm 61.44TB PCIe 4.0 drives are down to around $6k USD now so I imagine these are going to be around $15-18k (unless they're able to really fleece the market as retail availability on high capacity PCIe 5.0 is basically zero).Reply
I keep hoping this thirst for enterprise NAND storage will mean the ~8-32TB used market can thrive. While I couldn't justify the cost required to replace the HDDs in my server box I'd love to get 1-2 high capacity PCIe SSDs. -
USAFRet
:ptdr: :ptdr: :ptdr: :ptdr: :ptdr:Math Geek said:can't possibly cost that much. i see 128 tb thumb drives on amazon, wish, and other sites for only like $20. $40 maybe if it has a cool name with "ultra mega killer super gamer" in it. -
Rookie_MIB
Agreed. I'd love to see the 16TB market come way down. If they could come down into the $500 range for 16tb (about double the spinning rust cost) I could justify 4 of them for a nice 48TB raidz1 set.thestryker said:Solidigm 61.44TB PCIe 4.0 drives are down to around $6k USD now so I imagine these are going to be around $15-18k (unless they're able to really fleece the market as retail availability on high capacity PCIe 5.0 is basically zero).
I keep hoping this thirst for enterprise NAND storage will mean the ~8-32TB used market can thrive. While I couldn't justify the cost required to replace the HDDs in my server box I'd love to get 1-2 high capacity PCIe SSDs. -
Greg7579 Jared, I love your articles and reviews and lap them all up in order to keep my product and tech knowledge up to speed in a layman's sense. As I have told you before, I hate RAID or the thought of using any stack or array, and I am a photographer that has about 6.5 TB of data (raw image files). I built my PC with an 8TB M.2 PCIe4 main data drive and all of my data is on that drive. I back up to three internal 8TB Samsung SATA SSDs that are pretty cheap now. I also back up to one external 8TB M.2 PCIe 4 SSD in an external housing that I bought after one of your reviews. So I have my data all on one drive and synced with GoodSync to 4 other 8TB SSDs. The problem is, within 18 months I am going to need those 8TB drives to be 12TB. I ask you again (as I did a year ago), how long before I can buy a single M.2 PCIe 4 SSD that is bigger than 8TB? 10 or 12 TB would get me another 5 years. Otherwise, I am going to have to do what I don't want to do, and not have all the data on one sigle fast M.2 SSD drive backed up to other single large and fast stand-alone SSDs.Reply -
HideOut
Congratulations. You are compairing wh at is likely a fake chinese thumb drive, on the USB 2.0 standard to one of the highest end SSD's in the world. Your compairing a Yugo to a Bolide.Math Geek said:can't possibly cost that much. i see 128 tb thumb drives on amazon, wish, and other sites for only like $20. $40 maybe if it has a cool name with "ultra mega killer super gamer" in it. -
TechSpectrum
Uhm. I am pretty sure they were just being sarcastic/joking. 👀HideOut said:Congratulations. You are compairing wh at is likely a fake chinese thumb drive, on the USB 2.0 standard to one of the highest end SSD's in the world. Your compairing a Yugo to a Bolide.