ASMedia and Via Labs are developing USB4 v2 controllers, still 18 months away from launch

A USB 4 cable infront of a blug and white USB 4.0 logo
(Image credit: Getty / Formatoriginal / 5oopx)

With its 80 Gb/s transfer rate and a 120 Gb/s boost mode for high-performance displays, USB4 version 2 represents a major breakthrough in terms of connectivity. Unfortunately, for now, there are only two USB4 v2 controllers for PCs on the market: one from Apple, another from Intel (the JHL9580), so there is almost no way to add USB4 v2 to AMD platforms. Good news: this is going to change, as both ASMedia and Via Labs have revealed to Tom's Hardware that they are working on controllers set to launch in the next two years.

At Computex, we met with representatives from ASMedia and Via Labs, two well-known makers of external controllers for various connectivity standards. In fact, ASMedia develops chipsets for AMD. Both companies are working on USB 4 v2 controllers, yet ASMedia plans to release its chip towards the end of 2026, while Via Labs intends to launch its USB 4 v2 solution sometime in 2027. For now, it is not clear whether ASMedia and Via Labs are also developing USB4 v2 PHY in-house or plan to use an off-the-shelf offering from, say, Synopsys.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • -Fran-
    So... USB4.1? xD

    COME ON, WHY IS THAT SO HARD?!

    Regards.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    With the amount of development time left I wonder if this means they're designing it as a PCIe 5.0 controller like what they did with their USB 4 controller being PCIe 4.0.
    Reply
  • Jame5
    No, USB 5.

    That's what they should do. Double the bandwidth? New major version. Don't screw with people having to guess if it's new or not. Just USB 5. You know it's 2x as fast as USB 4. Done.

    Following @thestryker 's point: It would be like calling PCIe5.0 "PCIe4.0 v2" when they doubled the bandwidth.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Not that anyone will see this, but thanks to Anton for the informative article. I haven't tracked these developments very carefully, so I especially appreciate details like the differences between 4v1 and 4v2, as well as vs. TB5.
    Reply
  • astarbird
    Something else must have happened because on 10-16-25 the ROG XBOX ALLY X is releasing with USB4 V2.a/cHF8XRp
    Reply
  • FL Guy
    Agree, thanks Anton for a realistic update on the timeframe for rollout for USB4 V2 support chips.

    I also feel that no one on the development side of peripherals for AMD based systems is or was listening to user comments & needs on this point.

    Fwiw, as an enthusiast creative user who would definitely have brought new AMD based laptop AND desktop systems that included support for USB4 V2 and/or TB5 if it was available, I find this timeline for development of support on the AMD system side deeply frustrating & disappointing.

    Please don't tell me there is no application for it - I don't agree with this at all - I would have bought systems that included this a year ago, and be using it today if it was available.

    The timeline for support of USB4 V2 and/or TB5 on AMD systems looks like approx 3-5 years behind availability of TB5 on Intel & apple systems. As a former system engineer/mgr/ and tech roadmap contributor at HW & systems development companies, I see no technical reason why this support should be more than 12-18 months behind TB5 at most, and could easily have been much closer aligned.

    I view support for these options for high bandwidth connectivity as an important feature for creators (apparently Apple agrees).

    Apparently however this was simply a priority on the AMD system & support I/O component side, which is disappointing, and seems like a missed opportunity needlessly driving some users to Intel or Apple, or perhaps a needless HW churn for AMD system users when higher bandwidth I/O actually becomes available for AMD systems. It's beginning to look like maybe that was the point.

    At this point, it is what it is though.
    Reply