Nine Ingredients Essential To The Modern PC Experience

70

What Is The Modern PC Experience?

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Don Woligroski was a former senior hardware editor for Tom's Hardware. He has covered a wide range of PC hardware topics, including CPUs, GPUs, system building, and emerging technologies.

  • esrever
    What about a modern OS?
    Reply
  • Onus
    If the mouse belongs there, the QWERTY keyboard certainly does too.
    Reply
  • demonhorde665
    I though the article was about fundemental components of pc's not want's. MP3's is NOT fundemental to modern pc experience. in fact most people i know don't bother with mp3 on a pc , and rely on mp3 players or cell/phone players. also like esrever said , what about modern OS's , namely windows , with out windows its plausible that PC would never have caught on as a main stream part of life.
    Reply
  • ta152h
    he AT released in 1984 was the 139, and ran at 6 MHz, not 8 MHz. The 339 came out later, and ran at 8 MHz.

    The next release after that was Microchannel, not PCI, and came out in 1987. The most popular computers in the world used it; it wasn't a fringe technology. It ran, originally, at 10 MHz with 32-bit bus, and allowed for bus masters, and pretty much everything a modern bus would.
    Reply
  • sanilmahambre
    Eyfinity is modern pc's first impression
    Reply
  • skyline4727
    I'm surprised they didn't include CD or other removable media like floppy disks. How did you get programs on a computer without those.
    Reply
  • mayankleoboy1
    "mouse driven desktop paradigm"

    Fuck windows 8, right ?
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    About LCDs... "even with a 60 Hz refresh, they're easier to look at for long periods."

    The reason LCDs are easier to look at has nothing to do with refresh rate, it has to do with how CRTs have to use phosphors that fade fast enough to clear the screen between refreshes since there is no other way of clearing it while LCD pixels are continuously lit by the backlight, the active matrix can hold an image for over a second between refreshes without significant fading and can be adjusted at will either way (brighter/darker), no need to wait for fading unlike CRTs where the electron gun can only make pixels brighter.

    Active matrix LCDs can technically operate at close to 0Hz refresh and mobile LCD manufacturers have recently announced new LCDs supporting partial screen updates to avoid wasting power refreshing static parts of the screen all the time.

    Refresh may become an issue again with OLED which behaves a lot more like phosphor: needs a refresh rate high enough to avoid noticeable fading. Unlike phosphors though, OLED pixels can actually be turned off on demand, so longer fade times are not as much of an issue beyond using more power to turn pixels on/off.
    Reply
  • memadmax
    Apple will never get #2, and so be it's undoing....
    Reply
  • ojas
    The arrival of Windows 8 presents us with the first major departure from the input scheme created for the Alto four decades ago.
    And it's half-assed, not to mention that it's not even designed with PCs in mind.
    Reply