Aorus GTX 1080 Ti Xtreme Edition 11G Review
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Clock Rates, Heat & Noise
Clock Rates
Manufacturers can claim whatever they want in their marketing material. Actually achievable clock rates are subject to a number of hard-to-control variables, though. GPU quality, for instance, plays a big role, and there's no way to pre-screen what you get on that front. So, it's absolutely possible that a nominally slower card made by one board partner ends up faster than a more aggressively-tuned model from another partner. As a result, comparisons between products have to be approached with an understanding of some inherent uncertainty.
Board vendors can, however, control the settings and environmental factors that affect how GPU Boost ultimately determines operating frequency, depending on the situations it encounters. Beyond specifications like the power target or clock offset, temperature under load is perhaps the most influential factor in defining sustainable performance.
For the Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Xtreme Edition 11G, we measured an initial GPU Boost frequency as high as 2012 MHz during our gaming loop. As the card warmed up, it maintained an average of ~1873 MHz during our 30-minute measurement.
With a slightly higher power target and more aggressive cooling settings, it's probable that 1.9+ GHz could be sustained inside of a closed case.
Overclocking
Of course, the card does tolerate some additional overclocking. In our case, we achieved a stable 2067 MHz under air cooling, though we did have to significantly adjust Gigabyte's fan curve to bring temperatures down. This results in extra noise you might not want.
If you plan to overclock, consider increasing the power target to at least 350W (by moving the slider from ~135 to 150 percent).
The table below contains results after configuring our card in Afterburner and a long test run in The Witcher 3. We achieved the values in the last row without bumping voltage up any further. However, we did have to manually increase clock rate by 50 MHz to get there.
Clock Rate Increase | Power Target (Afterburner) | Voltage (Afterburner) | Avg. Boost Clock | Avg. Voltage | Power Consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | 100% | Standard | 1873 MHz | <0.9V | 251.9W |
No | 100% | Maximum | 1873 MHz | <0.9V | 252.4W |
No | 150% | Standard | 2012 MHz | <1.043V | 322.8W |
No | 150% | Maximum | 2037 MHz | <1.093V | 346.2W |
+50 MHz | 150% | Standard | 2067 MHz | <1.093V | 342.9W |
As long as your temperatures stay under 149°F (65°C) during gaming workloads, 2067 MHz is feasible and can almost be permanently maintained aside from the occasional dip. The right water-cooling setup allows even higher clock rates. But we already mentioned that we won the GPU lottery this time around.
Getting a good overclock from your memory requires perseverance and a bit of luck. Seemingly stable settings might work short-term, and then prove dicey after a few hours of gaming. In the case of our sample, an extra 300 to 400 MT/s was feasible. Beyond that, performance started sliding the other direction.
Heat
Because the backplate plays an active role in cooling, it has to stay on for our measurements. We did lay a bit of harrowing groundwork, though. Before taking our readings, we removed the backplate and identified the card's hot-spots. This gave us the information we needed to drill holes into the plate, directly above those areas. These holes allow us to take precise measurements, even with the plate attached.
During gaming, the GPU remains below 71°C on an open bench table. That's not bad for a flagship graphics card. The rest of the board remains pleasantly cool as well.
In a closed case, the GPU's temperature rises to somewhere between 74 and 75°C, corresponding to the temperature target set by Gigabyte. At that point, the fans need to perform at their highest setting. The memory and VRM continue getting hotter, but the readings we observe are still fairly moderate.
The situation intensifies during our stress test. Here, the memory modules see an even higher thermal load than the GPU. Nevertheless, we don't flag any problems on an open test bench.
A closed case can't push the temperatures we measure into a critical range. The GPU stays right where Gigabyte wants it, and the other components remain in good shape. This certainly leaves some headroom for manual overclocking.
Noise
The Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Xtreme Edition 11G is extremely quiet on our open test bench, since its fans spin at low RPM. It's only when we drop the card into a closed case that the fans speed up, particularly as its GPU approaches 74°C. But even then, the fans operate at just under 1900 RPM.
We record similar rotational speeds during our stress test, with the same consequences.
Using our special temperature-controlled anechoic chamber, we took a maximum reading of 37.6 dB(A), which really isn't bad for a flagship 300W card.
This value can be a little deceptive, though. We initially suspected that those peaks in the 6 kHz range were attributable to the voltage regulators. But the noise was still audible at idle, as long as the middle fan was spinning. It stopped as soon as we stuck a finger in there. Other models don't have this flaw, so we borrowed the fans off of an older Xtreme Gaming card to confirm that fixes the problem.
If you don't push the power target beyond reason, this card's cooler does its job competently and unobtrusively. Even in a closed case, all of the on-board components remain cool enough to facilitate a bit of manual overclocking.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Windows 11 Mixed Reality support revived for Meta Quest 3, Quest 3S headsets
Kickstarter campaign claims its $39 AI-powered PlayStation 5 add-on reduces exhaust temps by up to 9 degrees C
Nvidia, AMD, and Intel all invest in light-based communication networks powering next-gen chips — Ayar Labs gets $155 million in funding
-
drwho1 I wait till this cards drop under $300...Reply
Although by then I might want "that other new one" .... -
Bloody Chainsaw Correction. In the specs chart, the Titan's memory bus is listed as 38-bit. Should be 384.Reply -
Kevin-M At that absurd price point you would think there would be more generosity than the inclusion of one of the most common elements on the planet! Thanks but no thanks, I will remain a smart shopper and wait until the price point comes down to a realistic one!Reply -
FormatC Expensive is relative. Mostly all non-smokers have money enough. It is the question, which priority you set. :)Reply -
FormatC If I get one as sample, yes. But closed loop isn't a solution. This are more or less toys.Reply -
TMRichard I must say I think I got a Golden Sample then, my card stays at a stable 2012MHz GPU clock under 65C with fans @ 75% Just waiting on EK to get their block ready so I can add it to my loop!Reply -
FormatC As I wrote in my review - it is a pure lotto. The test sample is running with GPU- und VRM-Waterblock with the AB Extreme and 1.093 Volts at 20°C (chiller) stable 2166 MHz. Other cards neets 1.2 Volts (I have a NO2 BIOS from another card) to crack the 2100 MHz barrier stable. If you buy a card, you get no warranty which GPU quality you get.Reply