HP Dragonfly G4 Review: Minor Additions and Adjustments

Intel’s 13th Gen comes to HP’s pleasing premium portable.

HP Dragonfly G4
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

HP’s updated Dragonfly G4 retains its excellent design while adding some business-focused camera tricks. It’s still a great premium clamshell if you prioritize quiet fans over absolute performance. But battery life and tested performance weren’t quite the best.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Excellent design and ports

  • +

    Bright Screen

  • +

    Extremely quiet

  • +

    Great speakers

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Battery life, while good, lags behind previous model

  • -

    Security software is too aggressive

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

HP’s Elite Dragonfly G3 is already one of the best ultrabooks available, so the company has seemingly taken a “don’t fix what isn’t broken” approach with its latest Dragonfly G4 model. Although for some reason, HP saw fit to remove the “Elite” bit from the laptop’s name.

The Dragonfly G4 steps up to Intel’s 13th Gen processors and adds some neat new business-focused camera and software tricks. Otherwise, the design and hardware are functionally the same as the G3. That’s far from a bad thing, as the Dragonfly is one of the nicest ultraportables available. But our testing showed its performance often lagging behind the competition (though it likely trades some speed for extremely quiet fans). And battery life, while still quite good, couldn’t match the 14 hours we saw on the previous-gen G3 model.

Design of the HP Dragonfly G4

Matt Safford
Managing Editor

After a rough start with the Mattel Aquarius as a child, Matt built his first PC in the late 1990s and ventured into mild PC modding in the early 2000s. He’s spent the last 15 years covering emerging technology for Smithsonian, Popular Science, and Consumer Reports, while testing components and PCs for Computer Shopper, PCMag and Digital Trends.

  • cknobman
    What runs through my head when thinking about laptops like this is while they are good why pay $2k for it when you can get a Macbook Air for soooo much less?

    Dont get me wrong I am no Apple fanboy, heck I dont even own a Apple laptop.

    But the Macbook Air 13 or 15 will perform similar, if not better, be silent, blow away Intel based laptops in battery life, and have better build quality and support than what HP offers.

    I've always been a Windows laptop kind of guy but with more and more workloads moving to the cloud the Operating system is becoming less and less important.
    Reply
  • ikjadoon
    Frustrating to see battery life stay stagnant or get worse. These manufacturers don't know what to do with a CPU or seemingly platform power management. They just throw in whatever parts with a "screw it, ship it now!" mentality.

    Throttle the power limits, FFS.

    How did HP lose 12% battery life YoY? Does Tom's Hardware have any information? Assuming Tom's Hardware & Tom's Guide run the same test suite:

    HP Dragonfly G3 (68 WHr): 14.33hr / 4.75W
    HP Dragonfly G4 (68 WHr): 12.73hr / 5.35W
    MacBook Air 13 M1 (50 WHr): 14.68hr / 3.41W
    MacBook Air 13 M2 (53 WHr): 14.1hr / 3.55W

    Wrong direction, HP. Even these ultra-premium, ultra-low-power Intel laptops can't get their battery life together.
    Reply