Load Regulation, Hold-Up Time And Inrush Current
To learn more about our PSU tests and methodology, please check out How We Test Power Supply Units.
Primary Rails And 5VSB Load Regulation
Load Regulation testing is detailed here.
Our hold-up time tests are described in detail here.
Measured hold-up time is among the lowest we have ever seen. And to make matters worse, the power-good signal drops while the rails are already out of spec. This is unacceptable, especially for a PSU that costs $120. Enhance needs to increase the bulk capacitor's to enable a decent hold-up time.
For details on our inrush current testing, please click here.
The lack of a bypass relay, which allows the NTC thermistor to cool down quickly, and a lackluster thermistor choice inevitably lead to high inrush currents.
Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements
Our first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the PSU's efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the STP-0600F-G's maximum load in increments of 10 percentage points.
We conducted two additional tests. During the first, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load, while the load at +12V was only 0.1 A. This test reveals whether a PSU is Haswell-ready or not. In the second test, we determined the maximum load the +12V rail could handle with minimal load on the minor rails.
|Test #||12V||5V||3.3V||5VSB||DC/AC (Watts)||Efficiency||Fan Speed||Fan Noise||Temps (In/Out)||PF/AC Volts|
|1||3.160A||1.995A||1.984A||0.991A||59.74||80.63%||2245 RPM||34.9 dB(A)||39.34 °C||0.963|
|2||7.366A||3.000A||2.988A||1.195A||119.75||88.04%||2300 RPM||36.5 dB(A)||40.03 °C||0.976|
|3||11.937A||3.510A||3.513A||1.400A||179.84||89.35%||2360 RPM||37.2 dB(A)||40.58 °C||0.970|
|4||16.519A||4.022A||4.009A||1.604A||239.78||89.78%||2470 RPM||38.3 dB(A)||41.25 °C||0.981|
|5||20.768A||5.032A||5.030A||1.810A||299.71||89.76%||2660 RPM||40.8 dB(A)||41.56 °C||0.988|
|6||25.037A||6.059A||6.057A||2.017A||359.72||89.53%||2790 RPM||42.4 dB(A)||42.54 °C||0.991|
|7||29.319A||7.085A||7.095A||2.225A||419.59||89.11%||2820 RPM||43.1 dB(A)||42.81 °C||0.993|
|8||33.616A||8.124A||8.141A||2.436A||479.64||88.57%||2950 RPM||46.9 dB(A)||43.77 °C||0.994|
|9||38.368A||8.652A||8.692A||2.442A||539.71||87.99%||3025 RPM||48.4 dB(A)||45.42 °C||0.995|
|10||43.083A||9.177A||9.220A||2.550A||599.52||87.31%||3025 RPM||48.4 dB(A)||46.01 °C||0.996|
|11||48.219A||9.199A||9.248A||2.554A||659.41||84.53%||3025 RPM||48.4 dB(A)||46.45 °C||0.996|
|CL1||0.100A||11.016A||11.004A||0.000A||92.29||84.11%||3025 RPM||48.4 dB(A)||44.38 °C||0.988|
|CL2||49.948A||1.003A||1.003A||1.001A||606.84||87.99%||3025 RPM||48.4 dB(A)||44.61 °C||0.996|
Load regulation is mediocre on all rails; the STP-0600F-G doesn't stand a chance compared to the numbers that Corsair's SF600 achieves. The higher ambient temperature inside of our hot-box doesn't allow Thermaltake's passive mode to engage, and the fan profile is aggressive when it gets this hot. Thankfully, the small fan isn't particularly loud compared to other 80 mm fans, so up to the 40% load test, we record lower than 40 dB(A) results. As for efficiency, the PSU satisfies the 80 PLUS Gold requirements under 20% and 100% loads, and comes close to the corresponding threshold under mid-load. Given very high operating temperatures, we can easily give it a pass.
Take a closer look at the table above and you'll see efficiency drop dramatically under 110% load. Clearly, the STP-0600F-G is hugely stressed by 660 W of load. Aside from low efficiency, it also makes a high-pitched noise and ripple on its rails is way above the limits. Thermaltake claims a 720 W peak load, though that doesn't look to be 100% true. You may be able to apply such a load level, but expect terrible ripple suppression and very low efficiency. So, whether you want to overload it for short periods is your choice. We have to warn you, though, that you'd also be applying huge stress to your other hardware, since high ripple shortens the life of components like electrolytic caps. It also significantly affects the performance of voltage regulation circuits, jeopardizing stability.
This thing sucks.
This unit is a 450W power supply IMO. Basically, Thermaltake probably took their 450W power supply, slapped 600W on it, kept the same amount of PCIe cables, and called it a 600W power supply. This power supply is stupid, I don't know who would buy it. That's just my opinion of course, but safety should be the most important thing of a power supply, and even thought it didn't blow up, if it had 510mv of ripple at 110% load, imagine what it had at 140% load before it shut off? Probably 2000mv of ripple. There goes the GPU. There goes the CPU. There goes everything!
But Thermaltake knows that not a single person who purchases this thing will have done their PSU research, and therefore not a single person buying this thing will probably have a system that demands more than 250-300W. Thermaltake preys on the vulnerabilities of the uneducated, it's a disgrace, it's disgusting.
You wouldn't need a 600W power supply with an SFF build period. It razzes my berries that the mere fruit of the existence of this thing is an example of an unethically engineered product that nobody needs but is designed for those who don't know what they don't need.
Not until the Corsair SF Series was released while I was sitting behind a desk at Corsair did I realize just how many people use SFX power supplies in full size cases. Absolutely AMAZES me. So.. yeah...
The PSU is one of the most important parts of the PC (Id say its THE most important), so a good review of a PSU is always welcome.
Well done toms.
Yeah but this is not what I'd call competition... Nobody needs to compete against Thermaltake's product since it stinks.