Thermaltake Toughpower SFX 600W PSU Review

Load Regulation, Hold-Up Time And Inrush Current

To learn more about our PSU tests and methodology, please check out How We Test Power Supply Units. 

Loading...

Primary Rails And 5VSB Load Regulation

Load Regulation testing is detailed here.

Hold-Up Time

Our hold-up time tests are described in detail here.

Measured hold-up time is among the lowest we have ever seen. And to make matters worse, the power-good signal drops while the rails are already out of spec. This is unacceptable, especially for a PSU that costs $120. Enhance needs to increase the bulk capacitor's to enable a decent hold-up time.

Inrush Current

For details on our inrush current testing, please click here.

The lack of a bypass relay, which allows the NTC thermistor to cool down quickly, and a lackluster thermistor choice inevitably lead to high inrush currents.

Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements

Our first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the PSU's efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the STP-0600F-G's maximum load in increments of 10 percentage points.

We conducted two additional tests. During the first, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load, while the load at +12V was only 0.1 A. This test reveals whether a PSU is Haswell-ready or not. In the second test, we determined the maximum load the +12V rail could handle with minimal load on the minor rails. 

Test #12V5V3.3V5VSBDC/AC (Watts)EfficiencyFan Speed
Fan Noise
Temps (In/Out)PF/AC Volts
13.160A1.995A1.984A0.991A59.7480.63%2245 RPM
34.9 dB(A)
39.34 °C0.963
12.080V5.010V3.323V5.026V74.0944.06 °C115.1V
27.366A3.000A2.988A1.195A119.7588.04%2300 RPM36.5 dB(A)40.03 °C0.976
12.065V4.998V3.312V5.009V136.0245.04 °C115.1V
311.937A3.510A3.513A1.400A179.8489.35%2360 RPM37.2 dB(A)40.58 °C0.970
12.043V4.986V3.299V4.995V201.2746.12 °C115.1V
416.519A4.022A4.009A1.604A239.7889.78%2470 RPM38.3 dB(A)41.25 °C0.981
12.022V4.975V3.291V4.981V267.0847.88 °C115.2V
520.768A5.032A5.030A1.810A299.7189.76%2660 RPM40.8 dB(A)41.56 °C0.988
12.002V4.963V3.278V4.968V333.8949.48 °C115.2V
625.037A6.059A6.057A2.017A359.7289.53%2790 RPM42.4 dB(A)42.54 °C0.991
11.980V4.952V3.267V4.950V401.7750.77 °C115.2V
729.319A7.085A7.095A2.225A419.5989.11%2820 RPM43.1 dB(A)42.81 °C0.993
11.956V4.938V3.254V4.935V470.8751.21 °C115.1V
833.616A8.124A8.141A2.436A479.6488.57%2950 RPM46.9 dB(A)43.77 °C0.994
11.936V4.927V3.242V4.918V541.5453.29 °C115.1V
938.368A8.652A8.692A2.442A539.7187.99%3025 RPM48.4 dB(A)45.42 °C0.995
11.914V4.914V3.232V4.908V613.4057.15 °C115.2V
1043.083A9.177A9.220A2.550A599.5287.31%3025 RPM48.4 dB(A)46.01 °C0.996
11.892V4.904V3.220V4.894V686.6360.01 °C115.2V
1148.219A9.199A9.248A2.554A659.4184.53%3025 RPM48.4 dB(A)46.45 °C0.996
11.867V4.894V3.211V4.886V780.1161.12 °C115.2V
CL10.100A11.016A11.004A0.000A92.2984.11%3025 RPM48.4 dB(A)44.38 °C0.988
12.084V4.978V3.294V5.024V109.7255.30 °C115.2V
CL249.948A1.003A1.003A1.001A606.8487.99%3025 RPM48.4 dB(A)44.61 °C0.996
11.886V4.929V3.249V4.950V689.6757.69 °C115.2V

Load regulation is mediocre on all rails; the STP-0600F-G doesn't stand a chance compared to the numbers that Corsair's SF600 achieves. The higher ambient temperature inside of our hot-box doesn't allow Thermaltake's passive mode to engage, and the fan profile is aggressive when it gets this hot. Thankfully, the small fan isn't particularly loud compared to other 80 mm fans, so up to the 40% load test, we record lower than 40 dB(A) results. As for efficiency, the PSU satisfies the 80 PLUS Gold requirements under 20% and 100% loads, and comes close to the corresponding threshold under mid-load. Given very high operating temperatures, we can easily give it a pass.

Take a closer look at the table above and you'll see efficiency drop dramatically under 110% load. Clearly, the STP-0600F-G is hugely stressed by 660 W of load. Aside from low efficiency, it also makes a high-pitched noise and ripple on its rails is way above the limits. Thermaltake claims a 720 W peak load, though that doesn't look to be 100% true. You may be able to apply such a load level, but expect terrible ripple suppression and very low efficiency. So, whether you want to overload it for short periods is your choice. We have to warn you, though, that you'd also be applying huge stress to your other hardware, since high ripple shortens the life of components like electrolytic caps. It also significantly affects the performance of voltage regulation circuits, jeopardizing stability.

This thread is closed for comments
15 comments
    Your comment
  • Dark Lord of Tech
    Hard to compete with the SF Corsairs.
  • Pixdawg
    Based on this review, I wouldn't buy the thing for half its listed price. How the devil did it get a Gold rating, anyway?
  • Clamyboy74
    You would only need 2 pcie cables since these psu are designed for sff builds, with only 1 gpu since you also use a m-itx board.
  • turkey3_scratch
    This power supply is a disaster. It does not have working protection circuitry and should be a 450W unit, not a 600W unit.

    This thing sucks.

    This unit is a 450W power supply IMO. Basically, Thermaltake probably took their 450W power supply, slapped 600W on it, kept the same amount of PCIe cables, and called it a 600W power supply. This power supply is stupid, I don't know who would buy it. That's just my opinion of course, but safety should be the most important thing of a power supply, and even thought it didn't blow up, if it had 510mv of ripple at 110% load, imagine what it had at 140% load before it shut off? Probably 2000mv of ripple. There goes the GPU. There goes the CPU. There goes everything!

    But Thermaltake knows that not a single person who purchases this thing will have done their PSU research, and therefore not a single person buying this thing will probably have a system that demands more than 250-300W. Thermaltake preys on the vulnerabilities of the uneducated, it's a disgrace, it's disgusting.

    1795882 said:
    You would only need 2 pcie cables since these psu are designed for sff builds, with only 1 gpu since you also use a m-itx board.


    You wouldn't need a 600W power supply with an SFF build period. It razzes my berries that the mere fruit of the existence of this thing is an example of an unethically engineered product that nobody needs but is designed for those who don't know what they don't need.
  • jonnyguru
    1795882 said:
    You would only need 2 pcie cables since these psu are designed for sff builds, with only 1 gpu since you also use a m-itx board.


    Not until the Corsair SF Series was released while I was sitting behind a desk at Corsair did I realize just how many people use SFX power supplies in full size cases. Absolutely AMAZES me. So.. yeah...
  • turkey3_scratch
    Dont know if a 300mm 24-pin cable could reach the board in a full sized case.
  • cats_Paw
    As much as I give Tomshardware a lot of pain for many of their articles This one is a very solid test.
    The PSU is one of the most important parts of the PC (Id say its THE most important), so a good review of a PSU is always welcome.

    Well done toms.
  • Dark Lord of Tech
    I commend Thermaltake for releasing into the SFX market , more competition is good for the industry. With very little to choose from , it's still a huge plus to have more SFX units out there on the retail market.
  • turkey3_scratch
    276663 said:
    I commend Thermaltake for releasing into the SFX market , more competition is good for the industry. With very little to choose from , it's still a huge plus to have more SFX units out there on the retail market.


    Yeah but this is not what I'd call competition... Nobody needs to compete against Thermaltake's product since it stinks.
  • nem3s1s
    GOOD QUALITY as usual on Enhance but seems they need smart enginiers to up level to the designs. wireless etc
  • turkey3_scratch
    2328640 said:
    GOOD QUALITY as usual on Enhance but seems they need smart enginiers to up level to the designs. wireless etc


    Wireless? What are you talking about? This unit stinks in terms of quality.
  • nukemaster
    1685304 said:
    Based on this review, I wouldn't buy the thing for half its listed price. How the devil did it get a Gold rating, anyway?

    The Gold rating is efficiency only. It could be a screaming jet with extreme ripple and as long as it meets the efficiency at the key points, it can get Gold certified.

    Luck enough many SSF users would never run into the units flaws because many SFF systems are pretty power friendly(Even if the end user wants to have 600 watts and uses 350).

    Corsair is still winning the race hands down.
  • turkey3_scratch
    35532 said:
    1685304 said:
    Based on this review, I wouldn't buy the thing for half its listed price. How the devil did it get a Gold rating, anyway?
    The Gold rating is efficiency only. It could be a screaming jet with extreme ripple and as long as it meets the efficiency at the key points, it can get Gold certified. Luck enough many SSF users would never run into the units flaws because many SFF systems are pretty power friendly(Even if the end user wants to have 600 watts and uses 350). Corsair is still winning the race hands down.


    The biggest flaw lies in its non-working protections, and a short could cause current to increase, and since OCP is set way too high, ripple could amount to 1.5V and literally kill hardware IMO.
  • Mike Adams
    looks like a solid build with good capacitors but I don't trust Thermaltake products. their stuff has bad reviews all over the Internet. since they source all the components from China they might be counterfeit. For $120 I'd rather buy a reputable brand like Antec or Corsair
  • turkey3_scratch
    Who cares about capacitors when everything else sucks.