Apple rolls out its C1 modem six years after buying in the technology from Intel
Features in the new iPhone 16e mainstream handset.

UPDATE 2/27: Although Apple does not directly state that the iPhone 16e supports TDD networks, the bands that the company lists clearly indicate that it does. To that end, we introduce an appropriate fix for this story.
Apple on Wednesday formally introduced its first in-house developed 5G modem that will be used in the company's new $599 6.1-inch iPhone 16e smartphone, aimed at the mainstream audience. The modem is the first fruit from Apple's acquisition of Intel's 5G modem business unit six years ago.
Apple says its C1 is the "most power-efficient modem ever on iPhone" and delivers "fast and reliable 5G connectivity." Indeed, the modem supports most key 4G and 5G technologies, including sub-6 GHz 5G with 4x4 MIMO, Gigabit LTE with 4x4 MIMO, FDD-LTE, TD-LTE, as well as 3G and 2G capabilities for compatibility.
Yet, the company does not disclose how this energy efficiency was achieved. Apple could use its own custom Arm or RISC-V-based cores with optimized power consumption. Also, the company uses one of TSMC's 4nm-class process technology (presumably N4P) to make C1 chips (according to an interview with Reuters), which assists in reducing power consumption. Since Apple tends to tightly integrate its hardware (C1) and software (iOS 18), it can enable its own proprietary power states that allow it to cut power consumption without performance degradation.
For now, Apple's C1 is used exclusively inside the iPhone 16e, which is a mainstream handset that does not support a number of performance-enhancing yet power-hungry capabilities, such as Wi-Fi 7, mmWave 5G, and DC-HSDPA.
Millimeter Wave 5G can deliver very high data rates, but to achieve them, the phone has to pack phased-array antennas and rely heavily on beamforming. 5G handsets with mmWave support must constantly adjust beams and manage multiple antenna elements in real-time, which means greater signal processing, more frequent power amplifier usage, and higher power consumption.
The same applies to DC-HSDPA: the feature increases data rates by using two carrier frequencies instead of one, which inherently means that the device's radio components are working harder, leading to increased power consumption. However, this can all be optimized.
UPDATE 2/27: While the original story stated that the iPhone 16e did not support TDD networks, it indeed does and this is a valuable capability.
TDD networks use a single frequency channel for both uplink and downlink transmissions but at different time intervals, which adds flexibility and improves spectrum efficiency, making them beneficial in dense urban areas. However, TDD networks require strict timing synchronization between the phone and the base station, as well as switching between UL and DL, so the phone has to continuously adjust its transmission timing and radio circuits, which adds processing overhead and increases power consumption. Also, in weak signal areas, a phone has to increase its transmission power to maintain a connection, which is more taxing in TDD than in FDD.
At this point, we do not know whether Apple's C1 lacks support for certain power-hungry features altogether, or if it is the iPhone 16e that omits certain features to cut its costs and power consumption. For example, the smartphone does not feature Apple's ultra-wideband chip, Thread networking technology, or MagSafe charging (although it does support Qi wireless charging and lacks magnets for MagSafe), and even the Camera Control button — four features that are cheap and easy to implement.
On the bright side, Apple's iPhone 16e is based on a rather powerful A18 processor with six cores and a cut-down quad-cluster GPU that comes equipped with enough memory to run Apple Intelligence applications.
Apple tends to use its own silicon instead of third-party chips whenever possible, so expect the C1 and its successors to be used more widely over time. For now, the C1 enables Apple to cut its costs (as it does not need to pay a premium to Qualcomm) and perhaps use it as bargaining leverage when negotiating prices with Qualcomm. Nonetheless, over time, Apple plans to use its own modems across all of its devices.
"C1 is the start, and we're going to keep improving that technology each generation, so that it becomes a platform for us that will be used to truly differentiate this technology for our products," Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, told Reuters.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
HideOut I get 5G for phones. Its cool to say you have it. It uses more battery and NO ONE needs 500Mbit internet to scroll the web or watch 720p video on their screen. Its such a huge gimmick that is sold to people to convince them they jusut NEED something. MAYBE if you were uusing 5G in your home, boat or RV it makes sense because its replacing your FTTP connection, but even if you are tethering your laptop a few hundred MB/sec matches or beats most peoples h ome internet. Its just marketing garbage.Reply -
Mr Majestyk
I live in a rural area and my 5G performs far far worse than 4G. Battery life sucks, range sucks, signal sucks, and it's a premium to have 5G. I get a ton of drop outs, and download rates often like dial up.HideOut said:I get 5G for phones. Its cool to say you have it. It uses more battery and NO ONE needs 500Mbit internet to scroll the web or watch 720p video on their screen. Its such a huge gimmick that is sold to people to convince them they jusut NEED something. MAYBE if you were uusing 5G in your home, boat or RV it makes sense because its replacing your FTTP connection, but even if you are tethering your laptop a few hundred MB/sec matches or beats most peoples h ome internet. Its just marketing garbage. -
CelicaGT
I tether my phone to my laptop a lot when I'm on the road, so I definitely appreciate the speed. I'm travelling right now and I just downloaded 126.93 GB of FFXVI goodness faster than at home (Hotel WiFi is crap). But ya, as for on the phone by itself I typically cap it at 4G both for battery and signal strength reasons.HideOut said:I get 5G for phones. Its cool to say you have it. It uses more battery and NO ONE needs 500Mbit internet to scroll the web or watch 720p video on their screen. Its such a huge gimmick that is sold to people to convince them they jusut NEED something. MAYBE if you were uusing 5G in your home, boat or RV it makes sense because its replacing your FTTP connection, but even if you are tethering your laptop a few hundred MB/sec matches or beats most peoples h ome internet. Its just marketing garbage. -
TCA_ChinChin So Apple cut out all of the high-power features from their own modem in order to call it energy efficient? Sounds like a test for them to roll out the C2 or C3 for their main lineup next generation.Reply
Still props to them, navigating the landscape of wireless technology even with Intel's homework isn't that easy. -
ieatfishburritos Just to note, Apple purchased a modem team from Intel, Intel purchased a modem team from Fujitsu, whom purchased it from Motorola (Freescale). The original Motorola team had developed 4G LTE modems in the 00's. I'm sure many people have changed and such over the years.Reply