Dog-like robot jams home networks and disables devices during police raids — DHS develops NEO robot for walking denial of service attacks

Neo entering a room
(Image credit: Ghost Robotics / YouTube)

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that it has developed a four-legged robot designed to jam the wireless transmissions of smart home devices. The robot was revealed at the 2024 Border Security Expo and is called NEO. It is built using the Quadruped Unmanned Ground Vehicle (Q-UGV) and looks a lot like the Boston Dynamics Spot robot. 

According to the transcript of the speech by DHS Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) director Benjamine Huffman, acquired by 404 Media, NEO is equipped with an antenna array that is designed to overload home networks, thus disrupting devices that rely on Wi-Fi and other wireless communication protocols. It will thus likely be effective against a wide range of popular smart home devices that use wireless technologies for communications.

Aside from taking out smart devices, law enforcement can also use the robot to communicate with subjects in the target area, and to provide remote eyes and ears to officers on the ground. “NEO can enter a potentially dangerous environment to provide video and audio feedback to the officers before entry and allow them to communicate with those in that environment,” says Huffman. “NEO carries an onboard computer and antenna array that will allow officers the ability to create a ‘denial-of-service’ (DoS) event to disable ‘Internet of Things’ devices that could potentially cause harm while entry is made.”

Ghost Robotics Partners with Rajant to Develop Resilient Public Safety Mesh Networks - YouTube Ghost Robotics Partners with Rajant to Develop Resilient Public Safety Mesh Networks - YouTube
Watch On

This roaming robotic jammer was first contemplated after a child sexual abuse suspect used his doorbell camera to see FBI agents at his door serving a search warrant. The gunman opened fire on them from behind the closed door with an assault-style rifle, killing two veteran agents and injuring three more.

Aside from the NEO, the DHS also built the ‘FLETC Smart House’, which is designed to train law enforcement about smart home devices and how they could be used against them. Huffman explained, “A suspect who has been searched and is under the control of officers can cause these actions to happen with a simple voice command which can start a chain of events to occur within a house, such as turning off lights, locking doors, activating the HVAC system to introduce chemicals into the environment and cause a fire or explosion to take place.”

This development shows how law enforcement is catching up with technological advancements. Smart home devices started becoming common in the mid-to-late-2010s, with many users installing them to automate several aspects of their houses and bolster security. So, anyone with a little bit of technical know-how and ingenuity could potentially create a hostile environment using readily available wireless electronics. While NEO might not be able to affect hard-wired smart devices, it would still be able to disable the radio frequencies most wireless IoT devices use, thus reducing the risks for law enforcement officers.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • scottsoapbox
    This is utterly ridiculous: "with a simple voice command... activating the HVAC system to introduce chemicals into the environment and cause a fire or explosion to take place"
    A) No smart home device is reliable enough to trust this not going off randomly.
    B) Dangerous chemicals in the HVAC disables the use of said HVAC for heat and AC during normal living.

    The most commonly used WiFi smart home devices are cameras. The FBI doesn't want cloud-secured video of their actions on raids. Period. These Rube Goldberg examples are an excuse. (How they put it: if you aren't doing anything illegal, why would you mind surveillance?)
    Reply
  • das_stig
    lets hope they have the sense to get jamming on the search warrant as this is probably unlawful somewhere, state sponsored jamming/DDOS as I doubt it will be effective unless its on a wide area and disrupting innocent neighbours will be on dodgy ground in U.S law?
    Reply
  • Eximo
    das_stig said:
    lets hope they have the sense to get jamming on the search warrant as this is probably unlawful somewhere, state sponsored jamming/DDOS as I doubt it will be effective unless its on a wide area and disrupting innocent neighbours will be on dodgy ground in U.S law?
    Unlawful everywhere I would think. Super curious if they even bothered to check.

    Can you imagine what would happen if your next door neighbor was getting raided and you had one of those realtime medical monitoring devices. Or if it interfered with pacemakers or something.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    Yeah this feels all sorts of police state wrong. Hopefully someone challenges this in court
    Reply
  • wbfox
    And while the cooperative, definitely evil bad guy, waits to be hauled away, at the last moment before he is led from the building, he says the magic words, "no witnesses," and , oh, is that darn robo-dog interfering with all the wifi security cameras...and our body cams? What an interesting code word you chose Mr. Bad Guy!
    Reply
  • wbfox
    Eximo said:
    Unlawful everywhere I would think. Super curious if they even bothered to check.

    Can you imagine what would happen if your next door neighbor was getting raided and you had one of those realtime medical monitoring devices. Or if it interfered with pacemakers or something.
    Because something being illegal has always been such an obstacle for those in law enforcement.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    wbfox said:
    Because something being illegal has always been such an obstacle for those in law enforcement.
    I agree with the sentiment.

    Just curious if they have vetted this with anyone from a legal perspective. I get why they want something like this, but its use seems rather limited.

    Warrant would be nice, but that raises the question of how broad such a warrant would need to be. What rights the non-suspects have in the general area, etc. Police action is allowed to be an inconvenience at times, but if that jammer causes permanent property damage then the police would likely claim immunity. Such a thing would have to be litigated out.
    Reply
  • 8086
    Dumb homes with wired networking are the solution and have your own suite of jammers on hand to jam such a threat to liberty. And thank God smart guns aren't a thing, because the police/FBI/DHS can just jam those too.
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    scottsoapbox said:
    This is utterly ridiculous: "with a simple voice command... activating the HVAC system to introduce chemicals into the environment and cause a fire or explosion to take place"
    A) No smart home device is reliable enough to trust this not going off randomly.
    B) Dangerous chemicals in the HVAC disables the use of said HVAC for heat and AC during normal living.

    The most commonly used WiFi smart home devices are cameras. The FBI doesn't want cloud-secured video of their actions on raids. Period. These Rube Goldberg examples are an excuse. (How they put it: if you aren't doing anything illegal, why would you mind surveillance?)
    Yeah this is about blocking home recording of raids. All that other crap is just FUD justifications. I know it kinda sucks but wired is the only real option now.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    scottsoapbox said:
    This is utterly ridiculous: "with a simple voice command... activating the HVAC system to introduce chemicals into the environment and cause a fire or explosion to take place"
    A) No smart home device is reliable enough to trust this not going off randomly.
    B) Dangerous chemicals in the HVAC disables the use of said HVAC for heat and AC during normal living.

    The most commonly used WiFi smart home devices are cameras. The FBI doesn't want cloud-secured video of their actions on raids. Period. These Rube Goldberg examples are an excuse. (How they put it: if you aren't doing anything illegal, why would you mind surveillance?)
    Please enter the alert phrase for the butenethiol HVAC release mechanism.
    "Joe Biden assisted MIT with particle physics research"
    Alert Phrase accepted
    System on standby
    Reply