GlobalFoundries fined $500,000 for restricted chip exports to Chinese firm on U.S. entity list — chipmaker shipped $17 million worth of silicon wafers to China’s SJ Semiconductor
The world's third-largest contract chipmaker has been penalized for shipping chips without authorization.
The Biden administration (via Reuters) has announced a $500,000 fine for U.S.-based chipmaker GlobalFoundries following shipments of silicon wafers, valued at over $17 million, to China’s SJ Semiconductor (SJS), a company listed on the U.S. entity list. This list, managed by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), includes firms deemed security threats, requiring special U.S. licenses for technology exports.
Notably, SJ Semiconductor was added in 2020 for connections with Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), China’s top chipmaker, which the U.S. alleges has links to the Chinese military. Between February 2021 and October 2022, GlobalFoundries sent 74 shipments of silicon wafers—critical materials in semiconductor manufacturing—to SJS.
This violation was reportedly due to a data error that failed to flag SJS in GlobalFoundries’ screening process. Despite the breach, GlobalFoundries voluntarily disclosed the shipments and fully cooperated with BIS, leading to a significantly reduced fine compared to potential maximum penalties.
The penalty marks one of the few instances where a prominent U.S. semiconductor firm has faced financial repercussions under the U.S. export control policies. GlobalFoundries is a significant beneficiary of the CHIPS and Science Act, aimed at bolstering U.S. chip production. Earlier this year, the company received a $1.5 billion award and $1.6 billion in federal loans to expand its New York manufacturing operations to triple its output over the next decade.
Matthew Axelrod, Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at BIS, underscored the importance of vigilance in the semiconductor sector, especially when dealing with restricted parties in China. Axelrod emphasized that the administration expects strict compliance with export controls while noting the agency’s more lenient treatment of companies that proactively disclose compliance issues and take corrective action.
The Biden administration has implemented stringent controls on chip technology sales to China, aiming to prevent U.S. advancements from fueling China’s military developments. However, enforcement has proven complex, as some companies and allied governments voice concerns over the economic impact. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) recently revealed that some of its chips have ended up in products by Huawei, a Chinese telecommunications firm under U.S. sanctions, indicating the ongoing challenges in enforcing these restrictions effectively.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Kunal Khullar is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. He is a long time technology journalist and reviewer specializing in PC components and peripherals, and welcomes any and every question around building a PC.
-
hotaru251 company does a bad thing and makes $17MReply
company fined $500k
Company: just the cost of doing business.
until punishments outweigh profits they will keep doing stuff in future. This goes for any and all companies regardless of who it is. -
michalt
If you read the article... company accidentally does bad thing. Realizes its mistake and turns itself in. Company fined far less than they would have been if they hadn't been so open.hotaru251 said:company does a bad thing and makes $17M
company fined $500k
Company: just the cost of doing business.
until punishments outweigh profits they will keep doing stuff in future. This goes for any and all companies regardless of who it is. -
Co BIY $17 million sales is not $17 million profit.Reply
Profit margin on silicon wafer sold to China ? I'm not sure. -
cuvtixo
I'm pretty sure $17 million is also valuation based on what an American company use as "retail" price, maybe for tax purposes (silicon wafers aren't consumer product, obviously). In other words, the biggest number the prosecutor could find, at least with the minimal fact checking the news article reporters might do. Also, this isn't "advanced chip IP tech", these are blanks that chip manufacturers have to put there own designs on, not the designs themselves nor finished product. This was an exercise in demonstrating that the the US government is watching and enforcing rules.Co BIY said:$17 million sales is not $17 million profit.
Profit margin on silicon wafer sold to China ? I'm not sure. -
Blitz Hacker
I'm with hotaru251 on this one, lets assume only 7 million was profit, at a $500,000 fine, that's a crappy tariff at best, it's just high lighting how the rules only apply to the poor.cuvtixo said:I'm pretty sure $17 million is also valuation based on what an American company use as "retail" price, maybe for tax purposes (silicon wafers aren't consumer product, obviously). In other words, the biggest number the prosecutor could find, at least with the minimal fact checking the news article reporters might do. Also, this isn't "advanced chip IP tech", these are blanks that chip manufacturers have to put there own designs on, not the designs themselves nor finished product. This was an exercise in demonstrating that the the US government is watching and enforcing rules.
And OFC the company 'didn't know about it' .. if they did and admitted to that they would be shut down, instead they get a $500,000 fine, and continue to do business.
At the bare minimum the profits should be taken and the $500,000 fine applied atop that.