Researchers make breakthrough in cleaning up the 'forever chemicals' used in chip manufacturing

MEMBER EXCLUSIVE
Semiconductor dicing process.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

A team at Australia's Monash University has published its work on a new water filtration membrane that can successfully remove small PFAS molecules from water flow. PFAS, or polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a key piece in multiple facets of semiconductor manufacturing that have earned the name "forever chemicals" for their difficulty to clean up.

Monash's research team is ready to utilize some key partnerships to bring the filters to market at a high scale, keeping PFAS out of the groundwater at plants in all of the various industries that work with forever chemicals. The semiconductor industry, however, has long been opposed to legislation or other initiatives to restrict its use of PFAS in fabrication, forming lobbying groups and other coalitions to conserve the use of forever chemicals in chipmaking.

Latest Videos From
Sunny Grimm
Contributing Writer

Sunny Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Sunny has a handle on all the latest tech news.

  • bit_user
    The article seems comprehensive and well-researched.
    : )
    One small critique I'd make is that cancer isn't mentioned until the 10th paragraph. I'd probably work it into the first sentence, if not the headline. I'm sure nobody is pro-cancer.

    As for regulation, I think taxing pollutants is a more productive approach than outright bans. It has the advantage of maintaining a financial incentive for the industry to support researching and eventually adopt mitigation technologies and alternatives, while not halting immediate progress.

    Also, you have to consider that an outright ban is probably just going to result in the same chemicals being used elsewhere, meaning it only solves the "my backyard" aspect of the problem. However, as PFAS tend to leak into the food chain and as our food supply chains are now quite global, we have some direct incentives to care about what's happening on a much larger scale.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I was under the impression that there was a preexisting method/tech to remove PFAS.

    Like this is from 2022: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894721055984It already achieves 90% removal using high pressure and membrane.

    There are promising technologies in development to breakdown PFAS using high-pressure and high-temperature treatment.
    https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/breaking-down-barriers-innovations-in-pfas-destruction/
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Notton said:
    I was under the impression that there was a preexisting method/tech to remove PFAS.

    Like this is from 2022: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894721055984It already achieves 90% removal using high pressure and membrane.
    That also mentions "challenges in high-recovery operation due to adsorption of PFAS and subsequent membrane fouling or scaling," and the conclusion mentions "there remains a challenge from generation of the membrane concentrate. Therefore, developing a high recovery membrane system is critical. In addition, continuous research efforts are needed not only to improve the selectivity for the vast number of PFAS molecules in various sizes, ..."

    Perhaps their graphene membrane avoids some of these issues.

    Notton said:
    There are promising technologies in development to breakdown PFAS using high-pressure and high-temperature treatment.
    https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/breaking-down-barriers-innovations-in-pfas-destruction/
    This only deals with destruction? They need to be separated, first.
    Reply
  • KryptonQuark
    Real Breakthrough ! !
    Pollution always was a serious Problem !
    Reply
  • Gururu
    I failed to see any applicability stated towards fab waste treatment (vs. waste water or landfill leachates) or volumes/quantities in the original paper. Newer, shorter chain, less toxic replacements and competing waste compounds seem to be the big reason to include something else in addition to activated carbon and ion exchange substrates. What are fabs even using if anything?
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Admin said:
    Monash University has developed a water filter to catch PFAS used in chip manufacturing and other industries. The chip industry has been lobbying for years against any progress on legislating PFAS-use.

    Researchers make breakthrough in cleaning up the 'forever chemicals' used in chip manufacturing : Read more

    how about we stop using forever chemicals in non stick food pans etc or better yet not use them at all lol.

    while its a great step in right direction they have been used in everything.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    beyondlogic said:
    how about we stop using forever chemicals in non stick food pans etc or better yet not use them at all lol.

    while its a great step in right direction they have been used in everything.
    Because the chemicals are freaking magic. From refrigerants to the absolute best termiticides, they solve a lot of problems. Though they stay around and accumulate in the body, I don't know that we attribute a lot of identified cancers to PFAS at this time.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Gururu said:
    Because the chemicals are freaking magic. From refrigerants to the absolute best termiticides, they solve a lot of problems. Though they stay around and accumulate in the body, I don't know that we attribute a lot of identified cancers to PFAS at this time.

    they cause alot of issues in the body then just cancers there linked to alot of issues.


    PFAS in general are monitored in uk drinking water since its everywhere.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Gururu said:
    Because the chemicals are freaking magic. From refrigerants to the absolute best termiticides, they solve a lot of problems. Though they stay around and accumulate in the body, I don't know that we attribute a lot of identified cancers to PFAS at this time.
    Well, we need to start co-developing chemicals with their disposal schemes. Like, perhaps you can integrate a molecular handle for use by an enzyme you co-design, so it can disassemble the thing. Then, the chemical companies can sell both the chemical and the enzymes.

    Or, another possibility is capture, purification, and reuse technologies.

    No matter what, there needs to be more pressure on industry to reduce environmental leakage of these chemicals. That would provide the incentive for them to seek alternatives and for the chemical industry to develop these mitigations. As I said, I think taxes and financial penalties work better than outright bans, in this regard.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    beyondlogic said:
    they cause alot of issues in the body then just cancers there linked to alot of issues.


    PFAS in general are monitored in uk drinking water since its everywhere.
    I totally believe it but the evidence is not convincing enough yet from what I have seen. Don't get me wrong, I have a three filter setup on my kitchen sink for drinking and cooking that is supposed to help on PFAS. Been using it for years.
    Reply