CHIPS Act beneficiaries 'mired in NIMBY fights and two-year permits' — delays to Micron, Amkor, and SK hynix NY fabs costing $5M per day

TSMC
(Image credit: TSMC)

While many fabs co-funded by the U.S. government under the CHIPS and Science Act are being built or are about to start ramping production of semiconductors, there are some facilities for which construction has not started due to environmental reviews and protests of local residents, with companies "mired in NIMBY fights and two-year permits." Among such projects are Amkor's advanced packaging facility in Arizona, Micron's DRAM fab in New York, and SK hynix's HBM facility in Indiana, reports SemiAnalysis.

Locals oppose Amkor's facility

Amkor's plan to build a $2 billion chip packaging facility near Peoria, Arizona, is facing resistance from nearby residents of Vistancia. The locals are opposing Amkor's proposed site due to concerns about the potential strain on water resources and increased traffic congestion. Some residents are threatening legal action and calling for the project to be moved elsewhere.

Amkor's advanced packaging facility, which will include over 500,000 square feet (46,451 square meters) of cleanroom space when constructed and equipped, is crucial for the local semiconductor supply chain that already includes TSMC's Fab 21 campus as well as over a dozen suppliers. The plant, which is expected to be one of the world's largest advanced packaging factories in the world, is also crucial for companies like Apple, which has committed to building chips at TSMC's Fab 21 and packaging them at Amkor's facility. However, given the ongoing protests, it remains to be seen whether the plant will come online in 2027, as planned.

Micron's $100 billion campus faces delays

The situation is not unique to Amkor and Arizona. In Clay, New York, Micron's planned massive $100 billion DRAM production site (originally expected to be completed in the 2040s and create some 50,000 direct and indirect jobs) has experienced scheduling setbacks. The company's environmental review was delayed, and the period for public feedback has been extended through August. As a result, construction, which was supposed to start in 2024, cannot begin until community objections are resolved.

The campus near Clay, New York, was expected to become the largest manufacturing site Micron has ever developed and one of the biggest semiconductor facilities in the United States. The site is projected to house four clean rooms totaling 600,000 square feet (around 55,700 square meters), which is about eight times larger than the clean room space at GlobalFoundries' Fab 8 facility.

The fab is a key part of Micron's strategy to expand its U.S. production. The initial stage of construction in Clay was projected to require approximately $20 billion in spending through the end of this decade, setting the stage for the larger buildout planned in the following years. However, Micron is facing massive delays, so instead of earning a million a day later this decade producing memory in the U.S., the company will have to invent ways to produce enough DRAM later in the 2020s. According to the report, delays on a $20B fab are costing $5M per day.

Micron planned to manufacture 40% of its DRAM output within the United States by the mid-2030s, operating its facilities near Boise, Idaho, and Clay, New York. However, given the current delay, it is unclear whether Micron manages to execute its plan.

SK hynix gets approval, but that was hard

In West Lafayette, Indiana, SK hynix obtained approval for its $3.9 billion high-bandwidth memory (HBM) production site, but it took it seven hours to persuade the city council. The company faced resistance from local residents regarding the rezoning of over 120 acres near their homes. Residents expressed concerns about industrial development near residential zones, nearly stalling the project.

The $3.9 billion facility dedicated to HBM and other exotic types of memory is expected to be one of the biggest and most sophisticated DRAM assembly facilities on the planet when it starts operations in 2028. The plant is projected to create up to 1,000 jobs, and SK hynix also plans to partner with Purdue University over future R&D projects.

Preventing delays

To prevent such delays in future developments, some states are creating pre-approved industrial locations, according to SemiAnalysis. North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Ohio have funded large-scale sites equipped with utilities and baseline environmental clearance. These areas are designed to host manufacturing operations without extended permitting procedures, making them more attractive to semiconductor firms.

Supporters of this strategy argue that early-stage preparation reduces costs, simplifies compliance, and accelerates supplier commitments. By planning infrastructure in advance, states can also impose penalties if promised investments fall through, ensuring greater accountability from companies.

Streamlining approval processes has become a competitive advantage in global technology development. According to analysis from the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, the speed at which facilities can be permitted is now a critical factor in determining the pace of semiconductor manufacturing expansion and attractiveness of countries for large chipmakers.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • thesyndrome
    This isn't unexpected, large construction projects like this frequently run into holdups from problems ranging from environmental impact causing legal concerns, supply chain issues for materials, protests from locals where the new construction lowers the quality of life for existing residents, etc.

    This has been one of the criticisms of the tariffs that I feel isn't political at all, it's simply logical to understand that you can't implement the tariffs to encourage domestic production UNLESS there are already existing domestic production facilities that are fully operational, because otherwise it results in higher prices for domestic consumers until the production facilities have been built, which can take years, and doesn't even guarantee the prices will be much lower depending on the salaries and material importing costs.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    Environmental reviews in the US often have little to do w/ genuine environmental concerns. NIMBY (Not In My Back-Yard) is an accurate label for the majority of 'em, I think.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    The NIMBY fight tells me there's no clear vision of the future for these regions. I want to dump on the NIMBY people for holding up progress, but I've had my own negative experiences with data centers and warehouses being approved adjacent to residential communities. Noise and traffic got so much worse...and the data center's cooling system made noise 24/7! I'd imagine these advanced complexes would be even more impactful.
    Reply
  • jg.millirem
    The term “NIMBY” implies irrational or childish objections - business adores the term, casting little people as getting in the way of their “progress”. I’d love for there to be a stipulation that all of their pushers and C suite types be forced to live in close proximity to these huge industrial projects. Many people who complain about “NIMBYs” have never owned a home or experienced having their domestic peace destroyed.
    Reply
  • KennyRedSocks
    As long as there wasn't too much noise pollution, I'd rather live near an industrial site than more residential housing.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    NIMBYism can often be a proxy for mistrust in government promises. Locals might worry that the jobs won’t benefit them, that housing and prices will spike, or that long term environmental damage won’t be addressed. These concerns are valid, but without a faster way to resolve them, we end up in this holding pattern where progress is paralyzed.

    So, what started as an effort to revitalize America’s semiconductor ecosystem is now exposing the country’s fragmented development pipeline. Until there’s a real push to modernize how we greenlight these projects, both from a regulatory and public trust perspective, expect more of this friction.

    These aren’t unfounded. And when community pushback is dismissed outright, it only fuels resistance.

    For the U.S. to truly capitalize on this opportunity, we’ve got to find a better middle ground....streamlined, accountable permitting processes that respect local voices and move at the speed of global competition. Otherwise, we risk watching strategic investments fizzle out in public hearings and litigation limbo.

    ...in reality, we knew this was coming.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    To add to what Loadedaxe said, large corporations have a history of exploiting the environment - such as destroying the local water supply - AND the government stands by and does nothing. Corporations only care about their profit and "increasing shareholder value".

    There's good reason to object to these being built in your area.

    (Once upon a time I lived about 7 miles (as the crow flies) from a nuclear power plant, and we could hear it in the background 24/7.)
    Reply