TSMC discloses N2 defect density — lower than N3 at the same stage of development

TSMC building
(Image credit: Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

TSMC exposed the defect density (D0) of its N2 process technology relative to its predecessors at the same stage of development at its North American Technology Symposium this week. According to the company, the defect density is below that of N3, N5, and N7 manufacturing nodes. In addition, the slide published by ComputerBase reveals that N2 is two quarters away from mass production, which means that TSMC is on-track to start making 2nm-class chips in late Q4 2025, as expected.

Although TSMC's N2 is the company's first process technology to adopt gate-all-around (GAA) nanosheet transistors, the node has lower defect density than its predecessors at the same stage of development, two quarters before mass production (MP). The predecessors — N3/N3P, N5/N4, and N7/N6 — all relied on well-known FinFET transistors. So, despite being TSMC's first node using GAA nanosheet transistors, the N2 defect density is getting lower quicker (well, steeper) than that of its predecessors before the high volume manufacturing (HVM) milestone.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • User of Computers
    this isn't particularly surprising, N3 yields at launch weren't amazing
    Reply
  • usertests
    Everyone be hating on N3, but it's going to stick around for the next 10-20 years as the last TSMC FinFET node, so they can fix it up gradually.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    usertests said:
    Everyone be hating on N3, but it's going to stick around for the next 10-20 years as the last TSMC FinFET node, so they can fix it up gradually.
    I don't think it was bad by any means, but they'd gotten too aggressive with SRAM scaling which caused yield issues with the first version. It's still a good node (and I'm sure all of the derivatives after N3E will be great) aside from clock scaling, but that seems to be an issue with TSMC's nodes in general.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    Let us see some performance on test silicon already.
    Reply
  • dalek1234
    So TSMC discloses n2 defects density when compared to previous node, which Intel hides theirs. Got it.
    Reply