G.Skill Does It Again, Claims Fastest DDR4 Memory At 3666 MHz

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Niels Broekhuijsen
Contributing Writer

Niels Broekhuijsen is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He reviews cases, water cooling and pc builds.

  • pcgaming98
    Hip hip for APUs.
    Reply
  • Willllld
    Wow, once again we raise clock and slow down the timing to compensate! Yay marketing!
    Reply
  • dstarr3
    1.35v. Nice.
    Reply
  • spectrewind
    Wow, once again we raise clock and slow down the timing to compensate! Yay marketing!

    Not sure why you were down-voted...

    https://youtu.be/dWgzA2C61z4?t=2m10s
    Reply
  • Sabishii Hito
    Wow, once again we raise clock and slow down the timing to compensate! Yay marketing!

    Raise the voltage to DDR3 levels (1.65v) and I'm positive you can tighten the timings by several clocks. Samsung DDR4 loves volts.
    Reply
  • MTWSD
    This really only benefits APU's and other integrated graphics. This is a GHz race of the most useless kind. With such high timings, it hurts CPU RAM usage more than the higher frequency brings in benefits
    Reply
  • MTWSD
    This really only benefits APU's and other integrated graphics. This is a GHz race of the most useless kind. With such high timings, it hurts CPU RAM usage more than the higher frequency brings in benefits
    Reply
  • gwiddle
    15848507 said:
    Wow, once again we raise clock and slow down the timing to compensate! Yay marketing!

    You are ignoring that the clock is usually increased at a greater increment than the timing is increased. It still results in a lesser amount of a fraction of a second to access/append memory.
    Reply
  • Omegaclawe
    Wow, once again we raise clock and slow down the timing to compensate! Yay marketing!

    This is actually decent latency at this speed. Equivalent timings on DDR3 1600 RAM would be 7.8-7.8-7.8-16.6, and I see a lot of kits on newegg with 9-9-9-24 timings at 1600. Sure, 7-8-7-24 exists, and edges out this 3666 RAM in latency in a could of important categories, but with more than double the data throughput, that speed can make a big deal on memory constrained applications.

    That in mind, very few users have the correct CPU and Usage case that they would even notice a difference.
    Reply
  • John Philips
    And then 4000mhz at 19-19-19-39... What a surprise!
    Reply