No More Silicon? Company Develops Glass CPU for Quantum Computing

A shot of the vitreous quantum chip by IonQ
(Image credit: Walker Steere/IonQ)

IonQ, a Maryland-based company with ties to the University of Duke and its Duke Quantum Center, has recently announced the development of a new, glass-based trapped-ion computing chip which replaces their previous works with silicon-based designs. 

This glass trap technology is based on etching micrometer-level-precision in fused silica glass, which will then contain the company's new computing units - reconfigurable chains of ion-based qubits. Possibility of scaling? At least triple-digits, in the current state of the technology. The company previously offered 32-qubit machines to customers, having delivered systems to major cloud services providers, including Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud. The company is calling their new architecture "reconfigurable multicore quantum architecture" - RMQA, for short.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • velocityg4
    Uh, glass is typically made of silicon.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    velocityg4 said:
    Uh, glass is typically made of silicon.
    And the article even says "silica glass" so mostly silicon.

    There is no shortage of silicon itself since it is one of the most abundant elements in the Earth's crust. What there is a shortage of is refining and wafer processing capacity to turn it into enough chips to meet demand.
    Reply
  • husker
    "IonQ has decided to go the trapped ion way when it comes to reaching quantum supremacy - the moment where problems that are impossible to solve in a classical, Turing-based computer are finally served to quantum computing's platter - and solutions emerge where billions of years of required, classical computation only existed moments ago. "
    Maybe someday quantum computers will be able to decipher this sentence.
    Reply