Nvidia GPUs Can Outperform Google Brain

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • derpderpderp
    He needs to stop buying small shirts.
    Reply
  • DarkSable
    ... okay, it's really tempting to build my own MULTIVAC now...
    Reply
  • fonzy
    Maybe we will actually see enemy AI in games actually do something correctly now.
    Reply
  • skit75
    Where did these 10 million images come from? Is it a library we can access?
    Reply
  • skit75
    The most important part of the article in my opinion, had the least amount of information.
    Reply
  • Shankovich
    I think it's already clear parallel computing beats serial workloads.
    Reply
  • bjaminnyc
    100x cheaper & 100x less power = what % of performance of google brain. Likely higher than 1%, but with simple cores. Still interesting though.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    12972099 said:
    I think it's already clear parallel computing beats serial workloads.
    Was there ever any doubt? Parallelizing workloads wherever parallelizing them was practical has been done for the past 30+ years in mainframes and mini-computers.

    The reason desktop computing is so heavily reliant on single-thread performance is because most user-interactive code does not multi-thread easily, often does not scale well or meaningfully.
    Reply
  • Blazer1985
    Yeah, still 1 cuda core != 1 cpu core so this parallelism (word that fits perfectly here) is highly incorrect imho.
    Reply
  • vaughn2k
    Skynet on it works... ;)
    Reply