Bing Cuts Itself a 10% Slice of the Search Pie
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (29) |
- Share
Bing has been gaining in popularity since it launched just before the summer and while Microsoft's share of the search market has slowly been creeping upward, it's finally hit a milestone of 10 percent.
CNet News cites a Nielson report released Monday that puts 10 percent of the search market in the bucket marked Bing. Of course, Google is still the king of the castle with 64 percent (an increase of 2.6 percent over July) and Yahoo! comes second with 16 percent (a decrease of 4.2 percent). However, Bing searches for August clocked in with 1.1 billion for the month of August, an increase of 22.1 percent over July, giving Microsoft a 10.7 percent share of the search market.
CNet reports that similar studies from the likes of ComScore also show an increase in Bing searches. Microsoft this week launched visual search for Bing, which shows users their search results in the form of a deck of pictures as opposed to just a page of hyperlinks.
Click here to see the full results of the Nielson report.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
The Web browser is essential, and to a growing number of users even more important than the operating system itself. As more tasks commonly associated with locally-installed applications are being accomplished using online services, the Web browser will only become more critical in the future. If Firefox seems like the de facto browser for Linux, that's because it is. However, Windows users will remember late last year when Internet Explorer security holes drove them en masse to Firefox, only to later discover similar exploits in Firefox. This incident drove home the need to have multiple browsers installed, if only for emergency backup use. To put these browsers through a quick (and admittedly unscientific) test, I utilized some of the Internet's most popular Web sites. For starters, I performed a few random searches on Google to gauge page-load speed. Next, I simply navigated to the Yahoo homepage. Believe it or not, that site doesn't support very many browsers. I navigated to my house using the maps at Microsoft's new Bing.com (why not test in unfriendly territory?). And finally, I played the current feature video on Hulu, and the same on YouTube. Mozilla Firefox (v. 3.0.11) Mozilla's Firefox is the undisputed king of Web browsers on the Linux platform. No matter what any given distribution has installed by default, the vast majority of Linux users rely on Firefox as their primary window into the World Wide Web. It's popularity is due in large part to the unparalleled number of custom add-ons and plug-ins available. If a feature exists on any browser, there's probably an add-on to enable it in Firefox. This browser is more stable and secure than Internet Explorer, while still performing similarly on Web site compatibility. With all this going for it, it's no wonder that Firefox holds almost one quarter of the entire Web browser market share. That means about twenty percent of current Windows users prefer it. If you don't already use this browser, regardless of your OS, you should. Opera (v. 9.64) For many years, Opera has been the third wheel at the browser party. Today, it's more like the fifth. Opera has had a long history of innovation, often including cutting-edge features before the competition. By including a thumbnailed bookmarks page, thumbnailed tab previews, and split-screen browsing (not as optional add-ons, but integrated into the default installation), the latest version of Opera is still ahead of it's time. One of the simple features that I especially like is the ability to have a separate entry in the search bar for each tab. For example, if you search for "fried chicken recipes" in one tab, and open a second tab to search for "cornbread recipes," the search bar in the second tab will not have "fried chicken recipes," but will be blank for a new search. If nothing else, Opera is a solid backup or secondary browser and is available for just about every operating system you can think of. BeOS stalwarts rejoice! SeaMonkey (v. 1.1.15) The first thing that you're sure to notice about SeaMonkey Navigator is the Netscape Navigator theme. Of all the browsers in this article, SeaMonkey was the biggest surprise. It is hands-down the best non-mainstream offering on the list, no question. This browser had no problem handling YouTube, Hulu, Yahoo, or even Microsoft Bing Maps. Apart from the theme, being an actual descendant of Netscape makes SeaMonkey very approachable to ex-users of Navigator. When you perform a search using the search bar, a pane appears on the left side of the screen displaying search results. This feature can come in handy if you have the screen real estate to spare on a wide-screen monitor. I really did not expect to find anything decent besides Firefox and Opera, but SeaMonkey is truly a great app; something that will remain installed on my machine long after this article is finished.
-
I am certain that there will be many readers who will not agree with all our choices of disappointing technologies for 2006. You may have been completely happy with some of the products mentioned and could have added a bunch more instead. While I maintain that the contestants mentioned have serious flaws, they are merely a high-profile selection of dozens or hundreds more that we have seen in 2006. Depending on your priorities, you may have chosen a completely different Top-10. However, no matter which ten products, technologies or companies you would choose, they are likely to share a key similarity. They often originate in corporations that control a dominating market share in one or more market segments and they typically ignore customer needs. History tells us that, if you keep ignoring your customers, sooner or later there will be someone who will be listening and will be taking over your business. In more recent times, it happened to Intel's microprocessors (which missed the trend towards lower power consumption), to the once big search engines of Yahoo and MSN (which underestimated Google) or to Dell (which neglected its customer service offering). The Microsoft Zune and the UMPC are too new to fall into this category, but they are great examples how much the needs of a potential customer were left out of consideration when the product was designed. The iPod and the IE7 aren't responding fast enough to changing customer needs; draft 802.11n, DRM and HDTV are industry-wide efforts that monetarize on the confusion of customers; Viiv and Live! are creating a greater expectation than they should and Sony probably needs a break to rethink vast parts of its products and businesses. While most of those things will sort out themselves, broadband is just a sad story with the least hope for improvement: It's the segment with the least amount of competitive pressure and innovation. There's need for dramatic change but as long as we have a few happy companies that can afford to ignore customer needs and are able to increase their market share by buying their competitors, it's unlikely that you will see faster and more capable broadband pipes - at an affordable price - anytime soon. Discuss this topic with other readers in our forum!
-
CES 2007: Motorola aims to raise the level of personalization for...
Las Vegas (NV) - When Ed Zander took over Motorola in 2004 after resigning as president and COO of Sun Microsystems, few people expected him to revitalize the beleaguered technology company. But thanks to new products like the popular RAZR phone, Motorola's mobile phone market share has increased from 13% to 22% in just a couple of years and its products have come to symbolize the increasing personalization of mobile devices. So why did Zander take the stage at CES riding a yellow bicycle? Cost cutting, he joked. "I practiced that a lot," Zander said. In truth, he used the bike to show how people can store and charge their mobile devices on their bikes today rather than just their cars. That shows just how far mobile communication devices have come, he said. Zander began his keynote by communicating the massive growth of mobile communication devices, saying there are four births per second on Earth compared to 25 mobile phone purchases every second. And more than any other device, Zander said, the mobile device is the most personal consumer technology item in today's world. "Nothing is as personal, and nothing is as ubiquitous as this device," Zander said, holding a Motorola phone. "This is just the beginning." Zander said that new features like digital cameras, MP3 downloads, digital video and Internet on mobile phones are being adopted more quickly than anything he's ever seen in his 25 years in the technology industry, which is helping to make generation devices more personal and intuitive than ever before. He added that the MotoFone, Motorola's recently introduced new phone, is so intuitive that even people who can't read are able to use the phone, thanks to the voice-activated command features. Ed Zander During the keynote, Zander announced a new Motorola partnership with Yahoo! Go 2.0, a new personal Internet service for mobile devices from Yahoo. In addition to search capabilities, the Yahoo! Go service can also deliver personalized news, sports, stock prices and other media. The Yahoo! Go service was indicative of Motorola's strategy to make mobile phones more like PCs. "We're pushing full throttle to get as much on these devices as have on the PC," he said. Among the products Motorola introduced were a wireless Bluetooth-enabled head set with S9 stereo headphones that connects to Motorola phones and also streams digital music; the MOTORIZR Z6, a Linux-based music device; and the MOTOMING device, also Linux-based, which features Motorola's Edge technology to enable high-speed video and entertainment media downloads. All three products are part of Motorola's MOTOMUSIC Experience platform, which includes the above products and newly announced alliances with Warner Music Group and Microsoft for downloadable content. Zander said most of the new products will be available in the first half of 2007.
Best offers
|
Windows 7 Professional (Full Product) | $299.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... | $119.95 Newegg.com More info |
|
Windows 7 Home Premium (Upgrade) | $119.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
Windows 7 Ultimate (Full Product) | $319.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
Norton Internet Security 2010 - 3 Users | $69.99 Dell Small Business More info |
Troubleshooting Windows 7 With Microsoft's Built-In Tools
Windows 7 is more stable and responsive than Vista, but no operating system is perfect (the same goes for the drivers and apps running on it). We show you a suite of tools built into Microsoft’s shiny new OS to help you troubleshoot your Windows 7 issues. Read More
-
Quick Look: Notebook Performance With Windows XP, Vista, And 7
Windows 7 is here, and we've already established that it tastes great, is less filling, and performs well. But do you want it on your notebook? We compared the performance and battery life of Windows XP, Vista, and 7 on an upper-mainstream mobile system. Read More
-
Windows 7 And Windows Vista: Performance Compared
Microsoft is hyping Windows 7 as the operating system that everyone should adopt. We'd already done a bit of benchmarking in the new OS, but we revisit a longer list of tests today, including more real-world tasks, like boot-up, hibernate, and shutdown. Read More







Just proves 10% of Internet users use the default search on IE.
Just proves 10% of Internet users can't be bothered to change or oblivious to anything but the the default search on IE.
Don't be so naive... Many people, as do I, use Bing because they like it better. Sure, some poeple use Bing because they're lazy or incompetent. But the same goes for Google users. Many google users use it because there friends recommended it, not because they like it better than the competition or have even tried the competition.
I think that microsoft got an eraser, removed "live search" from the paper, and typed B-I-N-G. And that was that. Bing's accuracy is miles behind Google.
10% market share? What live did have then? I mean, all Windows PCs that got Ie7 installed came with Live search as default search engine.
my 2 cents.
Bing is a nice try to fight the monopoly of Google,
Though the company behind bing is as a monopolist as google is, so,
I find Google does a good job, and I have no complaints!
They require absolutely zero on money, searches are fairly accurate, and my page is not bloated with ads.
I find absolutely no reason to go over to Bling.
I tried it, and probably that's where they get their 10%, that many want to see.
But my bet is before next month, most users will return to google, unless like mentioned above, they absolutely don't know how to change their default search engine!
Only 10%, even thought Bing is added "by default" when you install or upgrade to Internet Explorer 8.
By the way, think that 8% of that might be searching for pornography, since Bing's has "excellent" video search capabilities.
^Did not know that. Thanks!
Bing is not added by default when you upgrade to IE8. IE8 install ask you if you would like to change from your current default search provider. A person is then directed to a webpage to change their default. If a person was using Google and would like to change to Bing they would be able to so at this point. It's very common for certain store bought computers, such as Dells, to come with Google search bar which actually make Google the default search provider. The only reason I think Yahoo is as high as it is because of all the software that tries to install yahoo toolbar without really asking such as: Yahoo Messenger, and CCCleaner. We're even victims of the Google toolbar being slipstreamed of another install.
Even if IE8 install makes the default Bing, something else being installed after would be bound to make it either yahoo or google without little warning. Just like the infamous FOH (Fold at Home)that's slipstreamed into the AMD Catalyst install.
BING is great, I havn't used Google in weeks. Google pisses me off in the same way "Apple" does as a company. One of these "it's so cool and hip to be us, wow we're great and Microsoft sucks..." I'd bet my business technology on MS products over Apple or Google any day of the week. I don't want flavor of the day.
I've been trying it and so far I don't like it. Failed to give good search results for obvious questions, like when I searched for the Lord of the Rings Online (Lotro) or Free Freehand. I did both searches with Google and the correct pages where the first ones to appear.
I'm still gonna use it for some time to be sure, but I guess I'm not going to leave Google.
Bing is actually pretty good at certain type of search. Given the actual amount of the kind of search, Bing still have room to grow.
danish_2828:
It's true that if you had google set in IE7, IE8 will let you keep that setting if you skip past their configure, or go through the wizard.
But, if you upgrade from ie6, it automatically uses bing unless you choose another engine.
If you have ie7, chances are, you upgraded from ie6. At that time, ie7 sets the default to live search, unless you choose another engine. And if you now upgrade to ie8, it will choose bing.
So, bottom line, if you upgrade and don't know how to change it, you will be using bing. Same goes for firefox and google. At some point you would have had to choose another engine to not get the browser default. And a lot of people don't know how, or even that you can.
-Dan
I'm still trying to figure out what a "decision engine" is.
So...what does Bing offer than making your search look like playing cards?
Nothing...well...a different search engine algorithm?
Google gets me what I need, and is cut and dry.
If Bing had been at all a significant improvement results-wise, I'd choose it.
Sorry MS. Your best effort wasn't good enough.
Just proves 10% of Internet users use the default search on IE.
Just proves that someone as tech-savvy as I can switch Opera, Firefox and IE8's default and only search engine to Bing and be happy about it.
Might have been an idea to add "in the US" at least once in this article TH?
Globally Bing has 3.52%...
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/se [...] px?qprid=4
Lately I've been finding Google isn't so great. It always finds articles or forum posts from years ago. I'm not interested in stuff from 2005 or 2006. Especially when I'm searching for tech related stuff and google finds info about something similar from before the product was even released, thus being totally useless.
I've used Bing as a substitute from time to time and it has found newer more useful results.
There's a "Show options..." right above the search results where you can choose to filter any type of date range.
Bing Goes The Internet!
The best part about Bing is "Bing Cashback". It is smart enough to realize that if I'm seaching for a product I'm probably trying to purchase it or read reviews. So what does Bing do? It brings up links with Bing Cashback telling me how much I'll save going through Bing to purchase the item from online retailer like Newegg.
Like a couple weeks ago when I purchased DGL-4500. When I typed in "DGL-4500" it brought up an option of using "Cashback". 5 vendors were in the "Cashback" : Newegg, TigerDirect, Amazon, and 2 others. It showed me how much they were selling it for and if they were offering free shipping on the item. At the same time it tells me how much cash back Bing will give me to my Paypal account for going through certain vendors. At that particular time Bing was offering 6% cash back for total purchase from Newegg and they were already offering free shipping so I went ahead purchased it through Newegg. TigerDirect actually had the item cheaper but was going to charge me $10 for shipping and I was going to only get 3% cash back.
As far as I know Bing is the only search engine that has the ability to not only compare prices of a product with vendors but also give you shipping prices and cash back. Let's see Google or Yahoo do that.
And yes it works. I have already recieved $52 dollars "Cashback" from Bing over the past 2 months.
I just did the lord of the rings search just using "lotro". It came up correctly. So I don't know what "problem" you had on BING. But if you like Google, use it.
I bet the "bing jingle" is the source of popularity
I've tried Bing on several occasions.
It's a good search engine, but as with most users,
they aren't unhappy with their results and therefore will find no need to switch. There really isn't anything "broke" with their competitors' search methods- yet. Sure, search is evolving rapidly and results are bound to change and perhaps Bing will get smarter. But for now, I'll stick with Google.
I'll stay with Google for not only my satisfaction of their products (Gmail, Google Search, Picasa, etc.) but primarily, for me- I enjoy that they give Microsoft a run for their money in a number of areas. Microsoft, pre-Google was a slow, lethargic giant that HEAVILY resisted change to benefit the consumer.
Firefox pushed Microsoft to finally get serious about browsers again (seriously, would you want to have countless years of IE6 limbo?), just as Google is pushing Microsoft to strengthen their online efforts (notably Office Online and Windows Live). Without Google putting pressure on Microsoft, we wouldn't have Office Online, Bing or half of Microsoft's latest attempts to regain power.
Google may be a "monopoly", ONLY because of a GREAT product (call it the "cool" factor or whatever you want Google haters, but seriously, the product rocks by it's own merits.) Google doesn't lock in advertisers nor do they block you from searching anywhere else. But, if Microsoft (a proven monopolist that has ABUSED their power) got control of the internet, it would seriously be game over again for years without any serious competition. No other competitor has the power to make Microsoft paranoid about their own legacy products as well as the online offensive. For those reasons, I'll stick with Google.
Don't be so naive... Many people, as do I, use Bing because they like it better. Sure, some poeple use Bing because they're lazy or incompetent. But the same goes for Google users. Many google users use it because there friends recommended it, not because they like it better than the competition or have even tried the competition.
Yeap.
I like Bing, it's interesting and effective.
However I use Google because I love them, and generally I always find what I need anyways.
The best part about Bing is "Bing Cashback". It is smart enough to realize that if I'm seaching for a product I'm probably trying to purchase it or read reviews. So what does Bing do? It brings up links with Bing Cashback telling me how much I'll save going through Bing to purchase the item from online retailer like Newegg. Like a couple weeks ago when I purchased DGL-4500. When I typed in "DGL-4500" it brought up an option of using "Cashback". 5 vendors were in the "Cashback" : Newegg, TigerDirect, Amazon, and 2 others. It showed me how much they were selling it for and if they were offering free shipping on the item. At the same time it tells me how much cash back Bing will give me to my Paypal account for going through certain vendors. At that particular time Bing was offering 6% cash back for total purchase from Newegg and they were already offering free shipping so I went ahead purchased it through Newegg. TigerDirect actually had the item cheaper but was going to charge me $10 for shipping and I was going to only get 3% cash back. As far as I know Bing is the only search engine that has the ability to not only compare prices of a product with vendors but also give you shipping prices and cash back. Let's see Google or Yahoo do that.And yes it works. I have already recieved $52 dollars "Cashback" from Bing over the past 2 months.
Google products can do comparisions, but it lacks on the shipping area.
I've heard great things about Bing cashback, so I may use it next time I'm looking to buy.
its easy, as many default vista laptops and desktops comes with default Ie8 and most of the common users don't know how to use them or they dont give a crap, the default search engine stays as Bing. The other issue is that everytime you make a mistake on address bar, bing automatically comes in and search your error, so thats a nifty way of getting the 10%
I didn't know about the cash back and free shipping feature. I think I'll go check it out.
Bing has some good search reuslts.
9% Slice of the Search Pie got conned i didnt even see that i was using it for a few days i dont recall loading it or giving permission to put it on my pc but hello!!! there it was.
back to goole 4 me, which is so much better
Bing has been the first search engine I use for about 2 or 3 months now. The results tend to be newer and it tends to generate more relevant image and video search results. They also always have a great stock photo for the day that adds a little something interesting to the page.
Google often works better though. I still find myself using it regularly too. Although I don't use it often, Ask.com will often come up with entirely different results than either Bing or Google. Your just another brand fan-boy or thoughtless hater if you're going to pigeon-hole yourself into relying on just one search engine.