If we relate I/O operations per second in our streaming read test to the power consumed during this test, the new 7K1000.C tops the group. The 7K1000.B follows closely behind. Efficiency-wise, the five-platter Deskstar 7K1000 pales in comparison.
Results are similar for the I/O efficiency test, where we found fewer significant performance differences. Still, power consumption for the newer drives has decreased a lot, resulting in a huge efficiency leap.
You'd think that the five-platter 7K1000 would make most noise, but it doesn’t. Although noise perception can vary subjectively, we found that the three-platter 7K1000.B actually made the most noise on our test bench.
Things change in the activity test under high I/O loads. In this case, the larger number of moving parts handicaps the original Deskstar 7K1000 with its five platters and ten heads.
- Less Platters, More Performance, Better Efficiency
- Deskstar 7K1000 (Five Platters, 2007)
- Deskstar 7K1000.B (Three Platters, 2008)
- Third Generation 7K1000.C (Two Platters, 2009)
- Test Setup And Throughput Comparison Diagram
- Benchmark Results: Access Time And I/O Performance
- Benchmark Results: Throughput And Streaming
- Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage Application Performance
- Benchmark Results: Power Consumption
- Benchmark Results: Efficiency And Noise Level
- Comparison Table And Conclusion