Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark

System Builder Marathon, August 2012: System Value Compared
By

Unlike most real-world games, 3DMark does award higher scores to platforms with higher-end processors in them, favoring higher core counts, in particular.

Conversely, the benchmark does reflect a shift from CPU to GPU dependence as resolution and detail levels increase. In fact, the baseline $1000 PC manages to beat the $2000 build at stock settings in 3DMark's Extreme preset, despite the fact that both builds include GeForce GTX 670s.

A combination of a weak dual-core CPU and less powerful graphics card put the $500 build more than 50% below Don's $1000 PC.

The $2000 PC’s SSD isn’t just bigger; it's also a faster model. Drive performance is the largest contributor to our PCMark results, though CPU architecture and clock rate play a significant role, too.

Here’s how my PC's advantage compares in a few synthesized real-world benchmarks (as opposed to pure synthetics, like SiSoftware's Sandra). CPU overclocking doesn’t help here, so the difference you see between the $2000 PC’s stock and overclocked settings is due to a reversion back to Windows 7's native AHCI driver in the overclocked configuration.

The performance of Paul's $500 PC isn't horrible. It's simply a byproduct of his mechanical disk.

React To This Article