Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Test Hardware And Benchmarks

AMD's Radeon HD 5870: Before And After A Year Of Driver Updates
Test Hardware
Intel Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge), 3.3 GHz, LGA 1155, 6 MB Shared L3, Power-savings enabled
Gigabyte GA-H67MA-UD2H
Kingston Hyper-X 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) DDR3-1333 @ DDR3-1333/1066, 1.5 V
Hard Drive
Intel X25-M 160 GB SSDSA2M160G2GC, SATA 3Gb/s (System Drive)
AMD Radeon HD 5870 1 GB
Power Supply
Sparkle 1250 W, 80 PLUS
System Software and Drivers
Operating System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
DirectX 11
Graphics DriverAMD Catalyst 11.1

AMD Catalyst 10.8

AMD Catalyst 10.3

AMD Catalyst 9.10
Lost Planet 2
Highest Quality Settings, No AA / No AF, 4x MSAA / 16x AF, vsync off, 1680x1050 / 1900x1080 / 2560x1600, DirectX 11, Steam version
Just Cause 2
Highest Quality Settings, No AA / 2x AF, 8x AA / 16x AF, vsync off, 1680x1050 / 1920x1080 / 2560x1600, Bokeh filter and GPU water disabled (for Nvidia cards), Concrete Jungle Benchmark
Metro 2033
High Quality Settings, AAA / 4x AF, 4x MSAA / 16x AF, 1680x1050 / 1920x1080 / 2560x1600, Built-in Benchmark, Steam version
F1 2010
Ultra High Settings, No AA / No AF, 8x AA / No AF, 1680x1050 / 1920x1080 / 2560x1600, Steam version, Custom benchmark script, DX11 Rendering
Aliens vs. Predator Benchmark
High Quality Settings, SSAO, No AA / 16xAF, Ultra Quality Settings, 4x MSAA / No AF, vsync off, 1680x1050 / 1920x1080 / 2560x1600
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
Custom (Highest) Quality Settings, No AA / No AF, 8x MSAA / 16xAF, 1680x1050 / 1920x1080 / 2560x1600, opening cinematic, 145 second sequence, FRAPS
Performance Default
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm
Ultra Quality Settings, No AA / 16x AF, 8x AA / 16x AF, From Crushblow to The Krazzworks, 1680x1050 / 1920x1080 / 2560x1600, FRAPS, DirectX 9 Rendering
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 89 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 4 Hide
    dallaswits , March 17, 2011 4:26 AM
    I run a 5850, have loved it, and always get the newest driver.
  • 3 Hide
    sabot00 , March 17, 2011 4:38 AM
    Wow, someone is really pissy.
  • 1 Hide
    cangelini , March 17, 2011 4:40 AM
    More like someone has been really moderated ;-)
  • 2 Hide
    Assmar , March 17, 2011 4:45 AM
    hahahyoursowrong"The moral of the story: be sure your graphics card drivers are always up to date."I'd love to cept I get a blue screen every time and can't even get to windows going from 10.4 to the newest.

    Uninstall all drivers before installing new ones.
  • 3 Hide
    opmopadop , March 17, 2011 4:47 AM
    If that guy who created/posted his problem 5 times spent that much effort understanding why his rig BSOD'd when he used the latest set, he might have resolved his problem by now.
  • 3 Hide
    slyphnier , March 17, 2011 4:47 AM
    ever since 10.11 ... many user got "100% GPU usage" and "top right mouse lag" issue
    11.4 early preview still having the issue
    from what i know the issue above mostly effect radeon 5000series (5850 and 5970)
    for people having those issue forced to stick with 10.10e

    still no news when amd will fix those issue, as from what i heard amd can't replicate the issue on their lab, thus can't fix it
  • 6 Hide
    Assmar , March 17, 2011 4:49 AM
    I know you're terribly busy, but any way we can get the CF comparisons from then and now, even if it isn't as thorough?
  • 1 Hide
    Zeh , March 17, 2011 4:51 AM
    I'm eager for a new driver release. I've switched my old 4670 ddr2 for a 6850. In some games I'm having a few VSync problems, and the overall performance during video playback has decreased and I have no idea why, quality did not change, or at least I didn't see any changes.

    This 6850 just doesn't feel as rock solid as the good old 4670, which never gave me any trouble. Here's hoping new drivers will solve my issues. Else, I might even switch to a pair of GeForces instead of getting another 6850 for crossfire.
  • 3 Hide
    cangelini , March 17, 2011 4:57 AM
    assmarI know you're terribly busy, but any way we can get the CF comparisons from then and now, even if it isn't as thorough?

    Excellent story idea, assmar.
  • 2 Hide
    Darkerson , March 17, 2011 5:11 AM
    I dunno, the entire time I had my 5770 (a little over a year), I never had any driver issues. It was part of the reason I decided to pull the trigger on a 6950 instead of something from the Nvidia camp. The only time I had any driver issues with ATI was back when I had an old 9800SE, but I more assumed it was because I had soft modded it. YMMV I suppose.
  • 2 Hide
    scrumworks , March 17, 2011 5:23 AM
    howiejceeAndrew Ku forgot to mention that ATI's lousy drivers have and for the foreseeable future will always have problems.Not to say that Nvidia occasionally has driver issues, but at least they fix the problems. Only 10.9 and a couple versions before that don't give my 5870 any major problems.

    Nice trolling man.
  • -4 Hide
    reprotected , March 17, 2011 5:40 AM
    I'm not liking the new AMD drivers. They were never good in the first place. Sure Nvidia screwed up by burning a few video cards, but they are easier to manage IMO.
  • 1 Hide
    Maziar , March 17, 2011 6:14 AM
    I were happy with the driver updates until 10.11 All drivers from 10.11 and up give me numerous problems such as 99% GPU usage,high 2D clocks etc. So unfortunately for some people,new drivers have much problems.
  • 2 Hide
    Olle P , March 17, 2011 6:26 AM
    I've previously done my own comparison of driver performance, but not at this level.
    The conclusions I made (based on upgrades done after the hardware was about two years old) were that:
    - Returns are diminishing as the hardware gets older.
    The manufacturer will spend less time updating drivers for a three year old card than they do updating for the latest generation.
    - Returns can even be negative when paired with older software.

    It would have been very nice to see the test incorporate some of the benchmarks used to test the 5870 when it was released, to see if/how these have improved.
  • 2 Hide
    haplo602 , March 17, 2011 6:27 AM
    now try the same for Linux and cry :-)

    just kidding. the drivers game is the same for both camps. Nvidia is usualy more stable while AMD tries to improve often even at the cost of regresions.

    the issue with the AMD driver schedule is that they alternate development teams. basicaly fixes from one driver release don't have to be included in the next, since the development started before the current one was finished. it's mostly visible on Linux drivers. One release fixes an issue and it's back in he next one.
  • 1 Hide
    Assmar , March 17, 2011 6:51 AM
    cangeliniExcellent story idea, assmar.

    That's because you were already working on it, weren't you? :p 
  • 1 Hide
    mactronix , March 17, 2011 6:54 AM
    If they spent more time on stability instead of trying to get 3 more FPS out of the latest AAA game to make it seem as if they have the best cards in benchmarks then everyone would be happier IMHO
  • 3 Hide
    AMW1011 , March 17, 2011 7:13 AM
    Nice Tom's. You hit another one out the park. Driver improvements do make a nice difference, and are important. Thanks for the quality article Tom's.
  • 3 Hide
    executor2 , March 17, 2011 7:46 AM
    Wonderful article , thanks Tom`s Hardware.
Display more comments