Best offers
|
Edge Z30 Midsize Desktop (2.66GHz... | $1099.00 Velocity Micro More info |
|
iMac All-In-One Desktop (3.06GHz... | $1699.00 AppleStore.com More info |
|
Compaq Presario CQ5210F Mini-Tower... | $399.98 STAPLES More info |
|
Pavilion p6210f Mini-Tower Desktop... | $526.98 STAPLES More info |
|
Pavilion p6240f Mini-Tower Desktop... | $699.98 STAPLES More info |
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links
We expected the higher-clocked, higher-priced, more elaborate Dell XPS 720 H2C Edition system to win the majority of benchmarks, but it also cost 72% more than the Gateway FX530XT we tested. We don't remember the higher-cost Dell taking many wins by so large a margin, so let's do a brief performance recap.

A 72% price increase for the Dell XPS 720 H2C returned an average 50% performance gain in only one of the three games we tested. Averaging the performance difference of all three games narrowed Dell's lead to 38%

Non-graphics applications do not gain from SLI mode, so Dell's lead was dependant mostly on its CPU clock speed advantage. A 21% performance lead in OGG is an impressive result given the clock speed difference of 17% between the two systems, but averaging the three applications narrowed Dell's overall lead to 16%.

3D Mark 2005 shows the most significant performance differences of the synthetic benchmarks, but SYSmark gives the moderately-priced Gateway FX530XT a slight lead. We simply didn't find any 72% average performance gains, regardless of the test suite.
So the Dell 720 H2C Edition costs 72% more than the Gateway FX530XT but delivered far smaller performance gains. What would it look like if we averaged all the differences?

A 72% increase in cost gives Dell a 26% average performance lead. That's nearly three times the cost per performance increase!
Conclusion
The Gateway FX530XT is far from cheap, but its price is middle-of-the-road for its market. That market includes such necessities as a 24" widescreen display, which was included with both systems.
Our only regret was that software configurations for the previous Gateway FX530XT and the new version prevented us from making a direct comparison. We certainly wanted to know how much better a single 8800GTX performed than a CrossFire pair of X1950's, but it simply wasn't in the cards (so to speak!).
Some buyers in the high-end market might believe that a 72% price increase for the Dell system we compared is a small price to pay for a 26% performance gain, given the increased productivity such performance can bring. But for those whose incomes seem a little more limited, the FX530XT delivers all the performance they'll likely need for at least a year, at a much more reasonable cost.
- Can a GATEWAY P-6831 FX be upgraded from a 8800m GTS to a 8800m GTX? [Laptops & Notebooks]
- GTX 280 vs. 9800GT x2 in SLI [Graphic & Displays]
- Tough choices... help me decide please =) [Laptops & Notebooks]
- Pc gaming with 24 inch 1920x1200 monitor. or 40 inch lcd tv? [Graphic & Displays]
- Problem with new board? [Opinions and Experiences]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- How many PC's do you have?
- My New Build Please Rate It
- Best combo for Flight Simulator X???
- What should I upgrade next?
- What psu????
- Laptop recommendations.
- MoBo replacement on Gateway PCs?
- New rig, group purchase, for gaming, photo, video and audio editing
- Post Your sexy Computers. Get the nicest Angle;)
- Upgrade? Compatibility? Suggestions? Bueller!?
- $2700 gaming tower
- Picking your brain
- Mobile Graphics Decisions.
- Workstation-Shootout: ATi FireGL V7600 vs. Nvidia Quadro FX 4600




