All about Internal Storage
 Latest Internal Storage articles
All Internal Storage articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
Ads

Sponsored links

120 GB At 5,400 RPM: Western Digital Scorpio WD1200BEVS

Previous Next
7:29 AM - 11/28/2006 by Sean Kerner

Unlike Toshiba's MK2035GSS, Western Digital's Scorpio WD1200BEVS isn't a milestone release for 2.5 " drives.It is, however, a respectable drive with performance values that are solid, though not chart topping. The drive spins at a rotational speed of 5,400 RPM, uses a SATA/150 interface for transfer rates of up to 150 MB/s, supports Native Command Queuing (NCQ) and has an 8 MB buffer.

Western Digital's published specifications indicate read seek time of 12 ms. Access time (including rotational latency) as measured in our labs for the WD1200BEVS compares very well against other 5,400 RPM drives. We measured 17.6 ms for WD1200BEVS, which isn't top of the list, but is faster than comparable 5,400 RPM drives from Fujitsu (Fujitsu MHV2120BH).

In our tests, we found the Scorpio WD1200BEVS to have an attractive interface transfer rate (as measured by interface bandwidth) of 115 MB/s. Surprisingly, though the Toshiba MK2035GSS packs more capacity at 200 GB, the WD1200BEVS packs more weight. Scorpio tips the scales at 117 g according to Western Digital's published spec, which is 19% heavier than Toshiba's 200 GB drive at 98 g.

Western Digital is marketing the WD1200BEVS as 5,400 RPM drive with power specs that are inline with what 4,200 RPM drives require. Our tests didn't bear out that assertion. From a power perspective, our tests found the WD1200BEVS pulls 1.0 Watts while idle and 3.2 Watts under load.

Talkback
Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links