- Hard Disk Drive Video Players Hit The Mainstream
- The Optoma EP729 Road Warrior Projector
- Pinnacle Showcenter 200 Brings HD To The Living Room
- VGA Charts VII: AGP Update Summer 2005
- 24 Pipelines of Power! NVIDIA 7800 GTX
- Nvidia Launches GeForce 7800 GTX Graphics Chip
- Divx 6: High-Resolution Video Saves Space
- Diamond XtremeTV PVR-550RC: Not Quite Ready for Prime Time
- Capturing Videos using the Turtle Beach Video Advantage
- ATI Puts NVIDIA's SLI in the CrossFire
- CPU Overheating HSF Questions
- Hitting a FSB wall too early?
- WHAT WE ALL BE WAITING FOR!!!TRUE COPPER!!!!!!
- Should I air or water cool my gaming rig?-Please help!
- AMD X4 9850BE(2.5GHZ) VS INTEL QUAD Q9650(3.0GHZ) FASTER??
- Micron Releases Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR3 1333MHz Memory Modules
- Gigabyte with Patriot Viper PC-6400
- Trying to find the right motherboard
- In over my head choosing mobo... help?
- Alot of things
The Intel Integrated Graphics Gamer
The Intel Integrated Graphics Gamer

So where does that leave the gamer who doesn't want to invest in a separate graphics card? According to Silva, you can still play "a high level of a game on an [Intel] seven-dollar processor." A game such as Guild Wars, for example, plays very well on a 945G chipset, he said. "We think the performance [with our 945G chipset] is acceptable for a mainstream gaming experience," Silva said.
However, Silva also conceded that Intel has no pretensions that its graphics processors are geared for high-end gaming experiences. Intel leaves the computationally-intensive graphics rendering tasks to the likes of ATI and NVIDIA's graphics cards.
"In a perfect world, I would like a game like Doom to play on our graphics part on very low and minimum settings," Silva said. "But if the customers really like the game, they would go buy a graphics card."
- Previous page Intel's Philosophy As The Graphics King
- Next page Just Not Good Enough?

