M3 MacBook Air hits eye-popping 114 degrees Celsius in stress test and didn't melt — temperature settles down at 100 degrees after thermal throttling

Thermal throttling on the M3 Macbook Air.
(Image credit: Max Tech)

The M3 MacBook Air can hit up to 114 degrees Celsius on its hottest core, according to testing from Max Tech. While modern processors, whether they're in laptops or desktops, are designed to run pretty hot, the M3 MacBook Air surprised with its peak temperature of 114 degrees Celsius. Stress testing shows that temperatures eventually fall to roughly 100 degrees Celsius but at the cost of performance.

The newest version of the MacBook Air launched this week with the latest M3 chip. Since the M1-powered MacBook Air, the lightweight Apple laptop has used no active cooling and relies on passive cooling through the heatsink and chassis to achieve silent operation. Naturally, this forces the MacBook Air's processor to operate at a higher temperature, and the M3 model is no different.

However, the degree to which the M3 MacBook Air gets hot is surprising. Max Tech took his 15-inch model out for a spin in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme and Cinebench 2024 and saw the hottest core inside the M3 hit 114 degrees Celsius multiple times. Under load, the average CPU and GPU temperature can peak at 107 and 103 degrees, respectively. This resulted in the chassis hitting 46 degrees Celsius or 115 degrees Fahrenheit at its hottest point.

The M2 MacBook Air had similar heat issues under load, though it's unclear if any were getting as hot as 114 degrees. Back then, Max Tech suggested placing thermal pads on the inside of the MacBook Air to facilitate better thermal transfer, which may also work for the M3 model.

This heat is unsustainable for a processor to maintain safely, so the M3 gradually lowered its frequency and power consumption throughout the stress tests. This allowed the chip to settle in at around 100 degrees, which is still hot but is still considered safe by the industry.

Of course, this means performance declines too; in our own M3 MacBook Air review, we saw the 15-inch model's performance in Cinebench R23 by about 10% and the 13-inch by 20% from the first run to the 20th. Graphics performance can also decline substantially per Max Tech's results from 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, which saw a 27% decline from the 15-inch MacBook Air's best to worst results.

Though the M3 MacBook Air does certainly overheat and hits an incredibly high temperature, it's not clear if that's a significant issue. The MacBook Air has never been a high-performance device, even with a fan, so it sees a performance drop throughout an intensive workload, which is unsurprising. Additionally, its lifespan should be acceptable if a processor isn't constantly running at a high temperature. To sustain performance over a long period, you'll want the MacBook Pro.

Matthew Connatser

Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.

  • hotaru251
    100 degrees, which is still hot but is still considered safe by the industry.

    makes me wonder how the longevity of these will be as heat is bad enough but almsot worse is the high heat to cool cycling over time.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Well there goes the promise of ARM/RISC being smaller thus being cooler and using less power, etc etc.
    Reply
  • kremenny
    And the GPU/memory is on the same die. They better make it convenient to swap out the whole circuit board.
    Reply
  • kaalus
    What is more noticeable: 20% reduction in performance or 50dB whine from the cooling fans? I'll take the drop in performance any day.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Ever since I saw mods for the M2 MBA I just assumed this is partially a segmentation thing. They could make the cooling on the MBA much better than it is, but that would add weight/size/noise and also put it in the same performance range as the lower end MBP.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    ezst036 said:
    Well there goes the promise of ARM/RISC being smaller thus being cooler and using less power, etc etc.
    its apple.

    they aren't usually known for cooling solutions.

    they try to keep it small as heck. an actual proper thermal solution would likely tame this by a large amount.
    Reply
  • George³
    Silicon
    Melting point1687 K (1414 °C, 2577 °F)
    From Wikipedia.
    What expected to be melting in MacBook when only hotpoint going to 114°?
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    Just another example of Apple shooting for form over function. But it's okay, cos Apple get a free pass from their devout following.

    It could form the backbone of their next marketing campaign: Our new doobrey has the magical potential to imbue your fingertips with blisters.

    I can see people queueing around the block already, credit cards and iPhones, poised and ready for another outlay of multiple thousands, glinting in the early morning sunlight.
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    George³ said:
    Silicon
    Melting point 1687 K (1414 °C, 2577 °F)
    From Wikipedia.
    What expected to be melting in MacBook when only hotpoint going to 114°C?
    Its not silicon melting that has ever been the issue, its typically Electron migration usually via Copper migration path that leads to shorts and ultimately chip failure. Higher heat will accelerate chip failure at both Silicon and PCB.

    Quality assurance on chips uses heat to accelerate chip failure. A tester will repeated burn chips (put in an oven, then run them in a normal or max temp environment) this is to imitate aging, Usually running them through burn in cycles till failure or measure performance degradation and estimate lifetime failure rates based on the curve of a given electrical degradation. Fact is heat(and/or high voltage) will eventually kill electronic circuitry, whether that is 1 year, 5 years, or 100 years is a big deal.

    As the macbook only has a 1 year warranty, maybe this is by design, as I think even at 114°C it will pass the warranty threshold, but I would not expect serviceable life up to 5 years... They have other issues that prevent longevity though that may prove to fail sooner
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Product segmentation. The Air isn't intended to be used in the same kind of tasks that the Pro is, else every review would end with "Save $500, skip the Pro, and get the Air instead".
    Reply