''Evolved'' Exynos 5 Octa Still Has Two Core Sets

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • I think a 6 core design would have been better. 2 cores is all that is needed to run the OS well so it should have 2 power saving cores and 4 performance cores. This would save more energy
    Reply
  • pacomac
    WQXGA (250 x1600) - Really?

    Don't people ever proof read these articles these days?
    Reply
  • darthvidor
    250 x 1600 ... at least we know humans still write the articles :)
    Reply
  • eastyy
    still puzzled why a intelligent quad core would be any different if the quad core turned of cores and reduced clock speed when needed
    Reply
  • eastyy
    still puzzled why a intelligent quad core would be any different if the quad core turned of cores and reduced clock speed when needed
    Reply
  • SlitWeaver
    Could you imagine actually trying to use a screen with a resolution of 250 x 1600? Great for reading...maybe? lol TH, you should fix that ;)
    Reply
  • darkchazz
    Thanks to Samsung's closed sources, their exynos devices will never get stable cyanogenmod/AOKP roms. This one won't be any different.
    Just take a look at the SGS4 xda page. The amount of development happening with the exynos octa (i9500) variant is pathetic compared to the snapdragon (i9505 LTE) variant.
    Reply
  • halcyon
    Did any US-bound phones get the 5410? It would be a neat conversation piece to see the 5420 in the Note 3.
    Reply
  • silverblue
    "What Samsung has done is ripped out the three PowerVR SGX544MP3 GPU cores (which clocked at 533 MHz) and threw in six ARM Mali-T628 GPU cores."

    Sorry, I'd have put "thrown" (i.e. they have thrown as opposed to they have threw).
    Reply
  • renz496
    i'm don't follow much about SoC stuff but why need up to four cores for the 'slow' cores? the slow cores supposed to handle low cpu intensive work so does it really need that many cores (in this case 4) to handle all the light task?

    Reply