Nvidia N1X SoC leaks with the same number of CUDA cores as an RTX 5070 — N1X specs align with the GB10 Superchip

NVIDIA and mediatek press chip release
(Image credit: NVIDIA)

Nvidia's long-rumored and long-delayed N1X SoC has broken cover once again, this time revealing its GPU capabilities through a fresh Geekbench OpenCL listing. We've seen various CPU-focused leaks surrounding this chip before, but this provides our first genuine look at the GPU. That being said, this isn’t final silicon—it’s an early engineering sample—but the details are enough to show where Nvidia is headed with its first consumer-class ARM SoC for laptops and possibly desktops.

The Geekbench entry confirms a 20-core CPU setup split into two 10-core clusters, built on Nvidia’s Grace architecture. More importantly, it confirms 48 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs), translating to 6,144 CUDA cores—the exact count as the desktop GeForce RTX 5070. Interestingly, these specs also match Nvidia’s GB10 Superchip, which currently powers the DGX Spark AI mini-PCs, suggesting that N1X might be a repurposed, possibly lower-power version aimed at the mainstream market. After all, they're both ARM-based chips developed in unison with MediaTek.

Performance, however, is still in the rough. This sample clocked in at a modest 1.05 GHz and scored 46,361 in OpenCL, roughly in the territory of the RTX 2050. The reason is power and frequency limits, which are typical of early prototypes, as well as the absence of dedicated GDDR memory, since the SoC relies on shared LPDDR5X.

Nvidia N1X Geekbench OpenCL score

(Image credit: Geekbench)

Even in this state, the N1X’s iGPU is already outpacing every modern integrated GPU, including Apple’s M3 Max and AMD’s 890M, which top out at around 37,500 in similar benchmarks. The GPU performance ceiling is higher, given that a fully powered RTX 5070 boosts to 2.5 GHz with a 250W TDP, while the N1X is capped at around 120W for the entire chip.

This isn’t the first time the N1X has appeared on Geekbench. Earlier leaks revealed its CPU performance was competitive but not earth-shattering, which is to be expected from unfinished drivers and firmware. With the latest listing, Nvidia is signaling a hybrid approach: pairing a Blackwell GPU core array with an ARM-based CPU cluster, aiming for a balance of AI performance, gaming, and efficiency—similar to how AMD’s Strix Halo and Apple’s M-series chips are positioned.

There’s still no launch date in sight. Rumors suggest a Q1 2026 release, possibly timed to coincide with the next wave of AI-focused Windows laptops, as Microsoft appears to be holding up on that at the moment. For now, Nvidia's N1X sits in the shadows, a prototype with the specs of a mid-tier discrete GPU and ambitions to push iGPU performance into uncharted territory.

If Nvidia gives this chip the power and bandwidth it needs, the N1X could be the first ARM-based SoC to seriously challenge x86 giants like AMD and Intel on high-performance laptops—and maybe even take a bite out of Apple’s lead in the premium AI laptop segment.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • Flayed
    You have the sentence that starts with "Even in this state" repeated.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    AMD and Intel is ded
    Reply
  • jlake3
    Software support and pricing is going to make or break this thing. The iGPU on Apple's "Max" chips has theoretically been amazing for a mobile platform ever since the M1 Max, but the catalog of Apple Silicon optimized AAA titles has been too narrow and the price of hardware too high for the M4 Max MacBook Pro to get any gaming recommendations.

    If laptops with these chips come in at $2,000+, but you can only play Nvidia-sponsored new releases natively and older games end up stuck with a translation layer that isn't absolutely top-notch... that's not gonna be great. And if these are only a small sliver of the Windows gaming market, getting people to optimize and QA for Windows-on-ARM without an Nvidia sponsorship may be hard.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Amdlova said:
    AMD and Intel is ded
    In the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, Strix Halo 8060S is "between" the 5070 and the early N1X result. Strix Halo is 94% faster than the N1X, and RTX 5070 is 106% faster than Strix Halo. The N1X is going to get better than that, but how much?

    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/nvidias-desktop-pc-chip-holdup-purportedly-tied-to-windows-delays-ongoing-chip-revisions-and-weakening-demand-also-blamed
    We have a bunch of blame going around for why the N1X is not coming soon. Eventually, it will be competing with faster Medusa Halo (2027?).
    Reply
  • Mr Majestyk
    So Moore's Law is Dead was right. 6 months ago he said Nvidia insiders told him they were going for AMD's jugular and wanted to dominate Strix Halo. If these specs are in final silicon, this would really put a cat amongst the pigeons, even more so with strong rumours Medusa Halo is cancelled. Qualcomm should be even more worried as their iGPU even in second gen Oryon will be light years behind. As much as I loathe Nvidia, this sounds exciting. This would also be a monster for productivity. I hope by the time of release, Windows for ARM is more polished and the vast majority of apps I would use run on ARM natively, rather than rely on emulation.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    Amdlova said:
    AMD and Intel is ded
    I really don’t see this chip hugely affecting AMD at all. It will require emulation/translation layers to run anything that’s x86. ARM won’t have a chance of taking the client PC market until they make an effort get the big publishers to get most modern AAA games running natively on ARM. Emulating PC games on newer high powered ARM devices is gaining a lot of popularity, but it’s silly to burn Steam Deck levels of power to get half the Steam Deck’s performance on better than Steam Deck hardware because you’re playing through an x86 to ARM emulation layer with DXVK bootstrapped to the top because nobody gives phone GPUs DirectX compatibility, even the damn literal RDNA GPU Samsung buys in from AMD doesn’t have DieectX support.
    Reply
  • aberkae
    jlake3 said:
    Software support and pricing is going to make or break this thing. The iGPU on Apple's "Max" chips has theoretically been amazing for a mobile platform ever since the M1 Max, but the catalog of Apple Silicon optimized AAA titles has been too narrow and the price of hardware too high for the M4 Max MacBook Pro to get any gaming recommendations.

    If laptops with these chips come in at $2,000+, but you can only play Nvidia-sponsored new releases natively and older games end up stuck with a translation layer that isn't absolutely top-notch... that's not gonna be great. And if these are only a small sliver of the Windows gaming market, getting people to optimize and QA for Windows-on-ARM without an Nvidia sponsorship may be hard.
    For me if Nvidia decided to develop thier own OS or use Steam OS as primary or secondary OS would actually be more exciting than having to rely on Windows for growth for maximum low level efficiency. Will put Microsoft on notice and might start to threaten Apple as well.
    Crazy how Intel is ironically about to really be in the rear view mirror if it doesn't get it's footing right. Also this might cause AMD to upgrade it's APUs to a higher rdna/udna nomenclature than the 3.5 version in current lineup which is also inferior to the ai capabilities of Intel's mobile apus xess and frame gen found in the ultra 258v. By the time this comes out Intel will surely have a successor to Lunar lake 288v or whatever the direct competitor chip is.
    While the gpu side obviously Nvidia has the lead on all but when it comes to the cpu its a tough competition. Nvidia needs to get this right and start swinging out the gate. Hopefully the delay gives all players time to fortify their positions accordingly for some healthy competition in this space.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    The big "AAA" almost stuck with the gamergate 2.0
    Intel is almost dead...
    Only AMD making chips every one will jump to ARM cpus. Server/enterprise level has 10% market share, Amd has 27% ish.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/arm-aims-to-capture-50-percent-of-data-center-cpu-market-in-2025
    Nvidia will make everything to take a big piece of this pie.
    Reply