New Samsung Google Chromebook Unveiled, Priced at $249

26

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zak Islam
Contributor

Zak Islam is a freelance writer focusing on security, networking, and general computing. His work also appears at Digital Trends and Tom's Guide. 

  • mynameis1
    dud. stick with tablets.
    Reply
  • damianrobertjones
    "The Chromebook's 11.6-inch display boasts a resolution of 1366 x 768, which is accompanied by 16GB of internal storage and 2GB of RAM. Battery life claims to be over six hours." + 6.5 hours of battery life?

    Sure it might be at a reasonable price but the spec REALLY does suck
    Reply
  • This product is a huge step backwards. I wish Google and Samsung would focus on innovative Android tablets. Let Microsoft go its own way with Surface and Windows 8. The only future for Google/Motorola is tablets and HTML5 - they should focus there. Samsung has a bright future as the component provider for other companies' tablets, as well as making their own. They both must have too much money to be wasting it here.
    Reply
  • jerm1027
    Exynous 5 A15? 11.6" and 2.5 lbs? 6+ hours of battery? This might be worth checking out now, especially at this lower price point.
    Reply
  • guess who
    The analyst idiots:

    "But for another $100 or so, you can get a full laptop running Windows. That's a much better deal"

    Maybe it is not a better deal. You cannot get a $350 "full laptop" that weighs 2.5 lbs and has a 6+ hr battery life. Similarly, you cannot get a full Windows laptop that is as simple and secure as a Chromebook. If you have ever had to ask/pay for help due to OS/SW/malware issues, Chromebooks may be superior.

    They are not for everyone, but for simple needs, they may be perfect.

    Like I said: Analyst idiots
    Reply
  • abbadon_34
    that's still a lot of money just to surf the internet
    Reply
  • It's a lot like a tablet (for its use cases), except it isn't one (no touch sensors on the screen, no GPS, no rear-facing camera...) I don't see the point, other than the cheaper price -- but you give up so much utility relative to tablets.
    Reply
  • yea i think it may be time to retire my lil ole laptop ''Bettsey" and upgrade... shes an acer i brought off hsn one night when i was buzzzzin....
    Reply
  • assasin32
    I actually expected better battery life out of an ARM based CPU, I imagine they are using a small battery to get the 6.5h battery life and weight under 2.5pounds at that size, still respectable. Price wise though it's on par with netbooks but the big issue is last I checked Chromebooks OS still basically required internet access to be remotely usable.

    If they incorporated more offline functionality than I can see myself picking one up for school, nothing wrong with something cheap to just take notes, write papers, and web browse when you have internet access.
    Reply
  • jhansonxi
    Chromebooks aren't intended to compete with tablets. They are thin clients for schools and government offices where most of the content is on-line multimedia (tests or training videos) and web forms. Nobody in the target market will be playing Crysis on them.
    Reply