IE 10 is Most Energy Efficient Web Browser for Windows 8

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • AMD Radeon
    meh
    Reply
  • PedanticNo1
    That's some serious spin to cover what are no doubt incredible performance deficits.

    ". . . the more efficiently a browser uses power, the longer a user can enjoy the Web on a PC, the lower the electricity costs and the smaller the environmental impact."

    What? My PC operates on batteries? 10,000 homes if 300 million people would just use this one browser. Lol. Pathetic marketing.
    Reply
  • xero141
    18% less energy... 18% more problems, 18% more annoying, 18% less fun...
    Reply
  • Spooderman
    Yes, and the amount of rage after switching to IE 10 would contain the power of a thousand suns.
    Reply
  • smeezekitty
    I call B.S.
    Reply
  • Turns out that not going fast is very efficient, who'd've thunk it?
    Reply
  • QEFX
    I wonder how much energy could be saved from switching from Windows to Linux?
    Reply
  • koga73
    Wow I thought MS couldnt make IE any worse until I saw the windows 8 implementation. As a developer IE has always been a pain in the ass but now with Windows 8 its even worse because now there are two different versions of IE. Desktop and Metro and they behave differently. Developers need to come together and stop supporting IE all together. Throw up a message to the user telling them to get a real browser.
    Reply
  • cmartin011
    So after all the cpu cycles used because of the malware the browser automatically lets surely make up for the efficiency gain. And not only that the energy burned from the screen waiting for the browser to respond
    Reply
  • ddpruitt
    at the request of Microsoft we set the JavaScript timer frequency to “conserve power” in the Windows power options. We found, however, that the default Javascript time frequency for all computers tested was set to“maximum performance.” We did not investigate the impact of this setting upon browser power draw.
    Sorry I saw this line in the actual paper, so this means the entire paper is bunk. On top of that the tests were done manually. Deliberately adjusting your setup to reduce power draw while leaving others at default is total BS.

    Another lame attempt by MS to manipulate PR rather than fix their software.
    Reply