Quake Live Open Beta Ends, Three Plans Emerge

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • shloader
    Worth it to keep it going if you're enough of a Q3A fan. They're not asking some outrageous amount, just genuine community support.
    Reply
  • socrates047
    i think its a good direction (like BF Heroes) to have it free.. we cant always be in front of our rigs can we?
    Reply
  • Thunderfox
    If you're enough of a Q3A fan to be paying for it, you won't be playing it in a web browser window.
    Reply
  • CoryInJapan
    yea...The prices are perfectly fine to keep the game going for the core fans.
    Reply
  • schmich
    Is the idea still to make money off ads? (now on top of subscriptions) I really wouldn't mind having a game with ads if it's to make it free. Wouldn't be hard to get $3.99 per month per player with ads considering the amount we often play. Also comes hand-in-hand in the sense that the people who play the most = the people who use the server's the most = the people who would give a larger revenue.
    Reply
  • dco
    As fun as Q3A was back in the day, new fps have runied any classics with their superior sexy graphics
    Reply
  • nevertell
    ThunderfoxIf you're enough of a Q3A fan to be paying for it, you won't be playing it in a web browser window. I think the hardcore fans will still be paying, even if they won't be playing it in a browser, just to support one of the best game devs out there.
    Reply
  • kd0frg
    bleh.. give me quakeworld or give me death!
    Reply
  • Trialsking
    CoryInJapanyea...The prices are perfectly fine to keep the game going for the core fans.

    Exactly, but if they can get goofballs to pay for such and old game, more power to them!
    Reply
  • killbits
    the browser version (quake live) has much better graphics, effects, etc. than the original cd-rom version from 10 years ago. the dev team has done a great job of updating the engine + optimizing it to run in a browser. the graphics are actually amazing for an engine over a decade old. it's not really even a typical "browser-based" game per se, the browser just gives you access to the quake live client. all that being said it's still the action + gameplay that makes it a great game, not the graphics. either way there is a very large community who still play quake. not sure how many are going to shell out 24 dollars a year to keep it going, though.
    Reply