
Even though it's among the best graphics cards, Intel has announced End of Life status for the Arc A750 Limited Edition graphics card. The Arc A750 won't be leaving the stage by itself: Intel's mobile Arc A series lineup is also following suit.
Intel discontinued the Arc A770 Limited Edition graphics card two years prior. This discontinuation pertains explicitly to Intel's version, whereas custom Arc A770 graphics cards remain unaffected. The same situation applies to the Arc A750. As noted by hardware sleuth momomo_us, Intel's Product Change Notification (PCN) documents 856991 and 856777 outline the discontinuation of the boxed version (21P02J00BAR and 21P02J00BA) of the Arc A750, which is to say, the Arc A750 Limited Edition.
The Arc A750 Limited Edition launched in October 2022, so it hasn't even been on the retail market for three years, yet Intel is discontinuing it. This decision isn't entirely surprising, considering that the Arc A770 Limited Edition debuted alongside the Arc A750 Limited Edition but was discontinued after less than a year.
Retailers may continue to place orders for the Arc A750 Limited Edition (21P02J00BAR and 21P02J00BA) until June 30 and June 27, respectively. Intel anticipates that the final graphics card shipments will be dispatched by September 30 and September 26, respectively. As such, it's just a matter of time before the Arc A750 Limited Edition is no longer available on retailers' shelves.
Marketing Name | Product Code | Last Product Discontinuance Order Date | Last Product Discontinuance Shipment Date |
---|---|---|---|
Intel Arc A750 Graphics (8GB), box | 21P02J00BAR | June 30, 2025 | September 30, 2025 |
Intel Arc A750 Graphics (8GB), box | 21P02J00BA | June 27, 2025 | September 26, 2025 |
Intel Arc A530M Graphics, FC-BGA16E, Tray | FD8071105014884 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel Arc A350M Graphics, FC-BGA16F, Tray | FD8071104610795 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel Arc 730M Graphics, FC-BGA16E, Tray | FD8071104590342 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel Arc 770M Graphics, FC-BGA16E, Tray | FD8071104590339 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel Arc A770 Graphics (8GB), bulk | FD8071104590345 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel® Arc A570M Graphics, FC-BGA16E, Tray | FD8071105014883 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel® Arc A570M Graphics, FC-BGA16E, Tray | FD8071104610794 | November 18, 2025 | May 20, 2026 |
Intel Arc Pro A30M Graphics, FC-BGA16F, Tray | FD8071104610753 | September 30, 2025 | January 30, 2026 |
Meanwhile, the PCN document 855345 indicates that Intel is currently phasing out the Arc A770 when sold in bulk. More significantly, the entire Arc A-series mobile lineup, encompassing the Arc A370M to the Arc A770M, has been placed on the EOL (end-of-life) list. The final opportunity to order the affected SKUs is November 18, with the last orders anticipated to be shipped by May 20, 2026.
For now, the Arc Pro series seems safe. Intel is only discontinuing one Arc Pro SKU, the Arc Pro A30M for mobile devices. Partners may continue to place orders until September 30, with final shipments scheduled for January 30, 2026.
In the interim, the Arc A380 and Arc A580 have avoided imminent discontinuation. However, Intel is clearly restructuring its product lineup to accommodate next-generation graphics cards.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Intel has launched two Battlemage SKUs so far: the Arc B580 in December 2024 and the Arc B570 in January 2025. While gamers have been asking for something more powerful, Intel has remained silent on the subject. Rumors suggest that the chipmaker may not release a high-end Battlemage graphics card to compete with Nvidia and AMD. Meanwhile, discrete cards built on the third-gen Celestial architecture may be on the far horizon.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
abufrejoval If anyone needs a reminder on the depth of commitment Intel has in the dGPU space, this should serve well.Reply
IMHO all of Intels dGPU activities are nothing but crude attempts at shareholder appeasement, nothing to do with actual users or clients of Intel tech.
Looking at the product range and how it's evolving they clearly aren't interested in acutally capturing market share, as they seem to loose money (or fall way below prescribed margins) on every GPU sold. It's all show and the only reasonable audience for that show must be actual or potential shareholders/investors.
Intel currently needs to put in quite a few more transistors, bandwidth or just hardware resources to draw close to Nvidia or AMD offerings and that isn't sustainable. So expanding the product range to professional variants of the B580 or going for a B7x0 can only mean enlarging the financial wounds for every unit sold. Small wonder they all seem paper launches, because Intel does understand the bottom line, even if they don't know how to meet it any more.
Please try to believe me that I want to be wrong in the interest of more competition and better customer value. I just don't see the data points to sustain that dream. -
rluker5
Intel just needs to compress their design. The 9060XT 16GB has 50% more transistors than the B580 and is 28% faster at a 40% higher MSRP. In a lot of games the 8GB is behind the B580. HWU just had a video where the 8GB was a lot further behind the 16GB 9060XT than 28% if you didn't have PCIe gen 5. If Intel adjusted their design to increase transistor density they would be even with AMD already in their offered performance segments.abufrejoval said:If anyone needs a reminder on the depth of commitment Intel has in the dGPU space, this should serve well.
IMHO all of Intels dGPU activities are nothing but crude attempts at shareholder appeasement, nothing to do with actual users or clients of Intel tech.
Looking at the product range and how it's evolving they clearly aren't interested in acutally capturing market share, as they seem to loose money (or fall way below prescribed margins) on every GPU sold. It's all show and the only reasonable audience for that show must be actual or potential shareholders/investors.
Intel currently needs to put in quite a few more transistors, bandwidth or just hardware resources to draw close to Nvidia or AMD offerings and that isn't sustainable. So expanding the product range to professional variants of the B580 or going for a B7x0 can only mean enlarging the financial wounds for every unit sold. Small wonder they all seem paper launches, because Intel does understand the bottom line, even if they don't know how to meet it any more.
Please try to believe me that I want to be wrong in the interest of more competition and better customer value. I just don't see the data points to sustain that dream.
Will that take 2 more gens? Hard to say, but definitely seems possible. -
dalauder
That comes back to commitment to consumers. There's a reason I don't build with Intel CPUs and haven't recommended one since 2015. They change their sockets so often and nickel and dime you for artificially locked features. They even toyed around with letting you buy back features after the CPU was installed.rluker5 said:Intel just needs to compress their design. The 9060XT 16GB has 50% more transistors than the B580 and is 28% faster at a 40% higher MSRP. In a lot of games the 8GB is behind the B580. HWU just had a video where the 8GB was a lot further behind the 16GB 9060XT than 28% if you didn't have PCIe gen 5. If Intel adjusted their design to increase transistor density they would be even with AMD already in their offered performance segments.
Will that take 2 more gens? Hard to say, but definitely seems possible.
I did like their GPUs and wanted to get one if I could ever catch a sale.