Arc A770M Beats GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, According to Intel

Intel Arc
Intel Arc (Image credit: Intel)

Intel announced the company's Arc Alchemist mobile lineup back in March. The high-end Arc 7 A730M and A770M won't hit the U.S. market until summer, but they're already shipping in select laptops in China. In a new reviewer's guide, Intel claims that the A730M and A770M are faster than Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile and RTX 3060 Mobile, respectively.

The A730M and the A770M are the top performers from the A-series mobile lineup. The discrete graphics cards feature Intel's ACM-G10 silicon baked with TSMC's 6nm process node. The A730M comes with 24 Xe cores, 24 ray tracing units, and a clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. The superior A770M has eight more Xe cores and ray tracing units while also enjoying a clock speed that hits 1,650 MHz. As a result, the A770M offers twice the compute performance as the A730M. There's also a significant gap in memory configuration between the A730M and A770M. The A730M has 12GB of GDDR6 memory across a 192-bit memory interface, whereas the A770M wields 16GB of GDDR6 and a 256-bit memory bus.

As always, we recommend you approach vendor benchmarks with caution. The disparity between the hardware for the four gaming laptops that Intel used in its tests is evident. The A730M pre-production unit features the latest Core i7-12700H, a 14-core Alder Lake-H chip, and 16GB of DDR5-4800. On the other hand, the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile belongs to the ROG Zephyrus M16, which has the previous octa-core Core i7-11800H Tiger Lake chip and 16GB of DDR4-3200 memory. More importantly, Asus' device uses the 60W version of the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti. For reference, there are 70W and 80W variants, so the one inside the ROG Zephyrus M16 isn't the best-performing SKU.

There's even a more notorious difference between the A770M and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile machines. The A770M's pre-production laptop has a 14-core Core i9-12900HK, the flagship Alder Lake-H SKU, and 16GB of DDR5-4800 memory. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile emerges inside the MSI Pulse GL66, which has nearly the exact same specifications as the ROG Zephyrus M16. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile has a TGP range between 60W and 115W, and the MSI Pulse GL66 features the 85W variant.

Caveats on the discrepancies in test hardware notwithstanding, let's go ahead and hit the Intel-provided benchmarks.

Arc A730M, A770M Benchmarks

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • KananX
    According to Intel they will also have a competitor to the 3080 and 3070, early 2022! 😂 I don’t even think it will happen this year.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    KananX said:
    According to Intel they will also have a competitor to the 3080 and 3070, early 2022! 😂 I don’t even think it will happen this year.
    Last time I checked, they stated performance between the 3060ti and 3070, which seems about in line with the new claims right now?
    Reply
  • dalek1234
    "according to Intel" typically translates into "Not happening". Trusting what Intel says is like trusting what Poo-tin says.
    Reply
  • KananX
    KyaraM said:
    Last time I checked, they stated performance between the 3060ti and 3070, which seems about in line with the new claims right now?
    There were so many rumors and expectations were steadily adjusted so I don’t know anymore.😂 have to say, at this point it’s better they give up and free up the precious wafers for AMD/NV.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    KananX said:
    There were so many rumors and expectations were steadily adjusted so I don’t know anymore.😂 have to say, at this point it’s better they give up and free up the precious wafers for AMD/NV.
    I don't want to have that. I want as many options to chose from as possible. Competition is healthy after all and I want another option than Invidia since I got burned by AMD cards to the point I'm not inclined to touch them again in the forseeable future.
    Reply
  • KananX
    KyaraM said:
    I don't want to have that. I want as many options to chose from as possible. Competition is healthy after all and I want another option than Invidia since I got burned by AMD cards to the point I'm not inclined to touch them again in the forseeable future.
    Oof that’s sad, AMD improved a lot, I think you should give them another chance instead of hoping for Intel to be good. I read a lot of consumer reviews on shopping sites, many people are happy with AMD and the drivers too.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    KananX said:
    you should give them another chance
    No.
    Reply
  • gg83
    KyaraM said:
    No.
    Intel will be a full generation behind AMD/Nvidia when they finally hit the western markets.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    gg83 said:
    Intel will be a full generation behind AMD/Nvidia when they finally hit the western markets.
    No they won't, intel won't be competing against the new gen high end but against the older gens mid-high cards.
    They don't need to have a single win against the newest and biggest nvidia/amd cards, most of the market wants cheap GPUs and nvidia/amd alone can't provide enough of them.
    Intel's compute and AI cards will have to compete, if intel wants to make money, but those don't have to run games and at benchmarks arc is pretty good.
    Reply
  • KananX
    TerryLaze said:
    No they won't, intel won't be competing against the new gen high end but against the older gens mid-high cards.
    They don't need to have a single win against the newest and biggest nvidia/amd cards, most of the market wants cheap GPUs and nvidia/amd alone can't provide enough of them.
    Intel's compute and AI cards will have to compete, if intel wants to make money, but those don't have to run games and at benchmarks arc is pretty good.
    He is completely correct with what he said. Intel aspires to be competitive with Nvidia and AMD so what you say doesn’t make much sense. Competitive with the mid range only? So far didnt happen, and again you’re making no sense as new midrange is around the corner and Intel will not be competitive with the new midrange that will arrive this year or early next year.

    For a company like Intel it’s not their goal to be competitive with mid range only and that was formulated by members of Intel frequently, they had performance targets like 3070-3080 not 3060-3060 Ti level.
    Reply