Cyberpunk 2077 Memory Tested: How Much RAM Do You Need?

Cyberpunk 2077 screen shots and image quality comparisons
(Image credit: CD Projekt Red)

We've been pounding on Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarks with our GPU testing and CPU thread fixes. But what about memory? Does your PC's memory configuration matter? Of course, the answer is yes, but we wanted to see just how much it matters.

We've run a handful of benchmarks on an Intel Core i9-10900K system, not because it's necessarily the fastest CPU for playing Cyberpunk 2077, but because Intel's Z490 platform tends to have better compatibility with memory kits. The results here should apply to X570 Zen 3 and Zen 2 CPUs and other platforms as well, but we haven't taken the time to confirm that yet. Consider these preliminary findings as yet another data point if you're trying to build the ultimate Cyberpunk 2077 PC.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • VforV
    Are you guys aware that CP 77 does not properly use CPUs, RAM and Vram on PC?

    There is a mod that fixes both CPU SMT and memory allocation issues, as well as other issues.

    Take a look > https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/107?tab=description
    While it's nice to have this test of yours, it's pretty much usless at this point if the game has so many issues and is not working properly with the hardware it's given, not even on PC.
    Reply
  • hotaru.hino
    VforV said:
    Are you guys aware that CP 77 does not properly use CPUs, RAM and Vram on PC?

    There is a mod that fixes both CPU SMT and memory allocation issues, as well as other issues.

    Take a look > https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/107?tab=description
    While it's nice to have this test of yours, it's pretty much usless at this point if the game has so many issues and is not working properly with the hardware it's given, not even on PC.
    I think it's worth still keeping the testing with a more or less out of the box configuration. It's what most people are going to be running with anyway.

    Otherwise this could snowball into something like we may as well invalidate every test that doesn't include highly tuned "performance" tweaks because the software isn't "running properly"
    Reply
  • salgado18
    It needs to be measured on a drive by through the city, where asset loading is more requested. The results here are still interesting, but there is another aspect of this game, which is real-time loading of stuff.

    Also, are you guys planning on testing HDD vs SATA SSD vs mid-range NVME vs PCIe 4.0 NVME? If so, test it driving! That's the most demanding scenario. And if you have the time, merge this with RAM testing, can one compensate the other?

    Oh, and I wish you all infinite budget and time to do all the testing ;)
    Reply
  • San Pedro
    VforV said:
    Are you guys aware that CP 77 does not properly use CPUs, RAM and Vram on PC?

    There is a mod that fixes both CPU SMT and memory allocation issues, as well as other issues.

    Take a look > https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/107?tab=description
    While it's nice to have this test of yours, it's pretty much usless at this point if the game has so many issues and is not working properly with the hardware it's given, not even on PC.

    They literally have an article that went up yesterday about it. It was on the front page.
    Reply
  • Im_A_Decoy
    Jesus Christ Jarred, you aren't really testing performance scaling with memory capacity here. All of the 32 GB configurations here are dual rank (4x8 GB and 2x16 GB). The rank interleaving on these is providing a massive boost in performance that is completely unrelated to capacity. The ONLY test on capacity here is the 2x8 GB kit vs the 2x4 GB kit at the same timings because they are both single rank and even that produced a miniscule performance difference. Then you go and say "Capacity clearly starts to matter more with ray tracing, and the 32GB DDR4-4000 kit is about 9 percent faster than the same kit with only 16GB (two DIMMs)." That's ridiculous. The performance CLEARLY comes from the rank interleaving. want more proof? Grab a 2x16 GB kit that's single rank and test with that. They exist, and I'm pretty sure they're quite common in Crucial products right now. You've effectively mislead anyone who ends up buying a single rank 32 GB kit with this false explanation of capacity being the cause of the performance increase. Terrible article at best. I'd suggest it gets pulled or heavily modified.
    Reply
  • Pytheus
    Incredibly predictable results.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Im_A_Decoy said:
    Jesus Christ Jarred, you aren't really testing performance scaling with memory capacity here. All of the 32 GB configurations here are dual rank (4x8 GB and 2x16 GB). The rank interleaving on these is providing a massive boost in performance that is completely unrelated to capacity. The ONLY test on capacity here is the 2x8 GB kit vs the 2x4 GB kit at the same timings because they are both single rank and even that produced a miniscule performance difference. Then you go and say "Capacity clearly starts to matter more with ray tracing, and the 32GB DDR4-4000 kit is about 9 percent faster than the same kit with only 16GB (two DIMMs)." That's ridiculous. The performance CLEARLY comes from the rank interleaving. want more proof? Grab a 2x16 GB kit that's single rank and test with that. They exist, and I'm pretty sure they're quite common in Crucial products right now. You've effectively mislead anyone who ends up buying a single rank 32 GB kit with this false explanation of capacity being the cause of the performance increase. Terrible article at best. I'd suggest it gets pulled or heavily modified.
    Dual rank does not make that much of a difference, sorry. It's a few percent typically. And considering you generally don't get single rank 16GB DIMMs, unless you explicitly seek them out (and why would you?), you're the one jumping to conclusions. I said the memory was single rank (technically I said bank, but I've edited it now -- blame the lack of sleep) on the lower configs and dual rank on the 32GB. Not much more you can do about that.
    Reply
  • Im_A_Decoy
    Common misconception and other sources disagree. It depends on the game! But one thing for certain is that it will be a much larger difference than changing capacity.

    https://www.techspot.com/article/1971-more-ram-modules-better-for-gaming/https://www.techspot.com/article/2140-ryzen-5000-memory-performance/-UkGu6A-6sQView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UkGu6A-6sQ
    25NW8cHNrgAView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25NW8cHNrgA

    I love how you completely disregard the miniscule difference between your 8 GB vs 16 GB setup, but chalk up a 9% difference to a change from 16 GB to 32 GB with other factors in play.

    Edit: Getting a 404 on the article now, so maybe the message came through shrug
    Reply
  • tennis2
    How much? This article should be titled WHAT SPEED
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    tennis2 said:
    How much? This article should be titled WHAT SPEED
    Actually, it covers both aspects, but fitting both into the headline would have made it too long.
    Reply