DeepMind Will Research How To Keep AI Under Control, For Society's Benefit

DeepMind announced the creation of a new “Ethics & Society” division inside the company, which will focus on ensuring that AI benefits society and doesn’t get out of control.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • ledhead11
    Praise thee to St. Asimov and thy laws!

    Meanwhile. . .I think I know which AI might be the first to be attacked by another AI.
    Reply
  • ledhead11
    I have to add that this is another situation of be careful of what you wish for. Much like those demons or djinn of lore, what we define is very much dependent of our perspective and the perspective of the one grating can be much different.
    Reply
  • thx1138v2
    One simple question: which should have more rights, the individual or the collective?

    Marxism, in all it's forms, sounds good at first glance. A basic tenet is, from each according to their abilities and to each according to their needs. What could be more fair than that? It breaks down, however, when you ask who decides? Who decides what abilities have value and are therefore allowed to be developed. Who decides what a person's needs are?

    Will it be an algorithm or the person themselves?

    THX1138 or 1984?
    Reply
  • middlemarkal
    Sorry leadhead11, I just wanted to add to your comment, never done that before :-(

    But of course there is no equivalent to those 3 laws in there ????
    Reply
  • jossrik
    It's never too early to talk to your kids about A.I.
    Reply
  • ledhead11
    20240321 said:
    Sorry leadhead11, I just wanted to add to your comment, never done that before :-(

    But of course there is no equivalent to those 3 laws in there ????

    It's all good. Been to long since I read it but definitely felt the intent of them was present.
    Reply
  • grimfox
    It's never to early to talk to your AI about your kids. Specifically, not enslaving them as living batteries. It would be interesting to see if MS's Twitterbot would, under the same and different circumstances, develop similar "personality traits." as the first go around. Could you develop an algorithm to mimic the 3 laws in a twitter bot. One that would reject hate and toxicity as a form of "a robot shall not harm a human"
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I find it interesting that this is merely a group within one specific corporate player, in this space. While it should be applauded, the business isn't even beholden to adhere to this group's findings, not to speak of their competitors. DeepMind doesn't have a monopoly, and won't even hold the lead on this tech, forever.

    Regardless of who studies the subject matter, governments eventually need to codify the findings into laws, and ultimately treaties should be drafted (akin to those concerning nuclear weapons, for instance) to establish baseline rules for all countries wishing to trade in tech & AI-based products & services. It's only in this way that we can hope to avoid an AI arms race, or a corporate race to the ethical bottom of where AI could take us.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    20240284 said:
    One simple question: which should have more rights, the individual or the collective?

    Marxism,
    ...
    LOL, wut?
    Reply
  • Icehearted
    Since you mention Twitter-based AI, and later you say, "DeepMind team has started researching ethics for AI, so that the AI they build can be shaped by society’s concerns and priorities.", then I wonder; who is to say what a society's ethics really are? A popular enough hashtag on twitter was killallmen, for example. What would AI make of such a societal viewpoint? If history has shown us anything, it might be more extremist development.

    The genie is out of the bottle on this one, and I think, like technology-dependency we see now, AI will be a deeply integrated part of common life in the very near future, perhaps with very dire consequences. Maybe not like Terminator bad, but possibly as bad or worse.
    Reply