Take That, Touchpad: No Open WebOS Support For You
If it's not dead the first time around, perhaps another stab it in the back will get the job done?
Open webOS is marching toward its first release, but it won't have many products to run on, because previous webOS devices will not be supported. The reason for that circumstance is the fact that the new operating system is based on the Linux 3.3 kernel and requires SoC support. In HP's words:
"For Open webOS we are aiming for support on future hardware platforms where SoC’s support Linux 3.3+ kernel and where open source replacements for proprietary components are integrated. Existing devices cannot be supported because of those many proprietary components, including graphics, networking and lack of drivers for a modern kernel (but of course, there is the Community Edition for those interested in improving the TouchPad)."
You can easily argue in favor of dropping Touchpad support as it's necessary to leave baggage behind and begin with a clean slate. Supporting the Touchpad, however, would not have been baggage; it would have been support in the hundreds of thousands of devices that could have helped Open webOS gain traction and visibility. Perhaps an initial release for the Touchpad and then a move to something else would have been the smarter decision.
A clean slate would have been what HP should have done with webOS when it acquired Palm and when it had the power to push a new platform in the market using its massive weight. At this point, however, you wonder why HP even bothers keep webOS on life support while it continues to cut off body parts.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
-
aftcomet I absolutely loved WebOS's approach to multi-tasking. The system had a lot of potential. HP really mishandled it.Reply -
amuffin Bought the Touchpad months ago, it was really usefull for browsing the forums. But now, it just sits there. :(Reply -
itsderekdude If you have no need for the front facing camera, just load cyanogen on it. It's works insanely well.Reply -
tomaz99 WebOS was nice...but when cyanogenmod released ICS I never looked back.Reply
I assumed that the original OS would no longer be supported when they dumped their expensive hardware for next to nothing with a big 'going out of business' sign... -
Thunderfox I regularly use my touchpad for web browsing. That's what I bought it for, and it works fine for that.Reply
As a platform, WebOS beats the hell out of Android for its support of useful multitasking. I don't care a whole lot about apps, so that particular platform deficit doesn't affect me much.
I hope WebOS survives and improves, even if the touchpad does not benefit from it. I think most people would like it if they had a chance to try it. -
belardo ThunderfoxI regularly use my touchpad for web browsing. That's what I bought it for, and it works fine for that. As a platform, WebOS beats the hell out of Android for its support of useful multitasking. I don't care a whole lot about apps, so that particular platform deficit doesn't affect me much. LOL!!Reply
If you only got it for browsing, then why do you care about multi-tasking? ICS (Android 4.0) and newer has a new and vastly improved task-switcher, very much like WebOS. I'll admit, I use my iPad mostly for browsing.
A lot of apps? there are no apps to multi-task either :)
For a $100 tablet, the HP is a fine deal. Meanwhile the Nexus 7 sells for $200 new, is supported and is a better device in every way.
I did try out the TouchPad, it was next to an iPad2 at a WalMart. It was a $500 joke with good ideas, but done badly (see Commodore / CBM). The screen and shape was iPad1. The cheap plastic back was cheap plastic.. made my hands feel yucky. The OS (back then) was not stable, could not rotate the screen correctly. The camera of course, is useless. Hence, it bombed badly - worse than RIM's Playbook which is drowning in its own waste. For $100, it was a fair price and became the #2 tablet in the world! :)
HP did a half-ass job on the TouchPad and the phones, canceled both quickly as well as WebOS printers and computers (Bwahahaha) If it sold for $300~350 retail, it might have had a chance. *might*
The technical market seems to handle only 2-3 standards. (PC/Mac/Distant Linux) (iOS / Android / ?) (PlayStation / Xbox / Nintendo).
WebOS is a zombie OS, like OS/2, AmigaOS, MeeGo, etc... -
belardo PS: Not to attack WebOS usres / TouchPad. Just its reality that these are a dead platform. You got it cheap and no need to expect more. Yes, WebOS was promising. Its not shocking that HP totally screwed it up.Reply -
razor512 I got my HP touchpad for $100 during the fire sale and have not used my android tablet since.Reply
In terms of the UI and the keyboard, webos easily crushed any other mobile OS, the only limitation is the number of apps.
it offers far better multitasking than android or iOS, extremely easy to mod.
For the most part, I am hooked on webOS mainly for the multitasking (gestures instead of a screen space wasting home bar thing)
and the keyboard. I don;t think anyone could possible find the android keyboard or iOS keyboard better than this. it actually has a number row that you don't have to go through a menu and
Here is a screenshot from my HP touchpad that I am using right now while in bed
http://i.imgur.com/Tln80.png
The tablet also performs extremely well, especially when overclocked to 1.89GHz, and also when the GPU is overclocked from 266MHz, to 320MHz (faster than tegra 2 at stock speeds) (with room for an even higher GPU overclock)
it currently has a relatively stable CM9 build with CM10 jelly bean in a very early alpha stage
It just runs great, and can handle 1080p videos smoothly.
With this tablet, HP got a lot right, where they failed was charging ipad prices at a time when their OS hardly had any apps. when it first came out, it was priced to compete with the ipad but it had only a hand full of applications (all the rest in their claims were from older webos devices that it was able to run in a emulation mode that was poorly made since it only uses about 1/4th of the screen to display the app in a tiny window and fill the rest of the screen with a gray gradient. (at least android allows you to expand the app to fill the screen and if it is made right, text and other things will scale well.)
anyway, the device only had a bad start, other than that, it is still one of the best tablets on the market.