Intel Reveals 10nm+ Ice Lake Processors With Precious Few Details

Intel listed the Ice Lake family in its processors and chipsets section on its website, but the listing is short on meaningful details.

Here's everything Intel said about the new processors:

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • robax91
    So we're finally here. 10nm. With the trickle effect being permanent, it wouldn't surprise me if they weren't already working on 8nm tbh.
    Reply
  • Lazovski
    So where has Cannonlake gone to ?..
    "And (W)inte(r)l gave Spring and Summer a miss and went straight on into Autumn."
    Reply
  • Matt_550
    After this they'll go to 7mm not 8mm......
    Reply
  • Matt_550
    Meant 7nm...
    Reply
  • Malik 722
    but ice lake i think won't happen till the end of 2018 but any way seeing the technology move like this really make me happy.
    Reply
  • none12345
    "So we're finally here."

    Not really... Coffee lake isnt out yet, let alone cannon lake, let alone ice lake. Tho cannon lake for mobile is suppose to be the first 10nm not ice lake.

    Its more like they are finally getting close....but still haven't arrived at 10nm. 10nm is what 1.5 years late now, should be 2ish years late by the time it debouches for mobile chips(longer for desktop chips)

    And yes, they are certainly working on 7nm already. And they are also likely working on 5nm as well. These things take a LONG time to develop, the industry starts working on the next 2 processes before the current one is finished.
    Reply
  • bloodroses
    7nm sounds like it will be it for a while until fundamental changes occur in chip design:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_nanometer

    Looks like Intel will only have one more die shrink to go after ice lake; then it'll be a waiting game.
    Reply
  • HEXiT
    if that die pic is accurate, it looks to be a quad with gpu (630ish) and more pci-e lanes.(im guessing possibly 24?)
    Reply
  • JamesSneed
    I knew Intel was sitting on 10nm and IceLake waiting for competition, miking the current 14nm designs. The likely made many billions more so I don't blame them. We can thank AMD for the timing of this otherwise they would still be tweaking there 14nm parts next year.
    Reply
  • zippyzion
    @Jamessneed

    Really? Because all the articles that I've read have cited difficulty with the 10nm fab process. Did you know that Kaby Lake was supposed to be 10nm?

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/07/intel-confirms-tick-tock-shattering-kaby-lake-processor-as-moores-law-falters/

    They had similar difficulty going from 22nm to 14nm as well. It seems that shrinking and packing transistors is a pretty hard thing to do. So much so that even Intel with its massive R&D team has had problems... errr sorry, difficulties. Intel never said problems, only difficulties.
    Reply